• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术的短期和长期结局:一项系统评价方案

The short-term and long-term outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: A protocol for a systematic review.

作者信息

Lei Xiang, Wei Zhili, Liu Shidong, Liang Fuxiang, Song Bing

机构信息

First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19307. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019307.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000019307
PMID:32118752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7478717/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an essential alternate option for people suffering from aortic stenosis. However, the efficacy and safety of TAVR for elderly population (aged over 80 years) is still unclear.

METHODS

We plan to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical controlled trials and propensity-match cohort studies to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly aortic stenosis patients who undergo a transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement. We will search PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library using a comprehensive strategy. The related conference proceedings and reference lists of the included studies will also be checked to identify additional studies. Two reviewers will screen retrieved records, extract information, and assess the risk of bias independently. STATA software will be used to conduct data synthesis. There is no requirement of ethical approval and informed consent.

RESULTS

This study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic assessment of TAVR for elderly patients with aortic stenosis. We hope it will provide a relatively comprehensive reference for clinical practice and future relevant clinical trials.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval and patient consent are not required as this study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019140857.

STUDY PROTOCOL REGISTRY

The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO, which is an International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The registration number is CRD42019140857.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)已成为主动脉瓣狭窄患者的重要替代选择。然而,TAVR 用于老年人群(80 岁以上)的疗效和安全性仍不明确。

方法

我们计划对临床对照试验和倾向匹配队列研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估接受经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术的老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者的短期和长期结局。我们将采用综合策略检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和考克兰图书馆。还将检查纳入研究的相关会议论文集和参考文献列表,以识别其他研究。两名审阅者将独立筛选检索到的记录、提取信息并评估偏倚风险。将使用 STATA 软件进行数据合成。无需伦理批准和知情同意。

结果

本研究将提交给同行评审期刊发表。

结论

这是对老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者 TAVR 的首次系统评估。我们希望它能为临床实践和未来相关临床试验提供较为全面的参考。

伦理与传播

由于本研究是一项系统评价和荟萃分析,因此无需伦理批准和患者同意。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019140857。

研究方案注册

该方案已在 PROSPERO 注册,PROSPERO 是一个国际前瞻性系统评价注册库。注册号为 CRD42019140857。

相似文献

1
The short-term and long-term outcomes of transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: A protocol for a systematic review.老年患者经导管或外科主动脉瓣置换术的短期和长期结局:一项系统评价方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19307. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019307.
2
Comparison of outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with advanced age: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高龄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术结局的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 31;99(31):e21443. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021443.
3
Remote ischaemic preconditioning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的远程缺血预处理:系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 25;14(4):e080200. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080200.
4
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low surgical risk: A meta-analysis of randomized trials and propensity score matched observational studies.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机试验和倾向评分匹配观察性研究的荟萃分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Aug 1;92(2):408-416. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27518. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
Frailty in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a protocol for a systematic review.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的衰弱:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024163.
6
A meta-analysis and meta-regression of long-term outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的长期疗效的荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 15;225:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.既往接受冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
8
Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者的结局比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195742. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742.
9
Impact of chronic kidney disease on the prognosis of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性肾脏病对主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣置换预后的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 23;100(29):e26696. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026696.
10
Long-term outcomes of single stenting compared with double stenting strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.单支架与双支架策略治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23639. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023639.

本文引用的文献

1
Complications After Self-expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管自膨胀式或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的并发症
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):321-330. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
Association between prospective registration and overall reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.前瞻性注册与系统评价的总体报告和方法学质量之间的关联:一项meta 流行病学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;93:45-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
3
3-Year Outcomes in High-Risk Patients Who Underwent Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.接受外科或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的高危患者的 3 年结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 7;67(22):2565-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.506. Epub 2016 Apr 3.
4
Assessing baseline imbalance in randomised trials: implications for the Cochrane risk of bias tool.评估随机试验中的基线不平衡:对 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具的影响。
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Mar;5(1):79-85. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1090. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
6
A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis.用于对网络荟萃分析中治疗效果估计质量进行评级的GRADE工作组方法。
BMJ. 2014 Sep 24;349:g5630. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5630.
7
Advanced age and the clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.高龄与经导管主动脉瓣植入术的临床结局。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2014 Jun;11(2):163-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5411.2014.02.004.
8
Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium.钙化性主动脉瓣狭窄:瓣膜和心肌疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Nov 6;60(19):1854-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.093. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
10
Insights into degenerative aortic valve disease.退行性主动脉瓣疾病的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Sep 25;50(13):1205-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.06.024. Epub 2007 Sep 10.