• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字医患沟通工具的内容和系统开发,以支持慢性病医疗中的共同决策:InvolveMe。

Content and system development of a digital patient-provider communication tool to support shared decision making in chronic health care: InvolveMe.

机构信息

Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1065-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-020-1065-8
PMID:32131808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7057594/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic conditions present major health problems, affecting an increasing number of individuals who experience a variety of symptoms that impact their health related quality of life. Digital tools can be of support in chronic conditions, potentially improving patient-provider communication, promoting shared decision making for treatment and care, and possibly even improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to develop a digital tool for patient-provider communication in chronic health care settings and describes the data collection and subsequent content and software development of the InvolveMe tool. InvolveMe will provide patients with the opportunity to report symptoms and preferences to their health care providers (HCP), and to use secure messaging to interact with the HCPs.

METHOD

The study employed a combination of interviews with patients with chronic conditions and focus groups with HCPs, examining experiences with chronic conditions and the potential use of a digital tool for support. Participants were recruited from two outpatient clinics at a university hospital. Data collected from interviews and focus groups were analysed using thematic analysis. Content and software development was informed by the data collection and by tool development workshops.

RESULTS

Analyses from interviews with patients (n = 14) and focus groups with HCPs (n = 11) generated three main themes: 1) Making symptoms and challenges visible, 2) Mastering a new life, and 3) Digital opportunities for follow-up. Each main theme generated separate subthemes. Theme 1 and 2 gave input for content development of the symptom and needs assessment part of the tool, while theme 3 provided ideas for the software development of the InvolveMe tool. Tool development workshops with patients (n = 6) and HCPs (n = 6) supplemented the development.

CONCLUSIONS

A digital tool such as InvolveMe has the potential to support shared decision making for patients with chronic health conditions. Through integration with an existing patient portal such a tool can provide opportunities for meaningful interactions and communication between patients and HCP's, particularly with regards to symptoms, needs and preferences for care.

摘要

背景

慢性病带来了重大的健康问题,影响了越来越多的患者,他们经历着各种影响其健康相关生活质量的症状。数字工具在慢性病管理中能起到支持作用,可能改善医患沟通,促进治疗和护理的共同决策,并可能改善患者的预后。本研究旨在开发一种用于慢性病医疗保健环境的医患沟通数字工具,并描述了 InvolveMe 工具的数据收集以及随后的内容和软件开发。InvolveMe 将为患者提供向医疗保健提供者(HCP)报告症状和偏好的机会,并使用安全消息传递与 HCP 进行互动。

方法

该研究采用了对慢性病患者的访谈和 HCP 的焦点小组相结合的方法,考察了慢性病的经历以及数字工具支持的潜在用途。参与者是从一家大学医院的两个门诊诊所招募的。从访谈和焦点小组中收集的数据采用主题分析进行分析。内容和软件开发是基于数据收集和工具开发研讨会进行的。

结果

对患者(n=14)访谈和 HCP 焦点小组(n=11)的分析产生了三个主要主题:1)使症状和挑战可见,2)掌握新的生活,3)数字随访机会。每个主要主题都产生了单独的子主题。主题 1 和 2 为工具的症状和需求评估部分的内容开发提供了投入,而主题 3 为 InvolveMe 工具的软件开发提供了思路。与患者(n=6)和 HCP(n=6)的工具开发研讨会补充了开发工作。

结论

像 InvolveMe 这样的数字工具有可能支持慢性病患者的共同决策。通过与现有的患者门户集成,此类工具可以为患者和 HCP 之间提供有意义的互动和沟通机会,特别是在症状、护理需求和偏好方面。

