• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节或膝关节部分翻修术中阳性术中培养物的流行率和影响。

Prevalence and Impact of Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Partial Hip or Knee Revision.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clinic-IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1912-1916. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.025
PMID:32147341
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim is to investigate the impact of unexpected positive cultures on the outcome of partial prosthetic revisions.

METHODS

Data regarding patients who underwent a partial hip or knee revision from 2003 and 2012 with the preoperative diagnosis of aseptic loosening was retrospectively reviewed. The protocol of revision included at least 3 intraoperative cultures. Failure was defined as the need for re-revision due to aseptic or septic loosening at 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 99 hip and 46 knee partial revisions were included. All cases had at least 5 years of follow-up. Ninety-seven cases (66.9%) had all cultures negative, 35 (24.1%) a single positive culture and 13 (9.0%) ≥2 positive cultures for the same microorganism. The median time from primary arthroplasty to partial revision was significantly shorter for patients with ≥2 positive cultures (26 months) than in those with all cultures negative (48 months) or with a single positive culture (51 months). Partial revisions performed within the first 5 years of implantation had a higher 5-year re-revision rate. The presence of a single positive culture during the partial exchange was not associated with a higher re-revision rate (2 of 35, 5.7%) than in those with negative cultures (3 of 97, 3.1%). On the contrary, re-revision rate was significantly higher in cases with ≥2 positive cultures (3 of 13, 23.1%) than in those with negative cultures (P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Partial revisions performed within the first 5 years from implantation and ≥2 intraoperative positive cultures were associated with a higher re-revision risk at 5 years.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨意外阳性培养对部分假体翻修结局的影响。

方法

回顾性分析了 2003 年至 2012 年期间因无菌性松动而行髋关节或膝关节部分翻修的患者资料。翻修方案包括至少 3 次术中培养。术后 5 年时因无菌性或感染性松动而需再次翻修定义为失败。

结果

共纳入 99 例髋关节和 46 例膝关节部分翻修。所有病例均随访 5 年以上。97 例(66.9%)所有培养均为阴性,35 例(24.1%)仅 1 次培养阳性,13 例(9.0%)同一种微生物≥2 次培养阳性。与所有培养阴性(48 个月)或仅 1 次培养阳性(51 个月)的患者相比,≥2 次培养阳性(26 个月)的患者初次关节置换至部分翻修的中位时间明显缩短。初次翻修后 5 年内进行的部分翻修 5 年再翻修率更高。在部分翻修时仅有 1 次培养阳性与所有培养阴性(3 例中有 2 例,5.7%)相比,再翻修率(3 例中有 2 例,5.7%)并没有更高。相反,与所有培养阴性(3 例中有 1 例,3.1%)相比,≥2 次培养阳性(3 例中有 3 例,23.1%)的病例再翻修率明显更高(P =.02)。

