Petrović Nataša, Moyà-Alcover Gabriel, Varona Javier, Jaume-I-Capó Antoni
University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Universitat de les Illes Balears, Spain.
Health Informatics J. 2020 Dec;26(4):2446-2469. doi: 10.1177/1460458220907435. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Computer-assisted algorithms for the analysis of medical images require human interactions to achieve satisfying results. Human-based computation and crowdsourcing offer a solution to this problem. We performed a systematic literature review of studies on crowdsourcing human-based computation for medical image analysis based on the guidelines proposed by Kitchenham and Charters. We identified 43 studies relevant to the objective of this research. We determined three primary purposes and problems that crowdsourcing human-based computation systems can solve. We found that the users provided five information types. We compared systems that use pre-, post-evaluation and quality control methods to select and filter the user inputs. We analyzed the metrics used for the evaluation of the crowdsourcing human-based computation system performance. Finally, we identified the most popular crowdsourcing human-based computation platforms with their advantages and disadvantages.Crowdsourcing human-based computation systems can successfully solve medical image analysis problems. However, the application of crowdsourcing human-based computation systems in this research area is still limited and more studies should be conducted to obtain generalizable results. We provided guidelines to practitioners and researchers based on the results obtained in this research.
用于医学图像分析的计算机辅助算法需要人工交互才能获得令人满意的结果。基于人工的计算和众包为这一问题提供了解决方案。我们根据Kitchenham和Charters提出的指南,对基于众包的人工计算用于医学图像分析的研究进行了系统的文献综述。我们确定了43项与本研究目标相关的研究。我们确定了众包人工计算系统可以解决的三个主要目的和问题。我们发现用户提供了五种信息类型。我们比较了使用预评估、后评估和质量控制方法来选择和过滤用户输入的系统。我们分析了用于评估众包人工计算系统性能的指标。最后,我们确定了最受欢迎的众包人工计算平台及其优缺点。众包人工计算系统可以成功解决医学图像分析问题。然而,众包人工计算系统在这一研究领域的应用仍然有限,应该进行更多的研究以获得可推广的结果。我们根据本研究获得的结果为从业者和研究人员提供了指导方针。