Suppr超能文献

自然环境中的睡眠:一项初步研究。

Sleep in the Natural Environment: A Pilot Study.

机构信息

Hasso Plattner Institute for Digital Health at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10032, USA.

Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 3;20(5):1378. doi: 10.3390/s20051378.

Abstract

Sleep quality has been directly linked to cognitive function, quality of life, and a variety of serious diseases across many clinical domains. Standard methods for assessing sleep involve overnight studies in hospital settings, which are uncomfortable, expensive, not representative of real sleep, and difficult to conduct on a large scale. Recently, numerous commercial digital devices have been developed that record physiological data, such as movement, heart rate, and respiratory rate, which can act as a proxy for sleep quality in lieu of standard electroencephalogram recording equipment. The sleep-related output metrics from these devices include sleep staging and total sleep duration and are derived via proprietary algorithms that utilize a variety of these physiological recordings. Each device company makes different claims of accuracy and measures different features of sleep quality, and it is still unknown how well these devices correlate with one another and perform in a research setting. In this pilot study of 21 participants, we investigated whether sleep metric outputs from self-reported sleep metrics (SRSMs) and four sensors, specifically Fitbit Surge (a smart watch), Withings Aura (a sensor pad that is placed under a mattress), Hexoskin (a smart shirt), and Oura Ring (a smart ring), were related to known cognitive and psychological metrics, including the n-back test and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We analyzed correlation between multiple device-related sleep metrics. Furthermore, we investigated relationships between these sleep metrics and cognitive scores across different timepoints and SRSM through univariate linear regressions. We found that correlations for sleep metrics between the devices across the sleep cycle were almost uniformly low, but still significant ( < 0.05). For cognitive scores, we found the Withings latency was statistically significant for afternoon and evening timepoints at = 0.016 and = 0.013. We did not find any significant associations between SRSMs and PSQI or cognitive scores. Additionally, Oura Ring's total sleep duration and efficiency in relation to the PSQI measure was statistically significant at = 0.004 and = 0.033, respectively. These findings can hopefully be used to guide future sensor-based sleep research.

摘要

睡眠质量与认知功能、生活质量以及许多临床领域的各种严重疾病直接相关。评估睡眠的标准方法涉及在医院环境中进行整夜研究,但这种方法既不舒服、费用高昂,又不能代表真实睡眠,而且难以大规模进行。最近,许多商业数字设备已经开发出来,可以记录生理数据,如运动、心率和呼吸率,这些数据可以替代标准脑电图记录设备来作为睡眠质量的替代指标。这些设备的与睡眠相关的输出指标包括睡眠分期和总睡眠时间,并且是通过利用各种生理记录的专有算法得出的。每个设备公司都有不同的准确性声明,并测量睡眠质量的不同特征,目前尚不清楚这些设备彼此之间的相关性如何,以及在研究环境中的表现如何。在这项针对 21 名参与者的试点研究中,我们调查了自我报告的睡眠指标 (SRSMs) 和四个传感器(即 Fitbit Surge(智能手表)、Withings Aura(放置在床垫下的传感器垫)、Hexoskin(智能衬衫)和 Oura Ring(智能戒指))的睡眠指标输出是否与已知的认知和心理指标相关,包括 n-back 测试和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数 (PSQI)。我们分析了多个设备相关的睡眠指标之间的相关性。此外,我们通过单变量线性回归调查了这些睡眠指标与不同时间点和 SRSM 之间的认知评分之间的关系。我们发现,在整个睡眠周期中,设备之间的睡眠指标相关性几乎普遍较低,但仍具有统计学意义(<0.05)。对于认知评分,我们发现 Withings 潜伏期在下午和晚上的时间点与认知评分显著相关,p 值分别为 0.016 和 0.013。我们没有发现 SRSMs 与 PSQI 或认知评分之间存在任何显著关联。此外,Oura Ring 的总睡眠时间和与 PSQI 测量相关的效率在统计学上显著,p 值分别为 0.004 和 0.033。这些发现有望用于指导未来基于传感器的睡眠研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd84/7085707/489ca223fc1c/sensors-20-01378-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验