Pulmonary Circulation Center, Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1164-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
A physiological approach to the analysis of hemodynamic data in pulmonary hypertension (PH) has the advantage of reducing the large number (well over 100) of potential causal illnesses into four simple mechanisms. A fifth condition is composed of mixtures of the four basic mechanisms. This approach was beautifully described by Paul Wood, the great cardiologist whose name is given to the units of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), Wood units. This approach uses well understood physiological contributions to pulmonary vascular pressure. It is powerful, the major uncertainty being in determination of the magnitude of each mechanism in patients that have mixed PH of several causes. It also makes sense of the occasionally awkward clustering of conditions in the clinical classification of the World Symposium, which omits pulmonary vasoconstriction, hyperkinetic states, and the highly prevalent condition of "mixed" PH. This method of analysis is described and demonstrated, much as Wood did in his writings. The method is useful in the office, the ICU, and in consultation. A basic message from this approach is that correct assessment requires measurement of each of the three major inputs, pulmonary arterial pressure (Ppa), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (Pwedge) and cardiac output (CO). Some cases also need left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Other data contributing to analysis will be discussed in each condition. A key to avoiding mistakes is to always remember that PH is simply an elevation in pressure and is not inherently diagnostic of cause.
一种分析肺动脉高压(PH)血流动力学数据的生理学方法具有将大量(超过 100 种)潜在病因疾病简化为四种简单机制的优势。第五种情况由四种基本机制的混合组成。这种方法由伟大的心脏病学家 Paul Wood 出色地描述过,他的名字被赋予了肺血管阻力(PVR)的单位,即 Wood 单位。这种方法使用了对肺血管压力有深入了解的生理学贡献。它非常强大,主要的不确定性在于确定具有多种病因的混合 PH 患者中每种机制的程度。它还解释了世界研讨会临床分类中偶尔出现的条件聚类的情况,该分类省略了肺血管收缩、高动力状态和高度普遍的“混合”PH 条件。这种分析方法与 Wood 在他的著作中所描述的方法类似。该方法在办公室、重症监护室和咨询中都很有用。这种方法的一个基本信息是,正确的评估需要测量三个主要输入中的每一个,即肺动脉压(Ppa)、肺动脉楔压(Pwedge)和心输出量(CO)。有些病例还需要测量左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)。每种情况下还将讨论有助于分析的其他数据。避免错误的关键是始终记住,PH 只是压力升高,本身并不能诊断病因。