• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于侧卧位对儿童i-gel喉罩和ProSeal喉罩口咽密封压力影响的研究。

A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel and ProSeal LMA in children.

作者信息

Thakur Deepali P, Malde Anila D

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, LTMMC and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;64(2):125-130. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19. Epub 2020 Feb 4.

DOI:10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19
PMID:32139930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7017671/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Supraglottic airways (SGAs) should have good oropharyngeal seal pressures (OSP) for adequate ventilation and prevention of aspiration. Our aim was to study the effect of lateral position on OSP and thereby on ventilatory parameters for i-gel and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) in children.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 86 children of ASA I-II, aged 1 month to 12 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia using i-gel or PLMA and requiring lateral position either for surgery or regional blocks were included. In both supine and lateral position OSP (constant flow method), expired tidal volume, fractional volume loss (%), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO) were noted. Intragroup and intergroup difference in OSP from supine to lateral position was analyzed using paired and unpaired -test respectively.

RESULTS

In lateral position, there was a significant decrease in the OSP (cm HO) in both i-gel (supine: 21.94 ± 5.82, lateral: 15.54 ± 5.37) and PLMA (supine: 17.53 ± 5.05, lateral: 12.76 ± 3.37) groups ( = 0.000). Percentage reduction in OSP from supine to lateral with i-gel (28.14 ± 18.86) and PLMA (24.06 ± 19.75) were comparable ( = 0.339). With both i-gel and PLMA significant increase in fractional volume loss and ETCO were noted in lateral position. I-gel group had higher OSP compared to PLMA in supine ( = 0.001) and lateral position ( = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

In lateral position there was significant reduction in OSP compared to supine position with both i-gel and PLMA.

摘要

背景与目的

声门上气道(SGA)应具备良好的口咽密封压(OSP),以实现充分通气并预防误吸。我们的目的是研究侧卧位对儿童使用i-gel喉罩和ProSeal™喉罩气道(PLMA)时的口咽密封压以及通气参数的影响。

方法

在这项前瞻性观察研究中,纳入了86例年龄在1个月至12岁之间、ASA分级为I-II级、计划在全身麻醉下使用i-gel喉罩或PLMA进行择期手术且因手术或区域阻滞需要侧卧位的儿童。记录仰卧位和侧卧位时的口咽密封压(恒定流量法)、呼出潮气量、容积损失百分比(%)和呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO)。分别使用配对t检验和非配对t检验分析仰卧位到侧卧位时口咽密封压的组内和组间差异。

结果

在侧卧位时,i-gel组(仰卧位:21.94±5.82,侧卧位:15.54±5.37)和PLMA组(仰卧位:17.53±5.05,侧卧位:12.76±3.37)的口咽密封压(cm H₂O)均显著降低(P = 0.000)。i-gel组(28.14±18.86)和PLMA组(24.06±19.75)从仰卧位到侧卧位时口咽密封压的降低百分比具有可比性(P = 0.339)。在侧卧位时,使用i-gel喉罩和PLMA均观察到容积损失百分比和呼气末二氧化碳显著增加。在仰卧位(P = 0.001)和侧卧位(P = 0.009)时,i-gel组的口咽密封压均高于PLMA组。

