Durukan Duygu, Read Tim R H, Bradshaw Catriona S, Fairley Christopher K, Williamson Deborah A, De Petra Vesna, Maddaford Kate, Wigan Rebecca, Chen Marcus Y, Tran Anne, Chow Eric P F
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 23;58(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01969-19.
Screening for and at the pharyngeal, urogenital, and anorectal sites is recommended for men who have sex with men (MSM). Combining the three individual-site samples into a single pooled sample could result in significant cost savings, provided there is no significant sensitivity reduction. The aim of this study was to examine the sensitivity of pooled samples for detecting chlamydia and gonorrhea in asymptomatic MSM using a nucleic acid amplification test. Asymptomatic MSM who tested positive for chlamydia or gonorrhoea were invited to participate. Paired samples were obtained from participants prior to administration of treatment. To form the pooled sample, the anorectal swab was agitated in the urine specimen transport tube and then discarded. The pharyngeal swab and 2 ml of urine sample were then added to the tube. The difference in sensitivity between testing of pooled samples and individual-site testing was calculated against an expanded gold standard, where an individual is considered positive if either pooled-sample or individual-site testing returns a positive result. All samples were tested using the Aptima Combo 2 assay. A total of 162 MSM were enrolled in the study. Sensitivities of pooled-sample testing were 86% (94/109; 95% confidence interval [CI], 79 to 92%]) for chlamydia and 91% (73/80; 95% CI, 83 to 96%) for gonorrhea. The sensitivity reduction was significant for chlamydia ( = 0.02) but not for gonorrhea ( = 0.34). Pooling caused 22 infections (15 chlamydia and 7 gonorrhoea) to be missed, and the majority were single-site infections (19/22). Pooling urogenital and extragenital samples from asymptomatic MSM reduced the sensitivity of detection by approximately 10% for chlamydia but not for gonorrhea.
建议对男男性行为者(MSM)进行咽部、泌尿生殖道和肛门直肠部位的衣原体和淋病筛查。如果不显著降低灵敏度,将三个单独部位的样本合并为一个混合样本可显著节省成本。本研究的目的是使用核酸扩增试验检测无症状MSM中混合样本检测衣原体和淋病的灵敏度。邀请衣原体或淋病检测呈阳性的无症状MSM参与。在给予治疗前从参与者处获取配对样本。为形成混合样本,将肛门直肠拭子在尿液标本运输管中搅动,然后丢弃。然后将咽部拭子和2毫升尿液样本加入管中。根据扩展金标准计算混合样本检测与单个部位检测之间的灵敏度差异,即如果混合样本或单个部位检测结果为阳性,则个体被视为阳性。所有样本均使用Aptima Combo 2检测法进行检测。共有162名MSM纳入研究。混合样本检测衣原体的灵敏度为86%(94/109;95%置信区间[CI],79%至92%),淋病为91%(73/80;95%CI,83%至96%)。衣原体的灵敏度降低显著(P = 0.02),但淋病不显著(P = 0.34)。合并导致22例感染(15例衣原体和7例淋病)漏检,大多数为单部位感染(19/22)。合并无症状MSM的泌尿生殖道和生殖器外样本,衣原体检测灵敏度降低约10%,但淋病未降低。