• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲基组变异预测晚期 ER 阳性乳腺癌对依西美坦的耐药性。

Methylome Variation Predicts Exemestane Resistance in Advanced ER Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

The authors contributed eually to the article.

出版信息

Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033819896331. doi: 10.1177/1533033819896331.

DOI:10.1177/1533033819896331
PMID:32129154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7057408/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

More than 30% of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers are resistant to primary hormone therapy, and about 40% that initially respond to hormone therapy eventually acquire resistance. Although the mechanisms of hormone therapy resistance remain unclear, aberrant DNA methylation has been implicated in oncogenesis and drug resistance.

PURPOSE

We investigated the relationship between methylome variations in circulating tumor DNA and exemestane resistance, to track hormone therapy efficacy.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 16 patients who were receiving first-line therapy in our center. All patients received exemestane-based hormone therapy after enrollment. We collected blood samples at baseline, first follow-up (after 2 therapeutic cycles) and at detection of disease progression. Disease that progressed within 6 months under exemestane treatment was considered exemestane resistance but was considered relatively exemestane-sensitive otherwise. We obtained circulating tumor DNA-derived methylomes using the whole-genome bisulfide sequencing method. Methylation calling was done by BISMARK software; differentially methylated regions for exemestane resistance were calculated afterward.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for the 16 patients was 19.0 months. We found 7 exemestane resistance-related differentially methylated regions, located in different chromosomes, with both significantly different methylation density and methylation ratio. Baseline methylation density and methylation ratio of chromosome 6 [32400000-32599999] were both high in exemestane resistance. High baseline methylation ratios of chromosome 3 [67800000-67999999] ( = .013), chromosome 3 [140200000-140399999] ( = .037), and chromosome 12 [101200000-101399999] ( = .026) could also predict exemestane resistance. During exemestane treatment, synchronized changes in methylation density and methylation ratio in chromosome 6 [32400000-32599999] could accurately stratify patients in terms of progression-free survival ( = .000033). Cutoff values of methylation density and methylation ratio for chromosome 6 [149600000-149799999] were 0.066 and 0.076, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Methylation change in chromosome 6 [149600000-149799999] is an ideal predictor of exemestane resistance with great clinical potential.

摘要

背景

超过 30%的雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌对初始激素治疗具有抗药性,而大约 40%最初对激素治疗有反应的患者最终会产生抗药性。尽管激素治疗耐药的机制尚不清楚,但异常的 DNA 甲基化与肿瘤发生和耐药有关。

目的

我们研究了循环肿瘤 DNA 甲基组变化与依西美坦耐药之间的关系,以跟踪激素治疗的疗效。

方法

我们前瞻性招募了 16 名正在我们中心接受一线治疗的患者。所有患者入组后均接受依西美坦为基础的激素治疗。我们在基线、第一次随访(治疗 2 个周期后)和疾病进展时采集血样。依西美坦治疗 6 个月内进展的疾病被认为是依西美坦耐药,但否则被认为是相对的依西美坦敏感。我们使用全基因组 bisulfite 测序方法获得循环肿瘤 DNA 衍生的甲基组。通过 BISMARK 软件进行甲基化调用;随后计算依西美坦耐药相关的差异甲基化区域。

结果

16 例患者的中位随访时间为 19.0 个月。我们发现了 7 个与依西美坦耐药相关的差异甲基化区域,位于不同的染色体上,其甲基化密度和甲基化比值均有显著差异。染色体 6 [32400000-32599999]的基线甲基化密度和甲基化比值在依西美坦耐药中均较高。染色体 3 [67800000-67999999]( =.013)和染色体 12 [101200000-101399999]( =.026)的高基线甲基化比值( =.037)也可以预测依西美坦耐药。在依西美坦治疗期间,染色体 6 [32400000-32599999]中的甲基化密度和甲基化比值的同步变化可以准确地对无进展生存期进行分层( =.000033)。染色体 6 [149600000-149799999]的甲基化密度和甲基化比值的截断值分别为 0.066 和 0.076。

