Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Biomech. 2020 Mar 26;102:109671. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109671. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 3D L5/S1 moment estimates from an ambulatory measurement system consisting of a wearable inertial motion capture system (IMC) and instrumented force shoes (FSs), during manual lifting. Reference L5/S1 moments were calculated using an inverse dynamics bottom-up laboratory model (LAB), based on data from a measurement system comprising optical motion capture (OMC) and force plates (FPs). System performance of (1) a bottom-up ambulatory model (AMB) using lower-body kinematic IMC and FS data, and (2) a top-down ambulatory model (AMB) using upper-body kinematic IMC data and hand forces (HFs) were compared. HFs were estimated using full-body kinematic IMC data and FS forces. Eight males and eight females lifted a 10-kg box from different initial vertical/horizontal positions using either a free or an asymmetric lifting style. As a measure of system performance, root-mean-square (RMS) errors were calculated between the reference (LAB) and ambulatory (AMB &AMB) moments. The results showed two times smaller errors for the AMB (averaged RMS errors < 20 Nm or 10% of peak extension moment) than for the AMB (average RMS errors < 40 Nm or 20% of peak extension moment). In conclusion, for ambulatory L5/S1 moment assessment with an IMC + FS system, using a top-down inverse dynamics approach with estimated hand forces is to be preferred over a bottom-up approach.
本研究旨在评估由可穿戴惯性运动捕捉系统(IMC)和测力鞋(FS)组成的动态测量系统在手动举升过程中对 3D L5/S1 力矩估计的准确性。基于包含光学运动捕捉(OMC)和力板(FP)的测量系统数据,使用基于反向动力学的实验室模型(LAB)计算出 L5/S1 力矩的参考值。比较了以下两种基于 IMC 和 FS 数据的下半身运动学的基于下向上的动态模型(AMB)和基于 IMC 数据和手部力(HFs)的上向下的动态模型(AMB)的系统性能:(1)使用下半身运动学的 IMC 和 FS 数据的基于下向上的动态模型(AMB),(2)使用上半身运动学的 IMC 数据和手部力(HFs)的上向下的动态模型(AMB)。HFs 是使用完整的 IMC 数据和 FS 力来估算的。8 名男性和 8 名女性从不同的初始垂直/水平位置用自由或不对称的举升方式提起一个 10 公斤的箱子。作为系统性能的衡量标准,计算了参考(LAB)和动态(AMB 和 AMB)力矩之间的均方根(RMS)误差。结果表明,AMB 的误差小两倍(平均 RMS 误差 < 20 Nm 或峰值伸展力矩的 10%),AMB 的误差小四倍(平均 RMS 误差 < 40 Nm 或峰值伸展力矩的 20%)。总之,对于使用 IMC+FS 系统进行动态 L5/S1 力矩评估,使用基于估计手部力的自上而下的反向动力学方法优于基于下向上的方法。