• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SOX-PTS 评分在近端深静脉血栓形成患者前瞻性多中心试验中的外部验证。

External validation of the SOX-PTS score in a prospective multicenter trial of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.

机构信息

Thrombosis and Hemostasis Unit, Hematology Institute, Soroka University Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1381-1389. doi: 10.1111/jth.14791. Epub 2020 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1111/jth.14791
PMID:32145144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7545582/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using data from the SOX Trial, we recently developed a clinical prediction model for occurrence of the postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) after proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT), termed the SOX-PTS score. The score includes anatomical extent of DVT; body mass index; and baseline Villalta score.

OBJECTIVE

To externally validate the SOX-PTS score.

METHODS

Logistic regression analysis of data from the ATTRACT Trial that evaluated pharmacomechanical catheter directed thrombolysis in patients with proximal DVT. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PTS (defined as Villalta score ≥ 5) from 6 to 24 months after DVT. Secondary outcomes included moderate-severe PTS (Villalta scale ≥ 10) and severe PTS (Villalta scale ≥ 14). Predictive performance was assessed by discrimination and calibration. An updated score was evaluated in an exploratory analysis.

RESULTS

Six hundred and ninety-one ATTRACT patients were included, of whom 328 (47%) developed PTS. The c-statistic was 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.67 for PTS. The model's performance appeared to be better for the outcomes moderate to severe PTS and severe PTS (c-statistic 0.67; 95% CI 0.62-0.72 for moderate-severe PTS and 0.70; 0.64-0.77 for severe PTS). An updated model with age as an additional variable performed similarly to the original model.

CONCLUSION

We externally validated the SOX-PTS score for estimating the risk of developing PTS, moderate to severe PTS, and severe PTS, in patients with proximal DVT. The score may be useful to predict PTS at the time of DVT diagnosis. Further external validation in different patient cohorts is required.

摘要

背景

我们最近利用 SOX 试验的数据,开发了一种预测近端深静脉血栓(DVT)后血栓后综合征(PTS)发生的临床预测模型,称为 SOX-PTS 评分。该评分包括 DVT 的解剖范围、体重指数和基线 Villalta 评分。

目的

外部验证 SOX-PTS 评分。

方法

对评估近端 DVT 患者药物机械导管溶栓的 ATTRACT 试验数据进行逻辑回归分析。主要结局是 DVT 后 6-24 个月 PTS 的发生(定义为 Villalta 评分≥5)。次要结局包括中重度 PTS(Villalta 量表≥10)和重度 PTS(Villalta 量表≥14)。预测性能通过区分度和校准度进行评估。在探索性分析中评估了更新的评分。

结果

共纳入 691 例 ATTRACT 患者,其中 328 例(47%)发生 PTS。C 统计量为 0.63;95%置信区间(CI)为 PTS 的 0.59-0.67。该模型的性能对于中重度 PTS 和重度 PTS 的结果似乎更好(中重度 PTS 的 C 统计量为 0.67;95%CI 为 0.62-0.72,重度 PTS 的为 0.70;0.64-0.77)。一个包含年龄作为附加变量的更新模型与原始模型表现相似。

结论

我们对 SOX-PTS 评分进行了外部验证,以评估近端 DVT 患者发生 PTS、中重度 PTS 和重度 PTS 的风险。该评分可能有助于在 DVT 诊断时预测 PTS。需要在不同的患者队列中进行进一步的外部验证。