结论

染色体 6 [149600000-149799999]中的甲基化变化是依西美坦耐药的理想预测指标,具有很大的临床潜力。

相似文献

1
Methylome Variation Predicts Exemestane Resistance in Advanced ER Breast Cancer.甲基组变异预测晚期 ER 阳性乳腺癌对依西美坦的耐药性。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1533033819896331. doi: 10.1177/1533033819896331.
2
Mutations and Overall Survival on Fulvestrant versus Exemestane in Advanced Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Combined Analysis of the Phase III SoFEA and EFECT Trials.在晚期激素受体阳性乳腺癌中,氟维司群与依西美坦的突变和总体生存:SOFEA 和 EFECT 三期临床试验的联合分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 1;26(19):5172-5177. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0224. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Tracking evolution of aromatase inhibitor resistance with circulating tumour DNA analysis in metastatic breast cancer.循环肿瘤 DNA 分析检测转移性乳腺癌芳香化酶抑制剂耐药的演变。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):145-153. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx483.
4
Serial immunological parameters in a phase II trial of exemestane and low-dose oral cyclophosphamide in advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.在晚期激素受体阳性乳腺癌中应用依西美坦和低剂量口服环磷酰胺的 II 期临床试验中的连续免疫参数。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4570-4. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
5
The potential clinical benefit of targeting androgen receptor (AR) in estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer cells treated with Exemestane.在接受依西美坦治疗的雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌细胞中靶向雄激素受体 (AR) 的潜在临床获益。
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020 May 1;1866(5):165661. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2019.165661. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
6
Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer Resistant to Adjuvant Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.氟维司群 500 mg 对比依西美坦治疗绝经后辅助性非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂耐药的转移性乳腺癌:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Jun;19(3):e452-e458. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2019.01.015. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
7
Risk of early progression according to circulating ESR1 mutation, CA-15.3 and cfDNA increases under first-line anti-aromatase treatment in metastatic breast cancer.一线抗芳香化酶治疗转移性乳腺癌时,根据循环 ESR1 突变、CA-15.3 和 cfDNA 早期进展的风险增加。
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 May 28;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01290-x.
8
A New Genetic Risk Score to Predict the Outcome of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Exemestane: Results From a Prospective Study.一种新的遗传风险评分,用于预测一线依西美坦治疗的局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌患者的结局:来自一项前瞻性研究的结果。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 Apr;19(2):137-145.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
9
Efficacy of exemestane after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor use in metastatic breast cancer patients.非甾体类芳香化酶抑制剂治疗后依西美坦用于转移性乳腺癌患者的疗效
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(3):979-83. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.3.979.
10
Exemestane versus anastrozole as front-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: final results from the Spanish Breast Cancer Group 2001-03 phase 2 randomized trial.依西美坦对比阿那曲唑作为绝经后激素受体阳性、晚期乳腺癌患者的一线内分泌治疗:来自西班牙乳腺癌研究组 2001-03 年 2 期随机试验的最终结果。
Cancer. 2012 Jan 1;118(1):241-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26299. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Liquid Biopsy-Based DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer.基于液体活检的DNA甲基化生物标志物在乳腺癌精准医学中的应用
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2025 Jun 17;27:e20. doi: 10.1017/erm.2025.10008.
2
High expression of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand GDNF identifies a high-risk subset of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.高表达的 RET 受体酪氨酸激酶及其配体 GDNF 可识别出高风险雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌亚群。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(3):589-601. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06937-9. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
3
Whole-Genome Methylation Study of Congenital Lung Malformations in Children.

本文引用的文献

1
Hormone-dependent breast cancer: Targeting autophagy and PI3K overcomes Exemestane-acquired resistance.激素依赖性乳腺癌:靶向自噬和 PI3K 克服依西美坦获得性耐药。
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018 Oct;183:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 20.
2
Epigenetic Mechanisms of Tamoxifen Resistance in Luminal Breast Cancer.腔面型乳腺癌中他莫昔芬耐药的表观遗传机制
Diseases. 2017 Jul 6;5(3):16. doi: 10.3390/diseases5030016.
3
Expression of the MHC class II in triple-negative breast cancer is associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and interferon signaling.
儿童先天性肺畸形的全基因组甲基化研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 28;11:689833. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.689833. eCollection 2021.
4
A Systematic Review of the Use of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Dynamics to Monitor Response to Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.循环游离DNA动态监测转移性乳腺癌患者治疗反应的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Apr 10;13(8):1811. doi: 10.3390/cancers13081811.
三阴性乳腺癌中MHC II类分子的表达与肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞及干扰素信号传导相关。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0182786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182786. eCollection 2017.
4
Reprimo, a Potential p53-Dependent Tumor Suppressor Gene, Is Frequently Hypermethylated in Estrogen Receptor α-Positive Breast Cancer.Reprimo是一种潜在的p53依赖性肿瘤抑制基因,在雌激素受体α阳性乳腺癌中常发生高甲基化。
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 15;18(8):1525. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081525.
5
The Epigenomic Revolution in Breast Cancer: From Single-Gene to Genome-Wide Next-Generation Approaches.乳腺癌的表观基因组学革命:从单基因到全基因组的下一代方法。
Am J Pathol. 2017 Oct;187(10):2163-2174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
6
The Evolving Role of Companion Diagnostics for Breast Cancer in an Era of Next-Generation Omics.在下一代组学时代,伴随诊断在乳腺癌中的作用不断演变。
Am J Pathol. 2017 Oct;187(10):2185-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
7
Genome-wide methylome and chromatin interactome identify abnormal enhancer to be risk factor of breast cancer.全基因组甲基化组和染色质相互作用组确定异常增强子为乳腺癌的危险因素。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44705-44719. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18348.
8
Monitoring of Serum DNA Methylation as an Early Independent Marker of Response and Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer: TBCRC 005 Prospective Biomarker Study.监测血清DNA甲基化作为转移性乳腺癌反应和生存的早期独立标志物:TBCRC 005前瞻性生物标志物研究
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;35(7):751-758. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2080. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
9
Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.血浆 ESR1 突变与雌激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌的治疗。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):2961-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3061. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
10
Compartmentation of metabolites in regulating epigenome of cancer.代谢物在癌症表观基因组调控中的区室化作用。
Mol Med. 2016 Sep;22:349-360. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2016.00051. Epub 2016 Apr 18.