Bastl Katharina, Bastl Maximilian, Bergmann Karl-Christian, Berger Markus, Berger Uwe
Aerobiology and Pollen Information Research Unit, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Foundation German Pollen Information, Berlin, Germany.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 21;22(2):e16767. doi: 10.2196/16767.
Pollen allergies affect a significant proportion of the population globally. At present, Web-based tools such as pollen diaries and mobile apps allow for easy and fast documentation of allergic symptoms via the internet.
This study aimed to characterize the users of the Patient's Hayfever Diary (PHD), a Web-based platform and mobile app, to apply different symptom score calculations for comparison, and to evaluate the contribution of organs and medications to the total score for the first time.
The PHD users were filtered with regard to their location in Austria and Germany, significant positive correlation to the respective pollen type (birch/grass), and at least 15 entries in the respective season. Furthermore, 4 different symptom score calculation methods were applied to the datasets from 2009 until 2018, of which 2 were raw symptom scores and 2 were symptom load index (normalized) calculations. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated pairwise for these 4 symptom score calculations.
Users were mostly male and belonged to the age groups of 21 to 40 years or >40 years. User numbers have increased in the last 5 years, especially when mobile apps were made available. The Pearson correlation coefficients showed a significant linear relationship above 0.9 among the 4 symptom score datasets and thus indicated no significant difference between the different methods of symptom score calculation. The nose contributed the most to the symptom score and determined about 40% of the score.
The exact method of calculation of the symptom score is not critical. All computation methods show the same behavior (increase/decrease during the season). Therefore, the symptom load index is a useful computation method in all fields exploring pollen allergy, and Web-based diaries are a globally applicable tool to monitor the effect of pollen on human health via electronically generated symptom data.
花粉过敏影响着全球相当一部分人口。目前,基于网络的工具,如花粉日记和移动应用程序,使人们能够通过互联网轻松快速地记录过敏症状。
本研究旨在对基于网络的平台和移动应用程序“患者花粉热日记”(PHD)的用户进行特征描述,应用不同的症状评分计算方法进行比较,并首次评估器官和药物对总分的贡献。
根据用户在奥地利和德国的位置、与相应花粉类型(桦树/草)的显著正相关以及在相应季节至少有15条记录,对PHD用户进行筛选。此外,对2009年至2018年的数据集应用了4种不同的症状评分计算方法,其中2种是原始症状评分,2种是症状负荷指数(标准化)计算。对这4种症状评分计算进行两两计算Pearson相关系数。
用户大多为男性,年龄在21至40岁或40岁以上。在过去5年中,用户数量有所增加,尤其是在推出移动应用程序之后。Pearson相关系数显示,4个症状评分数据集之间的线性关系显著,相关性高于0.9,因此表明不同症状评分计算方法之间没有显著差异。鼻子对症状评分的贡献最大,约占评分的40%。
症状评分的具体计算方法并不关键。所有计算方法都表现出相同的趋势(季节期间的增加/减少)。因此,症状负荷指数是所有研究花粉过敏领域中一种有用的计算方法,基于网络的日记是一种通过电子生成的症状数据来监测花粉对人类健康影响的全球适用工具。