Department of Software, School of Computer Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Neuro Imaging and Analysis Group (NIAG), Research Center for Molecular and Cellular Imaging (RCMCI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Spinal Cord. 2020 Jul;58(7):811-820. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0429-3. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Method development.
To develop a reliable protocol for automatic segmentation of Thoracolumbar spinal cord using MRI based on K-means clustering algorithm in 3D images.
University-based laboratory, Tehran, Iran.
T2 structural volumes acquired from the spinal cord of 20 uninjured volunteers on a 3T MR scanner. We proposed an automatic method for spinal cord segmentation based on the K-means clustering algorithm in 3D images and compare our results with two available segmentation methods (PropSeg, DeepSeg) implemented in the Spinal Cord Toolbox. Dice and Hausdorff were used to compare the results of our method (K-Seg) with the manual segmentation, PropSeg, and DeepSeg.
The accuracy of our automatic segmentation method for T2-weighted images was significantly better or similar to the SCT methods, in terms of 3D DC (p < 0.001). The 3D DCs were respectively (0.81 ± 0.04) and Hausdorff Distance (12.3 ± 2.48) by the K-Seg method in contrary to other SCT methods for T2-weighted images.
The output with similar protocols showed that K-Seg results match the manual segmentation better than the other methods especially on the thoracolumbar levels in the spinal cord due to the low image contrast as a result of poor SNR in these areas.
方法开发。
开发一种基于 K-均值聚类算法的可靠的胸腰椎脊髓 MRI 自动分割协议。
伊朗德黑兰的一所大学的实验室。
在 3T 磁共振扫描仪上对 20 名未受伤志愿者的脊髓采集 T2 结构容积。我们提出了一种基于 3D 图像 K-均值聚类算法的脊髓自动分割方法,并将我们的结果与两种现有的分割方法(PropSeg、DeepSeg)进行比较,这些方法都实现于脊髓工具箱中。使用 Dice 和 Hausdorff 比较我们的方法(K-Seg)与手动分割、PropSeg 和 DeepSeg 的结果。
在 T2 加权图像方面,我们的自动分割方法的准确性明显优于或类似于 SCT 方法,在三维 DC 方面(p<0.001)。在 T2 加权图像方面,K-Seg 方法的三维 DCs 分别为(0.81±0.04)和 Hausdorff 距离(12.3±2.48),而其他 SCT 方法的三维 DCs 则分别为(0.81±0.04)和 Hausdorff 距离(12.3±2.48)。
在类似的协议下,与其他方法相比,K-Seg 的结果与手动分割更为匹配,特别是在脊髓的胸腰椎水平,因为这些区域的 SNR 较低,导致图像对比度较差。