• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组研究与临床实践的交汇点。

Navigating the Intersection between Genomic Research and Clinical Practice.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Mar;13(3):219-222. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0267.

DOI:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0267
PMID:32132115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7080295/
Abstract

The Risk Assessment Program (RAP) at Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia, PA) is a multi-generational prospective cohort, enhanced for personal and family history of cancer, consisting of over 10,000 individuals for whom data on personal and family history of cancer, risk factors, genetic and genomic data, health behaviors, and biospecimens are available. The RAP has a broad research agenda including the characterization of genes with known or potential relevance to cancer, gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, and their contribution to clinically useful risk assessment and risk reduction strategies. Increasingly, this body of research is identifying genetic changes which may have clinical significance for RAP research participants, leading us to confront the issue of whether to return genetic results emerging from research laboratories. This review will describe some of the important fundamental points that must be debated as we develop a paradigm for return of research results. The key issues to address as the scientific community moves toward adopting a policy of return of research results include the best criteria for determining which results to offer, the consent document components necessary to ensure that the participant makes a truly informed decision about receiving their results, and associated logistical and cost challenges..

摘要

福克斯蔡斯癌症中心(费城,宾夕法尼亚州)的风险评估计划(RAP)是一个多代前瞻性队列,针对癌症个人和家族史进行了增强,包括超过 10000 个人,他们提供了有关癌症个人和家族史、风险因素、遗传和基因组数据、健康行为和生物样本的数据。RAP 有广泛的研究议程,包括具有已知或潜在癌症相关性的基因特征、基因-基因和基因-环境相互作用,以及它们对临床有用的风险评估和降低风险策略的贡献。越来越多的研究正在确定可能对 RAP 研究参与者具有临床意义的遗传变化,这使我们不得不面对从研究实验室中出现的遗传结果是否要返回的问题。本综述将描述在我们制定研究结果返回范例时必须争论的一些重要要点。随着科学界朝着返回研究结果的政策发展,需要解决的关键问题包括确定要提供哪些结果的最佳标准、确保参与者对接收结果做出真正知情决策所需的同意书组成部分,以及相关的后勤和成本挑战。

相似文献

1
Navigating the Intersection between Genomic Research and Clinical Practice.基因组研究与临床实践的交汇点。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Mar;13(3):219-222. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0267.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
3
Ethics and genomic medicine, how to navigate decisions in surgical oncology.伦理与基因组医学,如何在外科肿瘤学中做出决策
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan;111(1):18-23. doi: 10.1002/jso.23771. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
4
Genomic test validation for incidental findings.偶然发现的基因组检测验证
Clin Chem. 2014 Feb;60(2):292-3. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2013.210609. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
5
From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making.从遗传学到基因组学:伦理、政策和父母决策。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul;34(6):639-47. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsn075. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
6
Genetic testing for susceptibility to adult-onset cancer. The process and content of informed consent.成人期发病癌症易感性的基因检测。知情同意的过程与内容。
JAMA. 1997 May 14;277(18):1467-74.
7
Genomic Contextualism: Shifting the Rhetoric of Genetic Exceptionalism.基因组语境主义:转变遗传例外主义的修辞。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Jan;19(1):51-63. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1544304.
8
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.向研究参与者的亲属反馈基因组结果:分析与建议。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
9
How do clinical genetics consent forms address the familial approach to confidentiality and incidental findings? A mixed-methods study.临床遗传学同意书如何处理保密和偶发发现的家族性方法?一项混合方法研究。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Jan;17(1):155-166. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-9994-9.
10
How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?儿童和青少年对基因检测、父母获取其检测结果以及父母将这些结果告知他人有多少控制权?
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):538-44. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12296.

引用本文的文献

1
Foresight in clinical proteomics: current status, ethical considerations, and future perspectives.临床蛋白质组学的前瞻性:现状、伦理考量及未来展望。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Nov 1;3:59. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15810.1. eCollection 2023.
2
Ethical Principles, Constraints and Opportunities in Clinical Proteomics.临床蛋白质组学中的伦理原则、限制因素与机遇
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2021 Jan 14;20:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100046.

本文引用的文献

1
Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?个体基因组研究结果的返还:法律法规是否跟上步伐?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr;27(4):535-546. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0311-3. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
CORRIGENDUM: ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.勘误:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会关于临床外显子组和基因组测序中偶然发现报告的建议。
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):606. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.18.
3
Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.临床外显子组和基因组测序中次要发现报告的建议,2016年更新版(美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会次要发现v2.0):美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会政策声明
Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):249-255. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
4
A Family-Centered Model for Sharing Genetic Risk.一种用于共享遗传风险的以家庭为中心的模式。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):545-51. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12297.
5
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.向研究参与者的亲属反馈基因组结果:分析与建议。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
6
Ethical issues raised by whole genome sequencing.全基因组测序引发的伦理问题。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;28(2):269-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
7
Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.基因组研究中偶然发现结果的告知同意。
Genet Med. 2014 May;16(5):367-73. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.145. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
8
How do researchers manage genetic results in practice? The experience of the multinational Colon Cancer Family Registry.研究人员在实际操作中如何处理基因检测结果?多国结肠癌家族登记处的经验。
J Community Genet. 2014 Apr;5(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s12687-013-0148-y. Epub 2013 May 24.
9
Informed Consent in Genome-Scale Research: What Do Prospective Participants Think?基因组规模研究中的知情同意:潜在参与者怎么看?
AJOB Prim Res. 2012 Jul 1;3(3):3-11. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2012.662575. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
10
Informed consent for whole-genome sequencing studies in the clinical setting. Proposed recommendations on essential content and process.临床环境中全基因组测序研究的知情同意。关于基本内容和流程的建议。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2013 Oct;21(10):1054-9. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.297. Epub 2013 Jan 16.