• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态支具与单纯标准治疗在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者中的疗效和成本效益比较:一项多中心、两臂、平行组随机对照试验方案,随访 12 个月。

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Department of Orthopedics and Research School CAPHRI, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e054315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054315.

DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054315
PMID:35613823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9125700/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with osteoporosis may suffer from a fracture after minimal trauma. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are among the most common fractures, often leading to substantial pain. There is a need for evidence-based conservative treatment to aid in the management of OVCFs. The objective of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing in addition to standard care for improving quality of life (QoL) in patients suffering from an OVCF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Ninety-eight postmenopausal women from two academic and four community hospitals with a recent symptomatic thoracolumbar OVCF will be randomised into either the standard care or dynamic bracing group. In the dynamic bracing group, the Spinova Osteo orthosis will be used in addition to standard care. Standard care comprises pain control with analgesics, physical therapy and osteoporosis medication. The primary outcome parameter is QoL 1 year after inclusion, as measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41). Secondary outcome parameters are pain, pain medication used, functional disability, sagittal spinal alignment, recurrence rate of OVCFs and physical activity in daily life. A trial-based economic evaluation consisting of both cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis will be performed based on empirical data obtained in the RCT. A process evaluation will assess the feasibility of dynamic bracing. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted by the Medical Ethics Committee, University Hospital Maastricht and Maastricht University (METC azM/UM) (NL74552.068.20/METC 20-055). Patients will be included only after verification of eligibility and obtaining written informed consent. Results will be disseminated via the Dutch National Osteoporosis Patient Society and via publications and conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL8746.

摘要

简介

骨质疏松症患者在轻微创伤后可能会发生骨折。骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)是最常见的骨折之一,常导致严重疼痛。需要有循证的保守治疗方法来帮助管理 OVCFs。本随机对照试验(RCT)的目的是评估动态支具在标准治疗基础上对改善 OVCF 患者生活质量(QoL)的有效性和成本效益。

方法和分析

98 名来自两家学术医院和四家社区医院的近期有症状胸腰椎 OVCF 的绝经后妇女将被随机分为标准治疗组或动态支具组。在动态支具组中,除标准治疗外,还将使用 Spinova Osteo 矫形器。标准治疗包括疼痛控制(镇痛药)、物理治疗和骨质疏松症药物治疗。主要结局参数是纳入后 1 年的 QoL,通过欧洲骨质疏松症基金会生活质量问卷(QUALEFFO-41)进行评估。次要结局参数是疼痛、使用的止痛药物、功能障碍、矢状位脊柱排列、OVCF 复发率和日常生活中的体力活动。根据 RCT 中获得的经验数据,将进行基于试验的经济评估,包括成本效益分析和成本效用分析。流程评估将评估动态支具的可行性。所有结局将在基线、6 周、3 个月、6 个月、9 个月和 12 个月时进行评估。

伦理和传播

Maastricht 大学医院和 Maastricht 大学医学伦理委员会(METC azM/UM)(NL74552.068.20/METC 20-055)已批准伦理。只有在确认符合条件并获得书面知情同意后,才能纳入患者。结果将通过荷兰国家骨质疏松症患者协会以及出版物和会议进行传播。

