Departamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.
Braz J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;42(4):389-397. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0611. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
We investigated: i) the reliability and validity of a Brazilian version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), developed to detect and characterize psychotic experiences in the general population; and ii) the association between psychotic experiences, childhood adversity, and cannabis use in a population-based sample.
We performed factorial analyses and generalized linear models with CAPE scores as the dependent variable in a sample composed of 217 first-episode psychosis patients, 104 unaffected biological siblings, and 319 non-psychotic population-based participants.
After removing seven items from its positive dimension and two items from its negative dimension, a 33-item Brazilian version of the CAPE showed acceptable adjustment indices (confirmatory fit index = 0.895; goodness of fit index = 0.822; parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.761; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.055, p [RMSEA ≤ 0.05] = 0.04) and internal consistency in all its dimensions (> 0.70). Childhood adversity was associated with higher scores in all three dimensions, as well as with total score. Lifetime cannabis use was associated with higher scores only in the positive dimension.
The proposed Brazilian version of the CAPE corroborates the tridimensional approach for assessing psychosis-proneness, and the frequency and severity of psychotic manifestations are distributed as a spectrum in the general population.
我们调查了:i)一种用于检测和描述一般人群中精神病体验的巴西版《社区心理体验评估》(CAPE)的可靠性和有效性;以及 ii)在基于人群的样本中,精神病体验、童年逆境和大麻使用之间的关联。
我们对 217 名首发精神病患者、104 名未受影响的生物学兄弟姐妹和 319 名非精神病基于人群的参与者组成的样本进行了因子分析和广义线性模型,以 CAPE 分数为因变量。
在从阳性维度中删除了 7 个项目,从阴性维度中删除了 2 个项目后,巴西版 CAPE 有 33 个项目,其调整指数可接受(验证拟合指数=0.895;拟合优度指数=0.822;简约拟合优度指数=0.761;近似均方根误差 [RMSEA] = 0.055,p [RMSEA ≤ 0.05] = 0.04),且所有维度的内部一致性均较高(>0.70)。童年逆境与所有三个维度的分数较高有关,与总分也有关。终生大麻使用仅与阳性维度的分数较高有关。
所提出的巴西版 CAPE 证实了评估精神病倾向的三分法方法,精神病表现的频率和严重程度在一般人群中呈连续谱分布。