• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗中单孔腹腔镜回肠造口术的安全性和有效性

Safety and Efficacy of Single-Port Laparoscopic Ileostomy in Palliative Settings.

作者信息

Kang Seng-Muk, Cho Jung Rae, Oh Heung-Kwon, Lee Eun-Ju, Kim Min Hyun, Kim Duck-Woo, Kang Sung-Bum

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;36(1):17-21. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.04.25. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

DOI:10.3393/ac.2019.04.25
PMID:32146784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7069680/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Single-port laparoscopic techniques can be optimized with confined incisions. This approach has an intraoperative advantage of excellent visualization of the correct intestinal segment for exteriorization, along with direct visual control of the extraction to avoid twisting. However, only a few studies have verified the efficacy of the technique. Thus, this study assessed the results of single-port laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion, specifically focusing on feasibility, safety, and efficacy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single-incision enterostomy performed by a single surgeon were included. Data on demographics, indications for and chosen procedure, and operation results were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Between April 2015 and January 2018, a total of 13 patients (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 57.7 years (range, 41-83 years) underwent single-port ileostomy creation. The most common reason for diversion was palliative ileostomy for colon obstruction or fistula from peritoneal malignancy (n = 12), followed by colonic fistula with necrotizing pancreatitis (n = 1). There were no cases of conversion to open or multiport laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 54 minutes (range, 37-118 minutes), and the median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range, 2-211 days). A postoperative complication, aspiration pneumonia, was documented in 1 patient and treated conservatively. The mean duration of bowel movement was 0.7 days (range, 0-4 days). All stomas had good function, and there was no 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Single-port laparoscopic ileostomy in patients with a palliative setting could be a safe and feasible option for fecal diversion.

摘要

目的

单孔腹腔镜技术可通过有限的切口进行优化。这种方法在术中具有优势,能够清晰地看到用于外置的正确肠段,同时在提取过程中可直接进行视觉控制以避免扭转。然而,仅有少数研究证实了该技术的有效性。因此,本研究评估了单孔腹腔镜造口术用于粪便转流的结果,特别关注其可行性、安全性和有效性。

方法

纳入由单一外科医生进行单切口肠造口术的患者。回顾性收集并分析患者的人口统计学数据、手术指征及所选手术方式、手术结果。

结果

2015年4月至2018年1月,共有13例患者(8例男性,5例女性)接受了单孔回肠造口术,平均年龄为57.7岁(范围41 - 83岁)。转流的最常见原因是因结肠梗阻或腹膜恶性肿瘤所致瘘管而行姑息性回肠造口术(n = 12),其次是结肠瘘合并坏死性胰腺炎(n = 1)。没有转为开放手术或多孔腹腔镜手术的病例。平均手术时间为54分钟(范围37 - 118分钟),中位住院时间为8天(范围2 - 211天)。1例患者出现术后并发症——吸入性肺炎,经保守治疗。平均排便时间为0.7天(范围0 - 4天)。所有造口功能良好,无30天死亡率。

结论

对于姑息性患者,单孔腹腔镜回肠造口术可能是粪便转流的一种安全可行的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea2/7069680/80c6ec6e1e04/ac-2019-04-25f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea2/7069680/80c6ec6e1e04/ac-2019-04-25f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ea2/7069680/80c6ec6e1e04/ac-2019-04-25f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Single-Port Laparoscopic Ileostomy in Palliative Settings.姑息治疗中单孔腹腔镜回肠造口术的安全性和有效性
Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;36(1):17-21. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.04.25. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
2
Stoma formation for fecal diversion: a plea for the laparoscopic approach.用于粪便改道的造口形成术:呼吁采用腹腔镜手术方法。
Tech Coloproctol. 2005 Apr;9(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s10151-005-0185-6.
3
Standardized technique for single port laparoscopic ileostomy and colostomy.单孔腹腔镜回肠造口术和结肠造口术的标准化技术。
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jul;16(7):O248-52. doi: 10.1111/codi.12601.
4
Scarless single-incision laparoscopic loop ileostomy: a novel technique.无瘢痕单切口腹腔镜套叠式回肠造口术:一种新的技术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1542-6. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822b71eb.
5
Laparoscopic creation of stomas.腹腔镜造口术。
Surg Endosc. 1997 Jan;11(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s004649900287.
6
Single-incision laparoscopic stoma creation: experience with 31 consecutive cases.单切口腹腔镜造口术:31例连续病例的经验
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Aug;6(3):181-5. doi: 10.1111/ases.12034. Epub 2013 May 20.
7
Stoma creation for fecal diversion: is the laparoscopic technique appropriate?用于粪便转流的造口术:腹腔镜技术是否合适?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;13(5-6):251-5. doi: 10.1007/s003840050171.
8
[Single-port laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion - experience of ten consecutive patients].[单孔腹腔镜造口术用于粪便转流——连续十例患者的经验]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(12):1643-4.
9
Laparoscopic techniques for fecal diversion.用于粪便转流的腹腔镜技术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Mar;39(3):285-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02049469.
10
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:前 100 例切除。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.

引用本文的文献

1
Single port-assisted diverting ileostomy formation for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection.单孔辅助转流性回肠造口术用于低位前切除术后吻合口漏
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Mar 15;28(1):47-49. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.1.47.
2
Comparison between liquid skin adhesive and wound closure strip for skin closure after subcuticular suturing in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a single-center retrospective study in Korea.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术后皮下缝合时液体皮肤粘合剂与伤口闭合条用于皮肤闭合的比较:韩国一项单中心回顾性研究
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2024 Mar 15;27(1):14-22. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.1.14.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of single-port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的身体意象和美容效果的荟萃分析。
Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1141-1159. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10574. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
2
Single-incision versus conventional three-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单切口与传统三切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Med. 2017 Aug;10(3):196-206. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12238.
3
Single-incision versus 3-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstones: A prospective randomized study.
有症状胆结石患者单孔与三孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机研究。
Surgery. 2017 Jul;162(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Laparoscopic vs. open surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colonoscopic perforations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗医源性结肠镜穿孔:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Feb 6;12:8. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0121-x. eCollection 2017.
5
Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.087. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
6
Standardized technique for single-incision laparoscopic-assisted stoma creation.单切口腹腔镜辅助造口术的标准化技术
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Aug 10;8(15):541-5. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i15.541.
7
Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗穿孔性消化性溃疡:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Sep;33 Pt A:124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.077. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
8
Cosmesis and Body Image in Patients Undergoing Single-port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Multicenter Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (SPOCC-trial).单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的美容效果和身体形象:一项多中心双盲随机对照试验(SPOCC试验)。
Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):728-34; discussion 734-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001474.
9
Safety and Short-term Outcomes of a Single-Port Laparoscopic Approach to Colorectal Surgery.单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的安全性及短期疗效
JAMA Surg. 2015 Dec;150(12):1195-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2409.
10
[Single-port laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion - experience of ten consecutive patients].[单孔腹腔镜造口术用于粪便转流——连续十例患者的经验]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 Nov;41(12):1643-4.