Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Regional Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Jeroen Bosch hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Mar 4;6(1):e14627. doi: 10.2196/14627.
The Netherlands, like most European countries, has a robust influenza surveillance system in primary care. However, there is a lack of real-time nationally representative data on hospital admissions for complications of influenza. Anecdotal information about hospital capacity problems during influenza epidemics can, therefore, not be substantiated.
The aim of this study was to assess whether media reports could provide relevant information for estimating the impact of influenza on hospital capacity, in the absence of hospital surveillance data.
Dutch news articles on influenza in hospitals during the influenza season (week 40 of 2017 until week 20 of 2018) were searched in a Web-based media monitoring program (Coosto). Trends in the number of weekly articles were compared with trends in 5 different influenza surveillance systems. A content analysis was performed on a selection of news articles, and information on the hospital, department, problem, and preventive or response measures was collected.
The trend in weekly news articles correlated significantly with the trends in all 5 surveillance systems, including severe acute respiratory infections (SARI) surveillance. However, the peak in all 5 surveillance systems preceded the peak in news articles. Content analysis showed hospitals (N=69) had major capacity problems (46/69, 67%), resulting in admission stops (9/46, 20%), postponement of nonurgent surgical procedures (29/46, 63%), or both (8/46, 17%). Only few hospitals reported the use of point-of-care testing (5/69, 7%) or a separate influenza ward (3/69, 4%) to accelerate clinical management, but most resorted to ad hoc crisis management (34/69, 49%).
Media reports showed that the 2017/2018 influenza epidemic caused serious problems in hospitals throughout the country. However, because of the time lag in media reporting, it is not a suitable alternative for near real-time SARI surveillance. A robust SARI surveillance program is important to inform decision making.
与大多数欧洲国家一样,荷兰在初级保健中拥有健全的流感监测系统。然而,缺乏关于因流感并发症而住院的全国代表性实时数据。因此,关于流感流行期间医院容量问题的传闻信息无法得到证实。
本研究旨在评估在缺乏医院监测数据的情况下,媒体报道是否可以提供有关评估流感对医院容量影响的相关信息。
在一个基于网络的媒体监测程序(Coosto)中搜索了 2017 年流感季节(第 40 周至 2018 年第 20 周)期间荷兰有关医院流感的新闻文章。比较了每周文章数量的趋势与 5 种不同流感监测系统的趋势。对部分新闻文章进行了内容分析,并收集了有关医院、科室、问题以及预防或应对措施的信息。
每周新闻文章的趋势与包括严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)监测在内的 5 种监测系统的趋势均呈显著相关。然而,在所有 5 种监测系统中,高峰期均先于新闻文章的高峰期。内容分析显示,医院(N=69)存在严重的容量问题(46/69,67%),导致入院停止(9/46,20%)、非紧急手术推迟(29/46,63%)或两者兼有(8/46,17%)。只有少数医院报告使用床边检测(5/69,7%)或单独的流感病房(3/69,4%)来加速临床管理,但大多数医院都采取了临时危机管理措施(34/69,49%)。
媒体报道表明,2017/2018 年流感流行在全国范围内给医院造成了严重问题。然而,由于媒体报道的时间滞后,它不适合作为实时 SARI 监测的替代方法。一个健全的 SARI 监测计划对于决策制定非常重要。