相似文献

1
External validation of the SOX-PTS score in a prospective multicenter trial of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.SOX-PTS 评分在近端深静脉血栓形成患者前瞻性多中心试验中的外部验证。
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jun;18(6):1381-1389. doi: 10.1111/jth.14791. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
2
Development of a clinical prediction model for the postthrombotic syndrome in a prospective cohort of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.前瞻性近端深静脉血栓形成患者队列中血栓后综合征的临床预测模型的建立。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Feb;16(2):262-270. doi: 10.1111/jth.13909. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
3
Predictors of Clinical Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Trial.经导管药物溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成的临床转归预测因素:多中心随机试验分析。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1161-1170.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.05.030. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
4
Comparison of anticoagulation vs mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.比较抗凝治疗与机械取栓治疗髂股静脉深静脉血栓。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Jul;12(4):101825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101825. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis in Acute Femoral-Popliteal Deep Vein Thrombosis: Analysis from a Stratified Randomized Trial.药物机械导管溶栓治疗急性股腘静脉血栓形成:分层随机试验分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2019 Apr;119(4):633-644. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677795. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
Derivation and Validation of a Prediction Model for Risk Stratification of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome in Elderly Patients with a First Deep Vein Thrombosis.老年首发深静脉血栓后血栓后综合征风险分层预测模型的建立与验证。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Aug;118(8):1419-1427. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661392. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
7
Development and validation of a clinical prediction model for post thrombotic syndrome following anticoagulant therapy for acute deep venous thrombosis.开发和验证抗凝治疗急性深静脉血栓后血栓后综合征的临床预测模型。
Thromb Res. 2022 Jun;214:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
8
Comparison of Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis: Measures of Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life.比较药物机械性导管溶栓与导管溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成:长期临床结局和生活质量的衡量标准。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
9
Performance and Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Clinical Models to Predict Occurrence of Postthrombotic Syndrome: A Validation Study.三种临床模型预测血栓后综合征发生的性能和头对头比较:一项验证研究。
Thromb Haemost. 2023 Jul;123(7):692-699. doi: 10.1055/a-2039-3388. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
10
Correlation between Post-Procedure Residual Thrombus and Clinical Outcome in Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients Receiving Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis in a Multicenter Randomized Trial.多中心随机试验中接受药物机械溶栓治疗的深静脉血栓形成患者术后残余血栓与临床结局的相关性
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Oct;31(10):1517-1528.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.010. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Untangling profiles of post-thrombotic syndrome using unsupervised machine learning.使用无监督机器学习解析血栓形成后综合征的特征
Blood Adv. 2025 Mar 14. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015829.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of anticoagulation, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis treatments for acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.急性下肢深静脉血栓形成抗凝、经皮机械血栓切除术和导管定向溶栓治疗的成本效益分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39872. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039872.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models for post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with deep vein thrombosis.一项关于深静脉血栓形成患者血栓后综合征风险预测模型的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 10;9(11):e22226. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22226. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Incidence and predictors of post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with proximal DVT in a real-world setting: findings from the GARFIELD-VTE registry.真实世界环境中近端深静脉血栓形成患者发生血栓后综合征的发生率和预测因素:来自 GARFIELD-VTE 登记处的研究结果。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Feb;57(2):312-321. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02895-7. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
A systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of early prediction of post-thrombotic syndrome.血栓形成后综合征早期预测的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 24;10:1250480. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1250480. eCollection 2023.
6
The Post-thrombotic Syndrome-Prevention and Treatment: VAS-European Independent Foundation in Angiology/Vascular Medicine Position Paper.血栓形成后综合征的预防与治疗:VAS - 欧洲血管病学/血管医学独立基金会立场文件
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 24;9:762443. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.762443. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Derivation and Validation of a Prediction Model for Risk Stratification of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome in Elderly Patients with a First Deep Vein Thrombosis.老年首发深静脉血栓后血栓后综合征风险分层预测模型的建立与验证。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Aug;118(8):1419-1427. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1661392. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Development and Validation of a Practical Two-Step Prediction Model and Clinical Risk Score for Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.发展和验证一种实用的两步预测模型和临床风险评分用于血栓后综合征。
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jul;118(7):1242-1249. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655743. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
3
How I treat the postthrombotic syndrome.如何治疗血栓后综合征。
Blood. 2018 May 17;131(20):2215-2222. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-01-785956. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
4
Pharmacomechanical Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Deep-Vein Thrombosis.药物机械性导管定向溶栓治疗深静脉血栓形成
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 7;377(23):2240-2252. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615066.
5
Development of a clinical prediction model for the postthrombotic syndrome in a prospective cohort of patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis.前瞻性近端深静脉血栓形成患者队列中血栓后综合征的临床预测模型的建立。
J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Feb;16(2):262-270. doi: 10.1111/jth.13909. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
6
Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.抗栓治疗 VTE 疾病:CHEST 指南和专家小组报告。
Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):315-352. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2015.11.026. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis with use of endovascular thrombus removal.使用血管内血栓清除术治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成的质量改进指南
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Sep;25(9):1317-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
8
Diagnostic and prognostic prediction models.诊断和预后预测模型。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jun;11 Suppl 1:129-41. doi: 10.1111/jth.12262.
9
Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis.急性下肢深静脉血栓形成后血栓形成后综合征的决定因素及病程
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 18;149(10):698-707. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-10-200811180-00004.
10
Comparison of the Villalta and Ginsberg clinical scales to diagnose the post-thrombotic syndrome: correlation with patient-reported disease burden and venous valvular reflux.Villalta和Ginsberg临床量表在诊断血栓后综合征中的比较:与患者报告的疾病负担和静脉瓣膜反流的相关性
J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Apr;4(4):907-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01824.x.