• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of the Portuguese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and characterization of psychotic experiences in a Brazilian sample.验证葡萄牙语版的《精神体验社区评估》以及对巴西样本中精神体验的特征描述。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;42(4):389-397. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0611. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Validation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) in an adolescent general population.社区心理体验评估量表(CAPE)中文版在青少年一般人群中的验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Apr;26:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
3
Internal structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-Positive (CAPE-P15) scale: Evidence for a general factor.精神体验社区评估-积极版(CAPE-P15)量表的内部结构:一般因素的证据
Schizophr Res. 2015 Jul;165(2-3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
4
Validation of the Community Assessment Psychic Experiences -42 (CAPE-42) in Spanish college students and patients with psychosis.社区评估精神体验量表-42(CAPE-42)在西班牙大学生和精神病患者中的效度验证
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2012 Jul-Aug;40(4):169-76. Epub 2012 Jul 1.
5
The other side of recovery: validation of the Portuguese version of the subjective experiences of psychosis scale.康复的另一面:葡萄牙语版精神病主观体验量表的验证
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:246. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0634-3.
6
Psychometric Properties of "Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences": Review and Meta-analyses.《“心理体验的社区评估”的心理测量特性:综述与荟萃分析》
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):34-44. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv088. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
Current CAPE-15: a measure of recent psychotic-like experiences and associated distress.当前的CAPE-15:一种衡量近期类精神病体验及相关痛苦的指标。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;11(5):411-417. doi: 10.1111/eip.12245. Epub 2015 May 12.
8
Brief screening for psychosis-like experiences.简要精神分裂样体验筛查。
Schizophr Res. 2013 Sep;149(1-3):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
9
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
10
Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).评估心理体验社区评估量表(CAPE)在跨国间的不变性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Nov;49(15):2600-2607. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003574. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Distress, burden, and wellbeing in siblings of people with mental illness: a mixed studies systematic review and meta-analysis.精神疾病患者的兄弟姐妹的困扰、负担和幸福感:一项混合研究系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Nov;53(15):6945-6964. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001733. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
2
Validation of the Korean Version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in General Population.一般人群心理体验社区评估韩国版的验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Jul;20(7):625-634. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0011. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
3
Subclinical psychotic symptoms in Indian adults: Application of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).印度成年人的亚临床精神病症状:社区心理体验评估 (CAPE) 的应用。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Mar;81:103451. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2023.103451. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
4
Exploring the effectiveness of family-based interventions for psychosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.探索家庭为基础的干预措施在中低收入国家治疗精神病的效果:系统综述。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;57(9):1749-1769. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02309-8. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Urbanicity and risk of first-episode psychosis: incidence study in Brazil.城市性与首发精神病风险:巴西的一项发病研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;215(6):726-729. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.110.
2
Examining the independent and joint effects of molecular genetic liability and environmental exposures in schizophrenia: results from the EUGEI study.探究精神分裂症中分子遗传易感性与环境暴露的独立及联合效应:EUGEI研究结果
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):173-182. doi: 10.1002/wps.20629.
3
Barriers and facilitators to employment for young adults with mental illness: a scoping review.患有精神疾病的年轻人就业的障碍与促进因素:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 18;8(12):e024487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024487.
4
Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).评估心理体验社区评估量表(CAPE)在跨国间的不变性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Nov;49(15):2600-2607. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003574. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
Treated Incidence of Psychotic Disorders in the Multinational EU-GEI Study.在欧盟多中心基因与环境相互作用(EU-GEI)研究中精神病性障碍的治疗发病率。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 1;75(1):36-46. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3554.
6
The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences measures nine clusters of psychosis-like experiences: A validation of the German version of the CAPE.《精神体验社区评估量表》测量九类类似精神病的体验:德语版CAPE的效度验证。
Schizophr Res. 2015 Dec;169(1-3):274-279. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.10.034. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
7
Impact of Different Childhood Adversities on 1-Year Outcomes of Psychotic Disorder in the Genetics and Psychosis Study.遗传学与精神病研究中不同童年逆境对精神障碍1年预后的影响
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Mar;42(2):464-75. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv131. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Psychometric Properties of "Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences": Review and Meta-analyses.《“心理体验的社区评估”的心理测量特性:综述与荟萃分析》
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):34-44. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv088. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Psychotic Experiences in the General Population: A Cross-National Analysis Based on 31,261 Respondents From 18 Countries.普通人群中的精神病性体验:基于来自18个国家的31261名受访者的跨国分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;72(7):697-705. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0575.
10
Change in cannabis use in the general population: a longitudinal study on the impact on psychotic experiences.普通人群中大麻使用情况的变化:一项关于对精神病体验影响的纵向研究。
Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2014.04.023. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

验证葡萄牙语版的《精神体验社区评估》以及对巴西样本中精神体验的特征描述。

Validation of the Portuguese version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences and characterization of psychotic experiences in a Brazilian sample.

机构信息

Departamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Braz J Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;42(4):389-397. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0611. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1590/1516-4446-2019-0611
PMID:32130403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7430378/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated: i) the reliability and validity of a Brazilian version of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE), developed to detect and characterize psychotic experiences in the general population; and ii) the association between psychotic experiences, childhood adversity, and cannabis use in a population-based sample.

METHODS

We performed factorial analyses and generalized linear models with CAPE scores as the dependent variable in a sample composed of 217 first-episode psychosis patients, 104 unaffected biological siblings, and 319 non-psychotic population-based participants.

RESULTS

After removing seven items from its positive dimension and two items from its negative dimension, a 33-item Brazilian version of the CAPE showed acceptable adjustment indices (confirmatory fit index = 0.895; goodness of fit index = 0.822; parsimony goodness of fit index = 0.761; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.055, p [RMSEA ≤ 0.05] = 0.04) and internal consistency in all its dimensions (> 0.70). Childhood adversity was associated with higher scores in all three dimensions, as well as with total score. Lifetime cannabis use was associated with higher scores only in the positive dimension.

CONCLUSION

The proposed Brazilian version of the CAPE corroborates the tridimensional approach for assessing psychosis-proneness, and the frequency and severity of psychotic manifestations are distributed as a spectrum in the general population.

摘要

目的

我们调查了:i)一种用于检测和描述一般人群中精神病体验的巴西版《社区心理体验评估》(CAPE)的可靠性和有效性;以及 ii)在基于人群的样本中,精神病体验、童年逆境和大麻使用之间的关联。

方法

我们对 217 名首发精神病患者、104 名未受影响的生物学兄弟姐妹和 319 名非精神病基于人群的参与者组成的样本进行了因子分析和广义线性模型,以 CAPE 分数为因变量。

结果

在从阳性维度中删除了 7 个项目,从阴性维度中删除了 2 个项目后,巴西版 CAPE 有 33 个项目,其调整指数可接受(验证拟合指数=0.895;拟合优度指数=0.822;简约拟合优度指数=0.761;近似均方根误差 [RMSEA] = 0.055,p [RMSEA ≤ 0.05] = 0.04),且所有维度的内部一致性均较高(>0.70)。童年逆境与所有三个维度的分数较高有关,与总分也有关。终生大麻使用仅与阳性维度的分数较高有关。

结论

所提出的巴西版 CAPE 证实了评估精神病倾向的三分法方法,精神病表现的频率和严重程度在一般人群中呈连续谱分布。