结论

初次翻修后 5 年内进行的部分翻修和≥2 次术中阳性培养与术后 5 年时再翻修风险增加相关。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and Impact of Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Partial Hip or Knee Revision.髋关节或膝关节部分翻修术中阳性术中培养物的流行率和影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1912-1916. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
2
Unexpected low-grade infections in revision hip arthroplasty for aseptic loosening : a single-institution experience of 274 hips.翻修髋关节置换术治疗无菌性松动时出现意外低度感染:单中心 274 髋经验。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6):1070-1077. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-2002.R1.
3
The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection : incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions.隐匿性人工关节感染:在假定无菌的膝关节和髋关节翻修术中术中培养阳性的发生率及后果
Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1482-1489. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2016-0655.R2.
4
Prevalence and Outcomes of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasty.疑似无菌性翻修髋关节置换术中意外阳性术中培养的流行率和结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Aug 4;103(15):1392-1401. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01559.
5
A Single Positive Tissue Culture Increases the Risk of Rerevision of Clinically Aseptic THA: A National Register Study.单次组织培养阳性增加了临床无菌性 THA 再次翻修的风险:一项全国注册研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1372-1381. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000609.
6
A positive bacterial culture during re-implantation is associated with a poor outcome in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for deep infection.再植入过程中细菌培养呈阳性与深部感染二期翻修关节成形术的不良预后相关。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Nov;99-B(11):1490-1495. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2017-0243-R1.
7
Outcome of Total Hip and Total Knee Revision Arthroplasty With Minor Infection Criteria: A Retrospective Matched-Pair Analysis.符合轻度感染标准的全髋关节和全膝关节翻修置换术的结果:一项回顾性配对分析
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1266-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 19.
8
Similar outcomes between two-stage revisions for infection and aseptic hip revisions.感染性髋关节二期翻修与无菌性髋关节翻修的结果相似。
Int Orthop. 2016 Mar;40(3):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2850-3. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
Prevalence and Impact of Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Total Hip or Knee Revision Surgery.全髋关节或膝关节翻修术中意外阳性术中培养的流行率和影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Jan;40(1):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.07.031. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Unsuspected Positive Cultures in Planned Aseptic Revision Knee or Hip Arthroplasty-Risk Factors and Impact on Survivorship.计划进行的无菌性膝关节或髋关节翻修术中意外的阳性培养结果——风险因素及其对假体生存率的影响
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.054. Epub 2022 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Undiagnosed Periprosthetic Infections in First-Time Aseptic Revision Hip Arthroplasties.初次无菌性翻修髋关节置换术中未确诊的假体周围感染
Biomedicines. 2024 Oct 2;12(10):2247. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102247.
2
Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties - A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years.不明原因及疑似无菌性髋关节和膝关节翻修术中意外阳性术中培养物的患病率、危险因素、微生物学结果及临床结局——一项至少随访2年的十年回顾性分析
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Aug 17;48:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Positive Intraoperative Cultures in Cup Revisions of THA: What Happens to the Stem?
全髋关节置换杯翻修术中的阳性术中培养结果:股骨柄会怎样?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 May 1;482(5):779-786. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002873. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
4
Isolated Femoral or Tibial Component Revision in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.全膝关节置换术中孤立的股骨或胫骨组件翻修:一项系统评价
Med Princ Pract. 2023 Sep 20;32(4-5):225-31. doi: 10.1159/000534186.
5
The Role of Single Positive Cultures in Presumed Aseptic Total Hip and Knee Revision Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature.单一阳性培养物在疑似无菌性全髋关节和膝关节翻修手术中的作用——文献系统综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 8;13(9):1655. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091655.
6
Simple and inexpensive synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection according to the new EBJIS definition.根据新的欧洲关节置换学会(EBJIS)定义,用于诊断人工关节感染的简单且廉价的滑液生物标志物。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2023 Mar 29;8(2):109-118. doi: 10.5194/jbji-8-109-2023. eCollection 2023.
7
The Role of the Gut Microbiome on the Development of Surgical Site Infections.肠道微生物群在手术部位感染发生中的作用。
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Jan 19;36(2):133-137. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1760719. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
The European Bone and Joint Infection Society definition of periprosthetic joint infection is meaningful in clinical practice: a multicentric validation study with comparison with previous definitions.欧洲骨与关节感染学会的假体周围关节感染定义在临床实践中有意义:一项多中心验证研究,并与先前的定义进行了比较。
Acta Orthop. 2023 Jan 23;94:8-18. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.5670.
9
Usefulness of serum D-dimer and platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio to rule out chronic periprosthetic joint infection.血清D-二聚体及血小板计数与平均血小板体积比值对排除人工关节周围慢性感染的效用。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2022 May 17;7(3):109-115. doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-109-2022. eCollection 2022.
10
Prevalence, interpretation, and management of unexpected positive cultures in revision TKA: a systematic review.翻修全膝关节置换术后阳性培养的发生率、解读和处理:系统评价。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Dec;30(12):3998-4009. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06856-6. Epub 2022 Jan 15.