Suppr超能文献

前列腺高剂量率近距离治疗作为低危和中危前列腺癌的单一疗法:单次 19 Gy 或两次 13.5 Gy 分割剂量的随机 II 期临床试验的疗效结果。

Prostate high dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy for low and intermediate risk prostate cancer: Efficacy results from a randomized phase II clinical trial of one fraction of 19 Gy or two fractions of 13.5 Gy.

机构信息

Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.

Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy as monotherapy is a treatment option for localized prostate cancer, but optimal dose and fractionation is unknown. We report efficacy results of a randomized phase II trial of HDR monotherapy delivered as either one or two fractions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had low or intermediate risk prostate cancer, prostate volume <60 cc, and no androgen deprivation use. 170 patients were randomized to receive HDR as either a single fraction of 19 Gy or as two fractions of 13.5 Gy one week apart. Median age was 65 years, median PSA was 6.33 ng/ml, and Grade Group 1, 2 and 3 was present in 28%, 60%, and 12%, respectively. There was no difference in baseline factors between arms and 19%, 51% and 30% had low risk, favourable intermediate and unfavourable intermediate risk disease, respectively. The Phoenix definition was used to define biochemical failure, all local failures were confirmed by biopsy and toxicity was assessed using CTCAE v.4.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 60 months. PSA decreased more quickly in the 2-fraction arm (p = 0.009). Median PSA at 5-years was 0.65 ng/ml in the single fraction and 0.16 ng/ml in the 2-fraction arm. The 5-year biochemical disease-free survival and cumulative incidence of local failure was 73.5% and 29% in the single fraction arm and 95% (p = 0.001) and 3% (p < 0.001) in the 2-fraction arm, respectively. Recurrence was not associated with initial stage, grade group, or risk group. Grade 2 late rectal toxicity occurred in 1% while the incidence of grade 2 and 3 urinary toxicity was 45% and 1%, respectively, with no difference between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR monotherapy delivered as two fraction of 13.5 Gy is well tolerated with a high cancer control rate at 5 years. Single fraction monotherapy is inferior and should not be used.

摘要

背景与目的

高剂量率(HDR)近距离治疗作为单一疗法是局限性前列腺癌的一种治疗选择,但最佳剂量和分割方式尚不清楚。我们报告了一项 HDR 单一疗法的随机 2 期试验的疗效结果,该试验以单次或两次分割方式进行。

材料与方法

符合条件的患者患有低危或中危前列腺癌,前列腺体积<60 cc,且未使用雄激素剥夺治疗。170 名患者被随机分为接受单次 19 Gy 或两次 13.5 Gy 分割,间隔一周。中位年龄为 65 岁,中位 PSA 为 6.33ng/ml,Gleason 分组 1、2 和 3 的比例分别为 28%、60%和 12%。两组间基线因素无差异,低危、中危有利和中危不利疾病的比例分别为 19%、51%和 30%。采用 Phoenix 定义来定义生化失败,所有局部失败均通过活检证实,毒性使用 CTCAE v.4 进行评估。

结果

中位随访时间为 60 个月。两次分割组的 PSA 下降更快(p=0.009)。单次分割组和两次分割组的 5 年 PSA 中位数分别为 0.65ng/ml 和 0.16ng/ml。单次分割组的 5 年生化无病生存率和局部失败累积发生率分别为 73.5%和 29%,而两次分割组分别为 95%(p=0.001)和 3%(p<0.001)。复发与初始分期、Gleason 分组或危险分组无关。1%的患者出现 2 级晚期直肠毒性,2 级和 3 级尿毒性的发生率分别为 45%和 1%,两组间无差异。

结论

以两次 13.5 Gy 分割方式给予 HDR 单一疗法耐受性良好,5 年时癌症控制率高。单次分割的单一疗法效果较差,不应使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验