Iguchi Toshihiro, Hiraki Takao, Matsui Yusuke, Mitsuhashi Toshiharu, Komaki Toshiyuki, Okamoto Soichiro, Fukuma Shogo, Tomita Koji, Uka Mayu, Kanazawa Susumu
Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol. 2020 Jun;38(6):579-586. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-00935-3. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
To assess specimen weight difference of six types of semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles.
We compared 18- and 20-gauge needles, one aspiration-type (STARCUT aspiration-type, TSK Laboratory, Tochigi, Japan) and five non-aspiration-type (MISSION, BARD, AZ; SuperCore™, Argon Medical Devices, TX; Temno Evolution, Care Fusion, IL; FINE CORE, Toray Medical, Tokyo, Japan; Quick-Core, Cook, IN) needles. Four biopsies were performed with each needle with the longest throw length on an excised bovine liver. The biopsies were repeated with new needles, four times with four different livers. STARCUT was used both with and without aspiration.
Sixteen specimens were obtained with each needle. In needles of gauges, STARCUT with aspiration provided the heaviest specimen and significantly heavier specimens were obtained with STARCUT with aspiration (P < 0.05) than five non-aspiration-type needles. The specimen weight differed significantly (P < 0.001) among all 18- and 20-gauge needles. The specimen weights did not differ significantly between aspiration and non-aspiration biopsies with STARCUT (6.32 vs. 5.97 mg with 18-gauge needle, P = 0.342; 1.95 vs. 1.92 mg with 20-gauge needle, P = 0.886).
Although STARCUT with aspiration provided the heaviest specimen, specimen weights were not significantly different between aspiration and non-aspiration biopsies. We assessed the specimen weight difference of six types of semi-automatic cutting biopsy needles. Significantly heavier specimens were obtained with STARCUT with aspiration than the other needles. The specimen weight differed significantly among all 18- and 20-gauge needles but did not differ significantly between aspiration and non-aspiration biopsies with STARCUT.
评估六种半自动切割活检针的标本重量差异。
我们比较了18号和20号针,一种抽吸式(STARCUT抽吸式,TSK实验室,日本枥木)和五种非抽吸式(MISSION,巴德,亚利桑那州;SuperCore™,氩气医疗设备公司,德克萨斯州;Temno Evolution,Care Fusion公司,伊利诺伊州;FINE CORE,东丽医疗,东京,日本;Quick-Core,库克公司,印第安纳州)针。使用每根针在切除的牛肝上进行四次活检,采用最长穿刺长度。使用新针重复活检,对四块不同的肝脏各进行四次。STARCUT针分别在有抽吸和无抽吸的情况下使用。
每根针均获取了16个标本。在不同规格的针中,有抽吸的STARCUT针获取的标本最重,且有抽吸的STARCUT针获取的标本明显比五种非抽吸式针获取的标本重(P < 0.05)。所有18号和20号针之间的标本重量差异显著(P < 0.001)。STARCUT针有抽吸活检和无抽吸活检的标本重量差异不显著(18号针分别为6.32毫克和5.97毫克,P = 0.342;20号针分别为1.95毫克和1.92毫克,P = 0.886)。
尽管有抽吸的STARCUT针获取的标本最重,但有抽吸活检和无抽吸活检的标本重量差异不显著。我们评估了六种半自动切割活检针的标本重量差异。有抽吸的STARCUT针获取的标本明显比其他针获取的标本重。所有18号和20号针之间的标本重量差异显著,但STARCUT针有抽吸活检和无抽吸活检的标本重量差异不显著。