Paediatric Orthopaedics, Hôpital D'enfants de La Timone, Aix Marseille University, 264 rue Saint Pierre, 13005, Marseille, France.
Gait Analysis Platform, Timone, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1972-1980. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), spinal deformity can be seen in the thoracic or in the lumbar area. Although differences according to curve location are well described on standard radiographs, dynamic consequences of such difference remain unclear. Our objective was to explore the differences in dynamic spinal balance according to curve location in AIS patients using gait analysis METHODS: We prospectively included 22 females with AIS planned for surgical correction (16.3 years old, 81% Risser ≥ 4). Patients were divided into two matched cohorts, according to major curve location [right thoracic (Lenke 1) or left lumbar (Lenke 5)]. Gait analysis was performed the day before surgery. Global balance was analyzed as the primary outcome. Local curves parameters (dynamic Cobb angles) were defined as the secondary outcome.
In coronal plane, Lenke 5 patients had a left trunk shift, whereas trunk was shifted to the right in Lenke 1 patients (- 20.7 vs 6.3, p = 0.001). In the sagittal plane, the main difference between the two groups was T12 position that remained over the pelvis during gait in Lenke 5 patients, whereas it was anterior to the pelvis in Lenke 1 patients. In the transversal plane, Lenke 5 and Lenke 1 patients presented the same gait abnormalities, with a global trunk rotation to the left (- 4.8 vs - 7.6, p = 0,165).
This is the first study to provide the results of a direct comparison between Lenke 1 and Lenke 5 patients during gait. Curve location influenced coronal and sagittal balance, but abnormalities of transversal trunk motion were the same, wherever the curve was located. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)中,脊柱畸形可发生在胸椎或腰椎区域。虽然根据曲线位置在标准 X 光片上的差异已有很好的描述,但这种差异的动态后果尚不清楚。我们的目的是使用步态分析来探讨 AIS 患者脊柱侧凸位置不同对动态脊柱平衡的影响。
我们前瞻性纳入了 22 名计划接受手术矫正的 AIS 女性患者(16.3 岁,81% Risser≥4)。根据主要曲线位置(右胸弯[Lenke 1 型]或左腰弯[Lenke 5 型]),将患者分为两组。在手术前一天进行步态分析。全局平衡作为主要结果进行分析。局部曲线参数(动态 Cobb 角)作为次要结果进行定义。
在冠状面,Lenke 5 型患者的躯干向左偏移,而 Lenke 1 型患者的躯干向右侧偏移(-20.7 对 6.3,p=0.001)。在矢状面,两组之间的主要区别是 T12 位置,Lenke 5 型患者在行走过程中 T12 位于骨盆上方,而 Lenke 1 型患者 T12 位于骨盆前方。在横断面,Lenke 5 型和 Lenke 1 型患者的步态异常相同,表现为躯干向左侧整体旋转(-4.8 对-7.6,p=0.165)。
这是第一项对行走过程中 Lenke 1 型和 Lenke 5 型患者进行直接比较的研究。曲线位置影响冠状面和矢状面平衡,但无论曲线位于何处,横向躯干运动的异常是相同的。这些幻灯片可在电子补充材料中获取。