• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聚焦离子束/扫描电子显微镜对瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的分析:区分增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩

Analysis of Scars and Keloids by Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy: Distinguishing Between Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids.

作者信息

Migita Hisashi, Rikimaru Hideaki, Rikimaru-Nishi Yukiko, Koga Noriyuki, Watanabe Koichi, Ohta Keisuke, Nakamura Kei-Ichiro, Kiyokawa Kensuke

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Division of Microscopic and Developmental Anatomy, Department of Anatomy.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;84(4):379-384. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002231.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000002231
PMID:32118630
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Histological differentiation between hypertrophic scars (HSs) and keloids has been considered difficult. In this study, we analyzed differences in the 3-dimensional tissue architecture between HSs and keloids using focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM).

METHODS

Five specimens each of normal skin, normotrophic scars (NSs), HSs, and keloids were investigated. Three sites in each specimen were observed by FIB/SEM tomography, resulting in an observation of 15 sites per tissue type. We identified fibroblasts and macrophages and assessed the contact ratio and the mode of intercellular contact (planar contact or point contact). The significance of differences among the 4 tissue types was determined by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

In normal skin, contact between fibroblasts and macrophages was observed at all 15 sites, and the mode of contact was always planar. There was contact at 87% of the NS sites (planar: point = 80%: 7%). In HSs, contact was seen at 80% of the sites (planar: point = 20%: 60%). In keloids, contact was found at only 15% of the sites (planar: point = 7.5%: 7.5%). The intercellular contact ratio showed no significant differences among normal skin, NSs, and HSs; however, a significant difference was noted between these tissues and keloids. The intercellular contact mode also showed no significant difference between normal skin and NSs, but a significant difference between these tissues and HSs.

CONCLUSIONS

These histopathologic findings suggest that FIB/SEM tomography is useful for distinguishing between HSs and keloids and can provide important knowledge for understanding the pathogenesis of keloids.

摘要

背景

肥厚性瘢痕(HSs)和瘢痕疙瘩之间的组织学鉴别一直被认为具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们使用聚焦离子束/扫描电子显微镜(FIB/SEM)分析了HSs和瘢痕疙瘩之间三维组织结构的差异。

方法

对正常皮肤、正常瘢痕(NSs)、HSs和瘢痕疙瘩各5个标本进行研究。通过FIB/SEM断层扫描观察每个标本中的3个部位,每种组织类型共观察15个部位。我们识别成纤维细胞和巨噬细胞,并评估接触比例和细胞间接触模式(平面接触或点接触)。通过Fisher精确检验确定4种组织类型之间差异的显著性。

结果

在正常皮肤的所有15个部位均观察到成纤维细胞与巨噬细胞之间的接触,且接触模式均为平面接触。在NSs的87%的部位观察到接触(平面接触:点接触 = 80%:7%)。在HSs中,80%的部位观察到接触(平面接触:点接触 = 20%:60%)。在瘢痕疙瘩中,仅15%的部位观察到接触(平面接触:点接触 = 7.5%:7.5%)。细胞间接触比例在正常皮肤、NSs和HSs之间无显著差异;然而,这些组织与瘢痕疙瘩之间存在显著差异。细胞间接触模式在正常皮肤和NSs之间也无显著差异,但这些组织与HSs之间存在显著差异。

结论

这些组织病理学发现表明,FIB/SEM断层扫描有助于区分HSs和瘢痕疙瘩,并可为理解瘢痕疙瘩的发病机制提供重要知识。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Scars and Keloids by Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy: Distinguishing Between Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids.聚焦离子束/扫描电子显微镜对瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的分析:区分增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;84(4):379-384. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002231.
2
Hypertrophic and keloid scars fail to progress from the CD34 /α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) immature scar phenotype and show gradient differences in α-SMA and p16 expression.肥厚性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩无法从CD34/α-平滑肌肌动蛋白(α-SMA)不成熟瘢痕表型进展,并且在α-SMA和p16表达上存在梯度差异。
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Apr;182(4):974-986. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18219. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
3
Increased epidermal thickness and abnormal epidermal differentiation in keloid scars.增生性瘢痕表皮增厚和表皮分化异常。
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Jan;176(1):116-126. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14844. Epub 2016 Nov 26.
4
Alterations in fibroblast alpha1beta1 integrin collagen receptor expression in keloids and hypertrophic scars.瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕中成纤维细胞α1β1整合素胶原受体表达的改变
J Invest Dermatol. 2002 Mar;118(3):409-15. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01680.x.
5
Vascularization pattern in hypertrophic scars and keloids: a stereological analysis.增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的血管形成模式:体视学分析
Pathol Res Pract. 2003;199(7):469-73. doi: 10.1078/0344-0338-00447.
6
Studies of transforming growth factors beta 1-3 and their receptors I and II in fibroblast of keloids and hypertrophic scars.瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕成纤维细胞中转化生长因子β1-3及其Ⅰ型和Ⅱ型受体的研究
Acta Derm Venereol. 2005;85(3):216-20. doi: 10.1080/00015550410025453.
7
Endothelial dysfunction may play a key role in keloid and hypertrophic scar pathogenesis - Keloids and hypertrophic scars may be vascular disorders.内皮功能障碍可能在瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕的发病机制中起关键作用——瘢痕疙瘩和增生性瘢痕可能是血管性疾病。
Med Hypotheses. 2016 Nov;96:51-60. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
Comparative ultrastructure of hypertrophic scars and keloids.增生性瘢痕和瘢痕疙瘩的超微结构比较
Scan Electron Microsc. 1984(Pt 1):423-31.
9
Characterization of In Vitro Reconstructed Human Normotrophic, Hypertrophic, and Keloid Scar Models.体外重建的人类正常、增生和瘢痕疙瘩模型的表征。
Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018 Apr;24(4):242-253. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0464. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
10
[The distrubution of cell cycle on fibrolasts derived from the pathlogical scars and analysis of Fas gene mutations in keloids using polymerse chain Reaction-based single-strand conformation polymorphism].[病理性瘢痕来源成纤维细胞的细胞周期分布及应用聚合酶链反应-单链构象多态性技术分析瘢痕疙瘩中Fas基因突变]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2000 Sep;80(9):709-12.

引用本文的文献

1
Congress Report on the Second World Congress of Global Scar Society with Scar Academy and Japan Scar Workshop.关于全球瘢痕协会第二届世界大会暨瘢痕研究院与日本瘢痕研讨会的国会报告。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Apr 14;11(4):e4921. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004921. eCollection 2023 Apr.