School of Pharmacy, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, PA, USA.
Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(5):987-995. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1733522. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
To examine the evidence for emerging treatment options, buprenorphine or clonidine, as monotherapy for the treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) against standards of care, morphine or methadone.
A PubMed literature search from 1946 to 2019 was performed using the terms NAS, neonatal withdrawal, buprenorphine and NAS, clonidine and NAS, morphine and NAS, methadone and NAS, opioids and pregnancy, opioids and NAS, prenatal exposure and opioids.
Study evaluation was limited to English-language studies conducted in humans. Articles were eliminated if subjects did not have a formal diagnosis of NAS. Additionally, studies were eliminated if neonates received diluted tincture of opium. Additional references were identified from a manual citation review.
Eight articles were evaluated. Five articles compared buprenorphine to either morphine or methadone. Buprenorphine was found to decrease length of NAS treatment an average of 9.2 days and decrease hospital length of stay (LOS) an average of 8.2 days. Three articles evaluated the use of clonidine for NAS, two as an adjunct to morphine and one as monotherapy. Adjunctive clonidine plus morphine versus phenobarbital plus morphine both significantly reduced the total morphine treatment duration; however, patients remained on adjunctive phenobarbital significantly longer than clonidine. As monotherapy, clonidine was found to decrease NAS treatment an average of 11 days and decrease overall LOS an average of six days compared to morphine treatment.
Treatment with buprenorphine or clonidine has shown favorable effects by reducing length of NAS treatment and LOS. These emerging therapies may be as effective as morphine or methadone for NAS, in combination with nonpharmacologic strategies. Long-term follow-up is needed.
研究丁丙诺啡或可乐定作为单一疗法治疗新生儿戒断综合征(NAS)的证据,与美沙酮或吗啡的治疗标准相比。
使用术语 NAS、新生儿戒断、丁丙诺啡和 NAS、可乐定和 NAS、吗啡和 NAS、美沙酮和 NAS、阿片类药物和妊娠、阿片类药物和 NAS、产前暴露和阿片类药物,对 1946 年至 2019 年的 PubMed 文献进行了检索。
研究评估仅限于在人类中进行的英语语言研究。如果受试者没有正式的 NAS 诊断,则排除这些文章。此外,如果新生儿接受稀释的鸦片酊,则排除这些研究。通过手动引用审查确定了其他参考文献。
评估了 8 篇文章。5 篇文章将丁丙诺啡与吗啡或美沙酮进行了比较。丁丙诺啡可使 NAS 治疗时间平均减少 9.2 天,住院时间(LOS)平均减少 8.2 天。3 篇文章评估了可乐定用于 NAS 的情况,其中 2 篇作为吗啡的辅助治疗,1 篇作为单一疗法。可乐定联合吗啡与苯巴比妥联合吗啡均可显著缩短总吗啡治疗时间;然而,与丁丙诺啡相比,患者仍需接受辅助性苯巴比妥治疗的时间更长。作为单一疗法,与吗啡治疗相比,丁丙诺啡可使 NAS 治疗平均减少 11 天,总 LOS 平均减少 6 天。
丁丙诺啡或可乐定的治疗可通过缩短 NAS 治疗时间和 LOS 来产生有利的效果。这些新兴疗法可能与美沙酮或吗啡一样有效,可结合非药物策略使用。需要进行长期随访。