Institute of Data Science and Statistical Analysis, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071003, China.
State Key Laboratory of Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16362-16376. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08181-w. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
Tremendous energy consumption appears as rapid economic development, leading to large amount of CO emissions. Although plentiful studies have been made into the driving factors of CO emissions, the existing literatures that take the spatial differences and temporal changes into consideration are few. Therefore, this study first analyzes the variations of total CO emissions' spatial distribution from 2008 to 2017 and present the changes of driving factors, finding significant spatial autocorrelation in CO emissions at the province level, and that urbanization rate, per capita GDP and per capita CO emissions increased significantly, but energy consumption structure and trade openness decreased. We then compared the effects of different factors affecting CO emissions, using classic linear regression model, panel data model, and the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, and the three models roughly agree on the effects of factors. The GWR model considering spatial heterogeneity provides more detailed results. Population, urbanization rate, per capita carbon emissions, energy consumption structure, and trade openness all have positive effects, while per capita GDP has a two-way impact on CO emissions. The influence of urbanization rate and energy consumption structure in the central and western regions increased even faster than in eastern regions, and the impacts of trade openness in lower and higher opening areas are more significant. The population and per capita CO emission have declining influences, among which the influence of population in coastal areas declined more slowly, while the rate of decline of per capita CO emission was positively correlated with the local total CO emissions. The Lorenz curve and the Gini coefficient reveal the inequality distribution of CO emissions in various regions, with the highest CO emissions growth in the medium-economic-level areas, where the key area of carbon mitigation is. Finally, per capita GDP reveals that China as a whole has the trend of inverted N-shape Kuznets curve, and the underdeveloped regions are in the rising stage between the two inflection points, while developed regions are at the end of the rising stage and about to reach the second inflection point.
能源消耗巨大是经济快速发展的表现,这导致了大量的二氧化碳排放。尽管已经有大量研究探讨了二氧化碳排放的驱动因素,但考虑到空间差异和时间变化的现有文献却很少。因此,本研究首先分析了 2008 年至 2017 年期间总二氧化碳排放量的空间分布变化,并呈现了驱动因素的变化,发现省级二氧化碳排放具有显著的空间自相关性,城市化率、人均 GDP 和人均二氧化碳排放量显著增加,但能源消费结构和贸易开放度下降。然后,我们使用经典线性回归模型、面板数据模型和地理加权回归(GWR)模型比较了不同因素对二氧化碳排放的影响,这三个模型对因素的影响大致一致。考虑空间异质性的 GWR 模型提供了更详细的结果。人口、城市化率、人均二氧化碳排放量、能源消费结构和贸易开放度均具有正效应,而人均 GDP 对二氧化碳排放具有双向影响。中部和西部地区的城市化率和能源消费结构的影响增长更快,较低和较高开放地区的贸易开放度的影响更为显著。人口和人均二氧化碳排放量的影响呈下降趋势,其中沿海地区的人口影响下降速度较慢,而人均二氧化碳排放量的下降速度与当地总二氧化碳排放量呈正相关。洛伦兹曲线和基尼系数揭示了各地区二氧化碳排放的不平等分布,中高经济水平地区的二氧化碳排放量增长最高,这是碳减排的关键区域。最后,人均 GDP 表明中国整体上呈现出倒 N 型库兹涅茨曲线的趋势,欠发达地区处于两个拐点之间的上升阶段,而发达地区处于上升阶段的末期,即将达到第二个拐点。