试验注册号

NL8746。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dynamic bracing versus standard care alone in patients suffering from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: protocol for a multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with 12 months of follow-up.动态支具与单纯标准治疗在骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者中的疗效和成本效益比较:一项多中心、两臂、平行组随机对照试验方案,随访 12 个月。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e054315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054315.
2
Effect of a semirigid thoracolumbar orthosis on gait and sagittal alignment in patients with an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.半刚性胸腰椎支具对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者步态和矢状面平衡的影响。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Apr 11;14:671-680. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S199853. eCollection 2019.
3
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30(4):CD006349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006349.pub2.
4
Exercise or manual physiotherapy compared with a single session of physiotherapy for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: three-arm PROVE RCT.运动或手法物理治疗与单次物理治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折的比较:三臂 PROVE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(44):1-318. doi: 10.3310/hta23440.
5
Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs): conservative treatment versus balloon kyphoplasty.骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)患者临床结局的对比分析:保守治疗与球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术。
Spine J. 2012 Nov;12(11):998-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.08.024. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
6
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Conservative Treatment in Aged Patients With Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.老年急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗的前瞻性随机对照临床研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41(8):653-60. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001298.
7
Balloon kyphoplasty: an evidence-based analysis.球囊椎体后凸成形术:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(12):1-45. Epub 2004 Dec 1.
8
Dynamic corset versus three-point brace in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective, comparative study.动态束腹带与三点式支具治疗胸腰椎骨质疏松性压缩骨折的前瞻性对比研究
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Jun;29(3):443-449. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0602-x. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
9
Functional Outcomes and New Vertebral Fractures in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Conservative Treatment of Acute Symptomatic Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures.经皮椎体成形术与保守治疗对急性症状性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的功能结果和新发椎体骨折的影响。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e346-e352. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.153. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: an evidence-based analysis.经皮椎体成形术治疗疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(19):1-45. Epub 2010 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in management of symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a nationwide multidisciplinary survey.症状性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折管理的差异:全国多学科调查。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Oct 23;19(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01454-8.
2
Spinal orthoses in osteoporotic vertebral fractures of the elderly.脊柱矫形器在老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折中的应用
J Spine Surg. 2023 Sep 22;9(3):224-228. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-76. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
3
Similarities and Differences in the Management of Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures and Those with Rebound-Associated Vertebral Fractures Following Discontinuation of Denosumab.

本文引用的文献

1
Does spinal sagittal imbalance lead to future vertebral compression fractures in osteoporosis patients?脊柱矢状面失衡是否会导致骨质疏松症患者未来发生椎体压缩性骨折?
Spine J. 2021 Aug;21(8):1362-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
[Osteoporosis and increased risk of fractures].[骨质疏松症与骨折风险增加]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2020 Aug 17;164:D4852.
3
Curve location influences spinal balance in coronal and sagittal planes but not transversal trunk motion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective observational study.
骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者与停用地诺单抗后出现反弹相关椎体骨折患者的管理异同
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 10;12(18):5874. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185874.
4
Bioactive mineralized small intestinal submucosa acellular matrix/PMMA bone cement for vertebral bone regeneration.用于椎体骨再生的生物活性矿化小肠黏膜下层脱细胞基质/聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥
Regen Biomater. 2023 May 11;10:rbad040. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbad040. eCollection 2023.
曲线位置影响冠状面和矢状面的脊柱平衡,但在特发性脊柱侧凸的青少年中不影响横向躯干运动:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Aug;29(8):1972-1980. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06361-3. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
4
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A History of Procedure, Technology, Culture, Specialty, and Economics.经皮椎体成形术:一种手术、技术、文化、专业和经济学的历史。
Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2019 Nov;29(4):481-494. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2019.07.011.
5
Exercise or manual physiotherapy compared with a single session of physiotherapy for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: three-arm PROVE RCT.运动或手法物理治疗与单次物理治疗骨质疏松性椎体骨折的比较:三臂 PROVE RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(44):1-318. doi: 10.3310/hta23440.
6
Effect of a semirigid thoracolumbar orthosis on gait and sagittal alignment in patients with an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.半刚性胸腰椎支具对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者步态和矢状面平衡的影响。
Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Apr 11;14:671-680. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S199853. eCollection 2019.
7
Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.哪种方法是治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的最佳方法:球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术、经皮椎体成形术还是非手术治疗?贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Feb;30(2):287-298. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4804-2. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
8
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.欧洲绝经后妇女骨质疏松症的诊断和管理指南。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jan;30(1):3-44. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
Vertebroplasty versus sham procedure for painful acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VERTOS IV): randomised sham controlled clinical trial.椎体成形术与假手术治疗疼痛性急性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(VERTOS IV):随机假手术对照临床试验。
BMJ. 2018 May 9;361:k1551. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1551.
10
Appropriateness criteria for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折治疗的适宜性标准。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):793-804. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4348-x. Epub 2017 Dec 19.