Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Mar 5;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01002-x.
The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)-Lipid study found no evidence of a beneficial effect of statin-fibrate combined treatment, compared to statins alone, on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus after 5 years of active treatment. However, a beneficial reduction in major CVD events was shown in a pre-specified sub-group of participants with dyslipidemia. The extended follow-up of this trial provides the opportunity to further investigate possible beneficial effects of fibrates in this group of patients. We aimed to evaluate possible "legacy effects" of fibrate add-on therapy on mortality and major cardiovascular outcomes in patients with dyslipidemia.
The ACCORD-lipid study was a randomized controlled trial of 5518 participants assigned to receive simvastatin plus fenofibrate vs simvastatin plus placebo. After randomized treatment allocation had finished at the end of the trial, all surviving participants were invited to attend an extended follow-up study (ACCORDION) to continue prospective collection of clinical outcomes. We undertook a secondary analysis of trial and post-trial data in patients who had dyslipidemia. The primary outcome was all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and secondary outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure and major coronary heart disease. We used an intention-to-treat approach to analysis to make comparisons between the original randomized treatment groups.
853 participants with dyslipidemia had survived at the end of the trial. Most participants continued to use statins, but few used fibrates in either group during the post-trial period. The incidence rates in the fenofibrate group were lower with respect to all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and major coronary heart disease than those in the placebo group over a post-trial follow-up. Allocation to the combined fibrate-statin treatment arm during the trial period had a beneficial legacy effect on all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94; P = 0.02).
Fibrate treatment during the initial trial period was associated with a legacy benefit of improved survival over a post-trial follow-up. These findings support re-evaluation of fibrates as an add-on strategy to statins in order to reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients with dyslipidemia. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT00000620.
在 2 型糖尿病患者中,ACTION 控制心血管风险糖尿病脂研究(ACCORD-Lipid)发现与他汀类药物单药治疗相比,他汀类药物与贝特类药物联合治疗在 5 年的积极治疗后对心血管结局和死亡率没有益处。然而,在血脂异常的预设亚组参与者中,主要 CVD 事件减少。该试验的延长随访为进一步研究贝特类药物在这组患者中的可能有益作用提供了机会。我们旨在评估贝特类药物添加治疗对血脂异常患者死亡率和主要心血管结局的可能“遗留效应”。
ACCORD-Lipid 研究是一项 5518 名参与者的随机对照试验,被分配接受辛伐他汀加非诺贝特与辛伐他汀加安慰剂治疗。在试验结束时随机分配治疗后,所有幸存的参与者都被邀请参加延长的随访研究(ACCORDION),以继续前瞻性收集临床结局。我们对血脂异常患者进行了试验和试验后数据的二次分析。主要结局是全因和心血管死亡率,次要结局是非致死性心肌梗死、中风、充血性心力衰竭和主要冠心病。我们采用意向治疗分析方法比较了原始随机治疗组之间的差异。
试验结束时,853 名血脂异常患者幸存。大多数参与者继续使用他汀类药物,但在试验后期间,两组中很少使用贝特类药物。与安慰剂组相比,非诺贝特组的全因死亡率、CVD 死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭和主要冠心病的发生率较低。在试验期间,联合使用贝特类药物和他汀类药物治疗组对全因死亡率有有益的遗留效应(调整后的 HR=0.65,95%CI 0.45-0.94;P=0.02)。
在最初的试验期间使用贝特类药物治疗与试验后随访期间的生存改善的遗留益处相关。这些发现支持重新评估贝特类药物作为他汀类药物的附加策略,以降低血脂异常的糖尿病患者的心血管风险。试验注册clinicaltrials.gov,标识符:NCT00000620。