Gan Zoe S, Ehlers Mark E, Lin Feng-Chang, Wright Sarah T, Figler Bradley D, Coward R Matthew
University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sex Med Rev. 2021 Apr;9(2):304-311. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
Conflicting evidence exists on the relationship between bicycle riding and erectile dysfunction (ED). A major limitation to several prior studies is the lack of a validated measure of ED.
To assess the relationship between cycling and clinically validated ED based on existing literature.
We searched several major databases from database inception through 2018 using a variety of search terms relating to "cycling" and "erectile dysfunction." Studies were included if they were written in English, reported original data, compared ED between cyclists and non-cycling controls, and used a validated measure of ED, such as the International Index of Erectile Function or the subset Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM). Age, SHIM score, and comorbidities were extracted for all groups. Primary outcomes for each group were mean SHIM score and presence of ED (SHIM ≤ 21). A generalized linear mixed-effects model was used to fit the collected data for meta-analysis. Main outcome measures were unadjusted odds ratios of ED for cyclists and non-cyclists, mean SHIM score difference between cyclists and noncyclists, and both of these measures adjusted for age and comorbidities.
After a systematic evaluation of 843 studies, 6 studies met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 3,330 cyclists and 1,524 non-cycling controls. When comparing cyclists to non-cyclists in an unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences in the odds of having ED or mean SHIM score. However, when controlling for age and comorbidities, cyclists had significantly higher odds of having ED (odds ratio: 2.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.57, 2.55).
Limited evidence supports a positive correlation between cycling and ED when adjusting for age and several comorbidities. Heterogeneity among studies suggests that further investigation into certain populations of cyclists that may be more vulnerable to ED may be beneficial. Gan ZS, Ehlers ME, Lin FC, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cycling and Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med 2021;9:304-311.
关于骑自行车与勃起功能障碍(ED)之间的关系,存在相互矛盾的证据。先前多项研究的一个主要局限性是缺乏对ED的有效测量方法。
根据现有文献评估骑行与经临床验证的ED之间的关系。
我们从数据库建立之初到2018年,使用与“骑行”和“勃起功能障碍”相关的各种搜索词,搜索了几个主要数据库。纳入的研究需为英文撰写、报告原始数据、比较骑行者与非骑行对照者之间的ED情况,并使用了ED的有效测量方法,如国际勃起功能指数或男性性健康量表(SHIM)的子量表。提取所有组的年龄、SHIM评分和合并症。每组的主要结局为平均SHIM评分和ED的存在情况(SHIM≤21)。使用广义线性混合效应模型对收集的数据进行拟合以进行荟萃分析。主要结局指标为骑行者与非骑行者ED的未调整比值比、骑行者与非骑行者之间的平均SHIM评分差异,以及这两个指标在调整年龄和合并症后的情况。
在对843项研究进行系统评估后,6项研究符合我们的纳入标准,涵盖3330名骑行者和1524名非骑行对照者。在未调整分析中比较骑行者与非骑行者时,患ED的几率或平均SHIM评分没有显著差异。然而,在控制年龄和合并症后,骑行者患ED的几率显著更高(比值比:2.00;95%置信区间:1.57,2.55)。
有限的证据支持在调整年龄和几种合并症后,骑行与ED之间存在正相关。研究之间的异质性表明,对某些可能更容易患ED的骑行者群体进行进一步调查可能是有益的。甘ZS、埃勒斯ME、林FC等。骑行与勃起功能障碍的系统评价和荟萃分析。性医学2021;9:304 - 311。