Canning Jessica R, Patock-Peckham Julie A, Walters Kyle J, Bauman D C, Frohe Tessa, Leeman Robert F
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287.
Pers Individ Dif. 2020 Jun 1;159. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109909. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
Self-Discrepancy Theory (Higgins, 1987) predicts that the difference between the and the self will be associated with impaired-control-over-drinking (IC; dysregulated drinking beyond one's own limits) as well as alcohol-related-problems. According to Slaney et al. (2001) perfectionism is a multi-faceted personality trait which represents both adaptive (e.g. high-standards) and maladaptive (e.g. discrepancy) aspects. In particular, discrepancy has been associated with poorer coping approaches, which may suggest a Self-Medication route to IC. Yet, to date, no one has examined whether drinking-motives (e.g., social, enhancement, coping and conformity) mediate the relations between discrepancy and high standards and alcohol-outcomes such as IC. We used a structural equation model to test indirect associations of discrepancy and high-standards to both heavy-episodic-drinking and alcohol-related-problems through the mediating mechanisms of drinking-motives and IC. Results supported the distinction between discrepancy and high-standards consistent with the Self-Medication Hypothesis (Hersh & Hussong, 2009). Discrepancy was associated with poorer alcohol-outcomes through greater coping-motives, conformity-motives and IC. In contrast, higher-standards were associated with fewer alcohol-outcomes through less coping-motives, conformity-motives, and IC. This study illustrates the importance of personality factors such as discrepancy in the development of problematic alcohol-use suggesting that it might be a good target for intervention.
自我差异理论(希金斯,1987年)预测,实际自我与理想自我之间的差异将与饮酒控制受损(IC;饮酒超出自身限度且失调)以及与酒精相关的问题有关。根据斯莱尼等人(2001年)的研究,完美主义是一种多面的人格特质,它既代表适应性方面(如高标准),也代表适应不良方面(如差异)。特别是,差异与较差的应对方式有关,这可能暗示了一种自我用药导致饮酒控制受损的途径。然而,迄今为止,没有人研究过饮酒动机(如社交、增强、应对和从众)是否介导了差异和高标准与诸如饮酒控制受损等酒精相关结果之间的关系。我们使用结构方程模型来检验差异和高标准通过饮酒动机和饮酒控制受损的中介机制与重度饮酒和酒精相关问题之间的间接关联。结果支持了与自我用药假说(赫什和胡松,2009年)一致的差异和高标准之间的区别。差异通过更强的应对动机、从众动机和饮酒控制受损与较差的酒精相关结果有关。相比之下,更高的标准通过更少的应对动机、从众动机和饮酒控制受损与更少的酒精相关结果有关。这项研究说明了差异等人格因素在问题性饮酒发展中的重要性,表明它可能是一个很好的干预目标。