相似文献

1
Content and system development of a digital patient-provider communication tool to support shared decision making in chronic health care: InvolveMe.数字医患沟通工具的内容和系统开发,以支持慢性病医疗中的共同决策:InvolveMe。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1065-8.
2
Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study.一项支持慢性医疗保健中共同决策的数字患者-医疗服务提供者沟通干预措施(InvolveMe)的可行性:试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(4):e34738. doi: 10.2196/34738.
3
A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers.数字化医患沟通干预措施(InvolveMe):基于已确定的促进因素和障碍的实施准备情况的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 8;23(4):e22399. doi: 10.2196/22399.
4
eHealth Technologies, Multimorbidity, and the Office Visit: Qualitative Interview Study on the Perspectives of Physicians and Nurses.电子健康技术、多重疾病与门诊诊疗:关于医生和护士观点的定性访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 26;20(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8983.
5
Exploring the barriers and facilitators for the use of digital health technologies for the management of COPD: a qualitative study of clinician perceptions.探索使用数字健康技术管理 COPD 的障碍和促进因素:临床医生认知的定性研究。
QJM. 2020 Mar 1;113(3):163-172. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz241.
6
Improving patient-provider communication about chronic pain: development and feasibility testing of a shared decision-making tool.改善医患双方关于慢性疼痛的沟通:一种共享决策工具的开发和可行性测试。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 17;20(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01279-8.
7
Patient participation in tele-emergencies - experiences from healthcare professionals in northern rural Sweden.患者参与远程急救——瑞典北部农村地区医护人员的经验
Rural Remote Health. 2022 Dec;22(4):7404. doi: 10.22605/RRH7404. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
8
Examining Healthcare Professionals' Communication Around Decision-Making with Internet-Informed Patients.检查医疗保健专业人员与互联网知情患者进行决策沟通的情况。
Health Commun. 2024 May;39(6):1094-1101. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2204580. Epub 2023 May 7.
9
User-Centered Design of a Web-Based Tool to Support Management of Chemotherapy-Related Toxicities in Cancer Patients.以患者为中心设计基于网络的工具,以支持癌症患者化疗相关毒性的管理。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 28;21(3):e9958. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9958.
10
eHealth, Participatory Medicine, and Ethical Care: A Focus Group Study of Patients' and Health Care Providers' Use of Health-Related Internet Information.电子健康、参与式医疗与伦理关怀:一项关于患者及医疗服务提供者对健康相关互联网信息使用情况的焦点小组研究
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 22;17(6):e155. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3792.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring professionals' experiences with secure messaging in Dutch outpatient clinics: emerging differences in use frequencies and types across medical specialties.探索荷兰门诊诊所专业人员使用安全消息传递的经历:各医学专科在使用频率和类型上出现的差异
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03081-w.
2
Integrating general practitioners' and patients' perspectives in the development of a digital tool supporting primary care for older patients with multimorbidity: a focus group study.在开发支持患有多种疾病的老年患者初级保健的数字工具过程中整合全科医生和患者的观点:一项焦点小组研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 21;7:1499333. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1499333. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Decision aids that facilitate elements of shared decision making in chronic illnesses: a systematic review.促进慢性病共同决策要素的决策辅助工具:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 May 20;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1034-4.
2
The influence of mobile health applications on patient - healthcare provider relationships: A systematic, narrative review.移动医疗应用对医患关系的影响:系统、叙事性综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jun;102(6):1080-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.
Looking beyond the eyes of the patient: The importance of effective communication in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration.
超越患者的视角:有效沟通在年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗中的重要性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;103(2):205-214. doi: 10.1111/aos.16777. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Systematic review on the involvement and engagement of patients as advisers for the organisation of organ transplantation services.系统评价患者作为顾问参与和参与器官移植服务组织的情况。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 10;13(5):e072091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072091.
5
Development of a Digital Tool for People With a Long-Term Condition Using Stroke as a Case Example: Participatory Design Approach.以中风为例,为患有长期疾病的人群开发数字工具:参与式设计方法。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 3;9(2):e35478. doi: 10.2196/35478.
6
Research on Digital Technology Use in Cardiology: Bibliometric Analysis.数字技术在心脏病学中的应用研究:文献计量分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 11;24(5):e36086. doi: 10.2196/36086.
7
Feasibility of a Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention to Support Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Health Care, InvolveMe: Pilot Study.一项支持慢性医疗保健中共同决策的数字患者-医疗服务提供者沟通干预措施(InvolveMe)的可行性:试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Apr 7;6(4):e34738. doi: 10.2196/34738.
8
Stakeholders' Perspectives on Partnering to Inform the Software Development Lifecycle of Smartphone Applications for People with Serious Mental Illness: Enhancing the Software Development Lifecycle Through Stakeholder Engagement.利益相关者对合作以指导严重精神疾病患者智能手机应用软件开发生命周期的看法:通过利益相关者参与增强软件开发生命周期
Proc IEEE Glob Humanit Technol Conf. 2021 Oct;2021:195-199. doi: 10.1109/ghtc53159.2021.9612444. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
9
Usability Testing of a Mobile Health Application for Self-Management of Serious Mental Illness in a Norwegian Community Mental Health Setting.移动医疗应用程序在挪威社区心理健康环境中用于严重精神疾病自我管理的可用性测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;18(16):8667. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168667.
10
A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers.数字化医患沟通干预措施(InvolveMe):基于已确定的促进因素和障碍的实施准备情况的定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 8;23(4):e22399. doi: 10.2196/22399.
GRIPP2报告清单:用于改善患者和公众参与研究报告的工具。
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Aug 2;3:13. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0062-2. eCollection 2017.
4
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review.成年慢性肾脏病患者使用的患者报告结局量表(PROMs)的测量属性:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 21;12(6):e0179733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179733. eCollection 2017.
5
The Influence of Doctor-Patient Communication on Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review.医患沟通对健康结局的影响:一项系统综述。
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2017 Jun;63(2):131-150. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2017.63.2.131.
6
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
7
What Is Shared Decision Making? (and What It Is Not).什么是共同决策?(以及它不是什么)。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;23(12):1320-1324. doi: 10.1111/acem.13065. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
8
Experiences of long-term life-limiting conditions among patients and carers: what can we learn from a meta-review of systematic reviews of qualitative studies of chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic kidney disease?患者及护理人员长期面临生命受限状况的经历:从对慢性心力衰竭、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和慢性肾病定性研究的系统评价的元评价中我们能学到什么?
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 5;6(10):e011694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011694.
9
The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review.自我管理手机和平板应用程序在长期疾病管理中的有效性:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 16;18(5):e97. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4883.
10
Shared Decision Making: The Need For Patient-Clinician Conversation, Not Just Information.共同决策:需要医患对话,而非仅仅提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):627-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1354.