结论

与仰卧位相比,使用i-gel喉罩和PLMA时,侧卧位的口咽密封压均显著降低。

相似文献

1
A study of effect of lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressure of i-gel and ProSeal LMA in children.一项关于侧卧位对儿童i-gel喉罩和ProSeal喉罩口咽密封压力影响的研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;64(2):125-130. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_635_19. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
2
Effect of Pneumoperitoneum and Lateral Position on Oropharyngeal Seal Pressures of Proseal LMA in Laparoscopic Urological Procedures.气腹和侧卧位对腹腔镜泌尿外科手术中喉罩气道密封压的影响
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Feb;11(2):UC05-UC09. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/22168.9422. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.在接受择期手术的自主呼吸儿童中,2号i-gel喉上气道与LMA-ProSeal™和LMA-Classic™的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):355-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
4
Influence of lateral position and pneumoperitoneum on oropharyngeal leak pressure with two types of laryngeal mask airways.两种喉罩气道下侧卧位和气腹对口咽漏气压的影响
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Oct;61(9):1114-1121. doi: 10.1111/aas.12943. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
5
Comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the I-Gel™ in the different head-and-neck positions in anaesthetised paralysed children: A randomised controlled trial.在麻醉状态下瘫痪儿童的不同头颈部位置,比较ProSeal喉罩气道与I-Gel™:一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;62(2):103-108. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_594_17.
6
PLMA vs. I-gel: A Comparative Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.喉罩气道与喉罩型喉管:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中呼吸力学的比较评估
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;26(4):451-7.
7
Comparison of Baska Mask Versus Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Elective Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.全身麻醉下择期手术中Baska面罩与Proseal喉罩气道的比较:一项随机临床试验
Cureus. 2023 Apr 10;15(4):e37366. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37366. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
[An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].[ProSeal喉罩气道与标准喉罩气道用于正压通气的自动控制比较]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2007 Feb;19(2):81-5.
9
Comparison of laryngeal tube suction II and proseal LMA™ in pediatric patients, undergoing elective surgery.喉罩二代与Proseal LMA™在择期手术小儿患者中的比较。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Oct-Dec;11(4):432-436. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_418_17.
10
Comparing leak pressure of LMA ProSeal™ versus i-gel at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial.比较LMA ProSeal™与i-gel在头部旋转时的漏气压力:一项随机对照试验。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):66-76. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02648-3. Epub 2023 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of view-adjustable video laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation for airway management during anaesthesia for arthroscopic surgery: a randomized trial.在关节镜手术麻醉期间使用视野可调视频喉罩与气管插管进行气道管理的随机试验
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2519683. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2519683. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Bronchial blocker through Proseal LMA - A useful approach for paediatric lung isolation.通过喉罩气道封堵器进行支气管封堵——小儿肺隔离的一种有效方法。
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Jul;66(7):537-538. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_63_22. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Effect of diffusion of anaesthetic gases on fibre-optic view change of laryngeal mask airway and post-operative laryngo-pharyngeal morbidity in children - A randomised controlled trial.麻醉气体扩散对儿童喉罩气道光纤视野变化及术后喉咽发病率的影响——一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;65(9):644-649. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_432_21. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
4
Comparative evaluation of Air-Q blocker and Proseal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia: A randomised controlled trial.全麻下行择期手术患者中Air-Q封堵器与喉罩气道的比较评估:一项随机对照试验
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(Suppl 1):S20-S26. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1254_20. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
5
Influence of head and neck positions on oropharyngeal seal pressure with Baska mask versus I-gel™; A randomised clinical study.使用巴斯卡面罩与I-gel™面罩时头颈部位置对口咽密封压力的影响:一项随机临床研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;64(8):675-680. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_185_20. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
6
Supraglottic airway devices: Placement and pharyngeal seal matters!声门上气道装置:放置与咽部密封很重要!
Indian J Anaesth. 2020 Aug;64(8):649-652. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_938_20. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of I-gel™ airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children.在麻醉瘫痪儿童中评估不同头颈部位置下的I-gel™气道。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Dec;25(12):1248-53. doi: 10.1111/pan.12748. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
2
Influence of Head and Neck Position on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure and Cuff Position with the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway and the I-Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial.头颈部位置对使用ProSeal喉罩气道和I-Gel时口咽漏气压及套囊位置的影响:一项随机临床试验
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2015;2015:705869. doi: 10.1155/2015/705869. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
3
A performance comparison of the paediatric i-gel with other supraglottic airway devices.小儿 i-gel 与其他声门上气道装置的性能比较。
Anaesthesia. 2015 Jan;70(1):84-92. doi: 10.1111/anae.12830. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
4
Evaluation of i-gel(™) airway in children: a meta-analysis.儿童使用i-gel(™)气道的评估:一项荟萃分析。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Oct;24(10):1072-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12483. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
5
Comparison of i-gel supraglottic airway and LMA-ProSeal™ in pediatric patients under controlled ventilation.在控制通气下小儿患者中使用i-gel喉上气道与LMA-ProSeal™的比较。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Apr;30(2):195-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.130013.
6
Comparison of Size 2.5 i-gel™ with Proseal LMA™ in Anaesthetised, Paralyzed Children Undergoing Elective Surgery.在接受择期手术的麻醉、瘫痪儿童中比较2.5号i-gel™喉罩与Proseal LMA™喉罩的效果
N Am J Med Sci. 2012 Oct;4(10):453-7. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.101983.
7
A randomized comparison of the i-gel and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in pediatric patients: performance and fiberoptic findings.喉罩 i-gel 与 ProSeal 喉罩在小儿患者中应用的随机比较:性能和纤维光学观察结果。
J Anesth. 2013 Feb;27(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1477-4. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
8
LMA ProSeal(TM) vs. i-Gel(TM) in ventilated children: a randomised, crossover study using the size 2 mask.LMA ProSeal(TM)与 i-Gel(TM)在通气儿童中的比较:使用 2 号面罩的随机交叉研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Nov;56(10):1321-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02765.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
9
A clinical evaluation of the I-gel ™ supraglottic airway device in children.I-gel™ 声门上气道装置在儿童中的临床评估
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):765-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03893.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
10
Comparison of size 2 i-gel supraglottic airway with LMA-ProSeal™ and LMA-Classic™ in spontaneously breathing children undergoing elective surgery.在接受择期手术的自主呼吸儿童中,2号i-gel喉上气道与LMA-ProSeal™和LMA-Classic™的比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Apr;22(4):355-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.03757.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.