Suppr超能文献

尝试性词元提取是一把双刃剑:在反复词汇提取中促进和干扰。

Attempted prime retrieval is a double-edged sword: Facilitation and disruption in repeated lexical retrieval.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1505-1532. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000827. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Abstract

The phenomenological experience of lexical retrieval often involves repeated, active attempts to retrieve phonologically and/or semantically related information. However, the influence of these multiple retrieval attempts on subsequent lexical retrieval is presently unknown. We investigated the influence of passively viewing or actively retrieving different types of information at the critical moment preceding lexical retrieval through a novel priming paradigm. Participants attempted to retrieve target words (e.g., abdicate) from low-frequency descriptions (e.g., to formally renounce a throne). Target retrieval was preceded by passive viewing (Experiment 1), or active retrieval of the prime word (Experiments 2-6). Primes were either "both" semantically and phonologically related (e.g., abandon), only phonologically related (e.g., abdomen), only semantically related (e.g., resign), or unrelated (e.g., obvious) to the target word. When primes were passively viewed, phonological facilitation in target retrieval accuracy was observed. In contrast, when participants actively attempted to retrieve primes from their definitions, no phonological facilitation was observed. Successful retrieval of semantic and both primes facilitated subsequent target retrieval, whereas, failure to retrieve semantic and both primes inhibited subsequent target retrieval. These facilitatory and inhibitory influences of prime retrieval for semantic and both primes were independent of feedback on retrieval performance (Experiment 4) and participants' overall knowledge of the primes and targets (Experiment 5), and also did not extend to retrieval from episodic memory (Experiment 6). The findings are consistent with ongoing retrospective processes during target retrieval, which reengage prime retrieval success or failure and consequently produce benefits and costs during repeated retrieval from semantic memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

词汇检索的现象学体验通常涉及反复、主动地尝试检索语音和/或语义相关的信息。然而,目前尚不清楚这些多次检索尝试对随后的词汇检索有何影响。我们通过一种新颖的启动范式研究了在词汇检索的关键时刻被动观看或主动检索不同类型信息对词汇检索的影响。参与者试图从低频描述(例如,正式放弃王位)中检索目标词(例如 abdicate)。在目标词检索之前,有被动观看(实验 1)或主动检索启动词(实验 2-6)两种情况。启动词与目标词在语义和语音上均相关(例如,abandon)、仅在语音上相关(例如,abdomen)、仅在语义上相关(例如,resign)或与目标词无关(例如,obvious)。当启动词被被动观看时,目标词检索的准确性会出现语音促进现象。相比之下,当参与者主动尝试从其定义中检索启动词时,没有观察到语音促进现象。成功检索语义和启动词都促进了随后的目标词检索,而未能检索语义和启动词都抑制了随后的目标词检索。这些语义和启动词检索的促进和抑制影响与检索表现的反馈无关(实验 4)和参与者对启动词和目标词的整体知识(实验 5),也不会扩展到情节记忆检索(实验 6)。这些发现与目标检索过程中的持续回溯过程一致,这些回溯过程重新涉及启动词检索的成功或失败,并在从语义记忆中进行重复检索时产生收益和成本。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验