Suppr超能文献

在年轻活跃患者的前交叉韧带重建中增加外侧关节外固定术对功能结果无影响:稳定性研究。

No Difference in Functional Outcomes When Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Added to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Young Active Patients: The Stability Study.

机构信息

Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2020 Jun;36(6):1690-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the functional outcomes of patients included in the Stability Study randomized controlled trial comparing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) alone with ACLR with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

METHODS

Six hundred eighteen patients undergoing ACLR, all under the age of 25 years either returning to contact pivoting sport or displaying signs of high-grade rotatory laxity or generalized ligamentous laxity, were randomly assigned to receive ACLR alone or ACLR plus LET. A total of 356 of these patients were randomized at centers participating in the functional assessments. Our primary outcome was Limb Symmetry Index, calculated using a series of 4-hop tests at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included pain, patient-reported function, and isokinetic strength testing.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients either unwilling or unfit to complete the hop testing in the ACLR alone or ACLR with LET group at 6 months (40 vs 40 respectively; P = 1.00), 12 months (25 vs 27; P = .76), and 24 months (21 vs 23; P = .87). Of those who completed hop testing, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in Limb Symmetry Index at 6, 12, or 24 months. Self-reported function (Lower Extremity Functional Score) significantly favored the ACLR alone group at 3 (P = .01) and 6 months (P = .02) postoperative but was similar by 12 months postoperative. Pain scores (P4) also showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the ACL alone group, but this also resolved by 6 months. Quadriceps peak torque (P = .03) and average power (P = .01) were also significantly different in favor of the ACLR alone group at 6 months postoperative; however, these were similar between groups by 12 months postoperative (P = .11 and P = .32, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a LET to ACLR results in slightly increased pain, a mild reduction in quadriceps strength, and reduced subjective functional recovery up to 6 months postoperatively. However, these differences do not have any impact on objective function as measured by hop test limb symmetry index.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I, Randomized Controlled Trial.

摘要

目的

评估稳定性研究中随机对照试验中纳入的患者的功能结果,该研究比较了单独前交叉韧带重建 (ACLR) 与 ACLR 联合外侧关节外肌腱固定术 (LET) 在术后 6、12 和 24 个月的功能。

方法

618 例年龄均小于 25 岁的 ACLR 患者,均因重返接触式旋转运动或出现高级别的旋转松弛或广泛性韧带松弛而接受手术,随机分为单独接受 ACLR 或 ACLR 联合 LET 治疗。其中 356 例患者在参与功能评估的中心被随机分配。我们的主要结局指标是术后 6、12 和 24 个月采用一系列 4 跳测试计算的肢体对称性指数。次要结局指标包括疼痛、患者报告的功能和等速力量测试。

结果

我们发现,在术后 6 个月(分别为 40%和 40%;P=1.00)、12 个月(分别为 25%和 27%;P=0.76)和 24 个月(分别为 21%和 23%;P=0.87)时,单独接受 ACLR 或 ACLR 联合 LET 治疗的患者中,不愿意或不适合完成跳跃测试的患者比例在两组之间无统计学显著差异。在完成跳跃测试的患者中,6、12 和 24 个月时两组之间的肢体对称性指数无统计学显著差异。术后 3 个月(P=0.01)和 6 个月(P=0.02)时,患者报告的功能(下肢功能评分)明显偏向单独接受 ACLR 治疗的组,但术后 12 个月时两组相似。术后 6 个月时,疼痛评分(P4)也明显偏向单独接受 ACLR 治疗的组,但也在 6 个月时得到缓解。术后 6 个月时,股四头肌峰值扭矩(P=0.03)和平均功率(P=0.01)也明显偏向单独接受 ACLR 治疗的组;然而,术后 12 个月时两组之间无差异(P=0.11 和 P=0.32)。

结论

与单独接受 ACLR 相比,联合 LET 会略微增加疼痛,轻度降低股四头肌力量,并在术后 6 个月内导致主观功能恢复减少。然而,这些差异对跳跃测试肢体对称性指数所测量的客观功能没有任何影响。

证据等级

I,随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验