• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激活总和:来自语义记忆中收敛和发散的多个启动刺激的证据。

Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory.

作者信息

Balota D A, Paul S T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jul;22(4):827-45. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.4.827.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.22.4.827
PMID:8708602
Abstract

Six experiments addressed the combinatorial influence of multiple related primes in naming, lexical decision and relatedness judgment performance. Primes either converged on a single semantic representation (e.g., LION-STRIPES-TIGER) or diverged onto distinct semantic representations (e.g., KIDNEY-PIANO-ORGAN). The facilitatory influence of 2 related primes was well predicted by the sum of the influences from the single-related-prime conditions (a) for both convergent and divergent primes, (b) in lexical-decision and naming, (c) across varying prime-target stimulus onset asynchronies, and (d) under target-degradation conditions that increased the priming effects. The relatedness-judgment task yielded an additive pattern of priming for convergent prime conditions; however, an underadditive pattern of priming was found for divergent prime conditions. Discussion focuses on the role of attentional systems that modulate the type of information used to perform a given task.

摘要

六项实验探讨了多个相关启动词在命名、词汇判断及相关性判断任务表现中的组合影响。启动词要么汇聚于单一语义表征(如“狮子 - 条纹 - 老虎”),要么分散至不同语义表征(如“肾脏 - 钢琴 - 器官”)。对于(a)汇聚型和分散型启动词、(b)词汇判断和命名任务、(c)不同的启动词 - 目标刺激起始异步条件,以及(d)在增强启动效应的目标降解条件下,两个相关启动词的促进作用能很好地由单个相关启动词条件的影响之和预测。相关性判断任务在汇聚型启动词条件下产生了累加性的启动模式;然而,在分散型启动词条件下发现了启动不足的模式。讨论聚焦于调节用于执行给定任务的信息类型的注意系统的作用。

相似文献

1
Summation of activation: evidence from multiple primes that converge and diverge within semantic memory.激活总和:来自语义记忆中收敛和发散的多个启动刺激的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jul;22(4):827-45. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.4.827.
2
Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres: the coarse coding hypothesis revisited.大脑半球中词汇歧义与明确目标的多重启动:再探粗略编码假说
Brain Res. 2007 Jun 11;1153:144-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.046. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
3
Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming.在词汇判断和命名任务中,联想启动效应和语义启动效应在非常短的刺激呈现间隔下就会出现。
Cognition. 1997 Feb;62(2):223-40. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00782-2.
4
Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: the role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.发音任务中的语义启动:预期启动产生的预期的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1990 May;18(3):289-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03213882.
5
Beyond binary judgments: prime validity modulates masked repetition priming in the naming task.超越二元判断:启动有效性调节命名任务中的掩蔽重复启动效应。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Jan;32(1):1-11. doi: 10.3758/bf03195815.
6
Being forward not backward: lexical limits to masked priming.向前而非向后:掩蔽启动效应的词汇限制
Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):673-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
7
Priming summation in the cerebral hemispheres: evidence from semantically convergent and semantically divergent primes.大脑半球中的启动总和:来自语义趋同和语义发散启动的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(7):892-901. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00174-9.
8
Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.词汇判断任务中的语义启动:预期启动产生的期望和回顾性语义匹配的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989 Nov;15(6):1003-19. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.6.1003.
9
Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes.
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Aug;58(6):823-35. doi: 10.3758/bf03205486.
10
Effects of word- and sentence-level contexts upon word recognition.词汇和句子层面的语境对单词识别的影响。
Mem Cognit. 1990 Mar;18(2):153-63. doi: 10.3758/bf03197090.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of spatial and verbal working memory load on semantic relatedness judgements.空间和言语工作记忆负荷对语义相关性判断的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):781-789. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02323-0. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
2
Comparing person and people perception: Multiple group members do not increase stereotype priming.个体和群体知觉的比较:多个群体成员并不会增加刻板印象启动。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Aug;74(8):1418-1431. doi: 10.1177/17470218211012852. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
3
CLAD: A corpus-derived Chinese Lexical Association Database.
CLAD:基于语料库的汉语词汇联想数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Oct;51(5):2310-2336. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01208-2.
4
spreadr: An R package to simulate spreading activation in a network.spreadr:一个用于模拟网络中传播激活的 R 包。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):910-929. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1186-5.
5
A novel co-occurrence-based approach to predict pure associative and semantic priming.一种基于新共现的方法来预测纯粹联想和语义启动。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1488-1493. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1453-6.
6
Semantic integration by pattern priming: experiment and cortical network model.通过模式启动进行语义整合:实验与皮层网络模型
Cogn Neurodyn. 2016 Dec;10(6):513-533. doi: 10.1007/s11571-016-9410-4. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
7
The Temporal Courses of Phonological and Orthographic Encoding in Handwritten Production in Chinese: An ERP Study.汉语手写过程中语音和正字法编码的时间进程:一项ERP研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 24;10:417. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00417. eCollection 2016.
8
Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.与纯粹的联想关系相比,分类和联想关系会增加错误记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jan;44(1):37-49. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0543-1.
9
List blocking and longer retention intervals reveal an influence of gist processing for lexically ambiguous critical lures.列表阻断和更长的保持间隔揭示了主旨加工对词汇歧义关键诱饵的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1193-207. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0533-3.
10
Phonology is not accessed earlier than orthography in Chinese written production: evidence for the orthography autonomy hypothesis.在中文书面表达中,语音学的使用不会早于正字法:正字法自主性假说的证据。
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 17;6:448. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00448. eCollection 2015.