Suppr超能文献

3种不同正畸矫治器治疗患者的疼痛程度比较——一项随机试验

Comparison of pain levels in patients treated with 3 different orthodontic appliances - a randomized trial.

作者信息

Diddige Rajasri, Negi Gunjan, Kiran Kanamarlapudi Venkata Sai, Chitra Prasad

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Army College of Dental Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Med Pharm Rep. 2020 Jan;93(1):81-88. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1311. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To compare pain levels experienced during initial alignment with three different orthodontic appliance types and to correlate pain with male and female differences, if any.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized 3-arm parallel trial allocated 36 adult orthodontic patients into three appliance groups: MBT 0.022" slot (Mini Twin, Ormco, Glendora, USA), self ligating 0.022" slot Damon 3MX (Ormco, Glendora, USA) and clear aligners (Smile align, Mumbai, India). The level of discomfort was assessed through a questionnaire based on the visual analogue scale at four hours, twenty four hours, third and seventh day after appliance placement.

RESULTS

Patients treated with clear aligners reported less pain than patients treated with conventional and self ligating fixed appliances. Patients treated with MBT conventional appliances showed greater pain levels than Damon appliances. A significantly higher visual analogue scale score was observed at 24 hours and the least visual analogue scale scores on the seventh day post appliance placement.

CONCLUSION

During the first week of orthodontic treatment, patients treated with clear aligners reported lower pain than those treated with conventional and self-ligating appliances.

摘要

背景与目的

比较使用三种不同类型正畸矫治器进行初始排齐时所经历的疼痛程度,并探讨疼痛与性别差异(若存在)之间的相关性。

方法

一项前瞻性、随机三臂平行试验将36名成年正畸患者分为三个矫治器组:MBT 0.022英寸槽沟矫治器(Mini Twin,奥美科,美国加利福尼亚州格伦多拉)、自锁0.022英寸槽沟Damon 3MX矫治器(奥美科,美国加利福尼亚州格伦多拉)和透明矫治器(Smile align,印度孟买)。在矫治器佩戴后4小时、24小时、第3天和第7天,通过基于视觉模拟量表的问卷评估不适程度。

结果

使用透明矫治器治疗的患者报告的疼痛程度低于使用传统和自锁固定矫治器治疗的患者。使用MBT传统矫治器治疗的患者疼痛程度高于Damon矫治器治疗的患者。在矫治器佩戴后24小时观察到视觉模拟量表评分显著更高,而在第7天视觉模拟量表评分最低。

结论

在正畸治疗的第一周,使用透明矫治器治疗的患者报告的疼痛程度低于使用传统和自锁矫治器治疗的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f278/7051823/3d8db3f32b15/cm-93-81f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验