Suppr超能文献

一项关于男性身体活动与生育能力的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study of male physical activity and fecundability.

作者信息

Wise Lauren A, Wang Tanran R, Ulrichsen Sinna Pilgaard, Krivorotko Dmitrii, Mikkelsen Ellen M, Kuriyama Andrea S, Laursen Anne Sofie Dam, Jørgensen Marie Dahl, Eisenberg Michael L, Rothman Kenneth J, Sorensen Henrik Toft, Hatch Elizabeth E

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2025 Feb 1;40(2):360-371. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae275.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

To what extent is male physical activity (PA) associated with fecundability (per-cycle probability of conception)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Preconception levels of vigorous, moderate, or total PA were not consistently associated with fecundability across Danish and North American cohorts, but there was suggestive evidence that bicycling with a 'soft, comfort seat' was associated with reduced fecundability in both cohorts, especially among males with greater BMI.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Among males, some studies indicate that moderate PA might improve fertility, whereas vigorous PA, especially bicycling, might be detrimental.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We assessed the association between male PA and fecundability among couples participating in two preconception cohort studies: SnartForaeldre.dk (SF) in Denmark (2011-2023) and Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) in North America (2013-2024). We restricted analyses to 4921 males (1088 in SF and 3833 in PRESTO) who had been trying to conceive with their partners for ≤6 cycles at enrollment.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: At baseline, male partners reported data on medical history, lifestyle, behavioral, anthropometric factors, and their PA levels using different instruments [SF: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ); PRESTO: average annual hours/week and type]. Both cohorts included additional questions on bicycling (frequency, bike seat type). After linking couple data at baseline, the female partner completed follow-up questionnaires to update their pregnancy status every 8 weeks for 12 months or until conception, whichever occurred first. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios (FRs) and 95% CIs, controlling for potential confounders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Average hours/week of vigorous PA, moderate PA, and total metabolic equivalents of task were generally inversely associated with fecundability in SF, but not PRESTO. While there was little association with bicycling overall in either cohort, we observed an inverse association for bicycling using a 'soft, comfort seat' (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.53-1.05; PRESTO: FR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62-1.07) but not a 'hard, racing-style seat' (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95-1.41; PRESTO: FR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.89-1.28). Among males with BMI ≥25 kg/m2, associations with bicycling using a 'soft, comfort seat' were similar or stronger (≥3 vs 0 h/week: SF: FR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45-1.24; PRESTO: FR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.52-1.03).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Misclassification of PA was likely the most important study limitation because we ascertained PA only once at enrollment using different instruments in each cohort. We would expect misclassification of PA to be non-differential given the prospective study design. Additional weaknesses include the narrow range of PA levels evaluated, reduced precision when stratifying the data by selected covariates, and limited generalizability due to the large percentage of non-Hispanic White participants and restriction of the cohort to pregnancy planners.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Further evaluation of the potential deleterious effects of bicycling on male fertility, with additional consideration of the influence of bike seat type and BMI, may be warranted.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by NICHD Grants R21-HD072326, R01-HD086742, R01 HD105863, and R03-HD094117. These funding bodies had no involvement in the: study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the report; or decision to submit the article for publication. L.A.W. serves as a paid consultant for AbbVie, Inc. and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. She also receives in-kind donations for primary data collection in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) from Swiss Precision Diagnostics (home pregnancy tests) and Kindara.com (fertility apps). All of these relationships are for work unrelated to this manuscript. M.L.E. is an advisor for and holds stock in Legacy, Doveras, VSeat, Hannah, Illumicell, HisTurn, & Next. The other authors have no competing interests to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

摘要

研究问题

男性身体活动(PA)与受孕能力(每个周期的受孕概率)有多大程度的关联?

总结答案

丹麦和北美队列中,孕前高强度、中等强度或总身体活动水平与受孕能力之间并无一致关联,但有迹象表明,在两个队列中,使用“柔软舒适座椅”骑自行车与受孕能力降低有关,尤其是在BMI较高的男性中。

已知信息

在男性中,一些研究表明中等强度的身体活动可能会提高生育能力,而高强度身体活动,尤其是骑自行车,可能会产生不利影响。

研究设计、规模、持续时间:我们评估了参与两项孕前队列研究的夫妇中男性身体活动与受孕能力之间的关联:丹麦的SnartForaeldre.dk(SF,2011 - 2023年)和北美的在线妊娠研究(PRESTO,2013 - 2024年)。我们将分析限制在4921名男性(SF组1088名,PRESTO组3833名),这些男性在入组时与其伴侣尝试受孕≤6个周期。

参与者/材料、设置、方法:在基线时,男性伴侣使用不同工具报告病史、生活方式、行为、人体测量因素及身体活动水平的数据[SF:国际身体活动问卷(IPAQ);PRESTO:平均每年每周小时数及类型]。两个队列都包括关于骑自行车的额外问题(频率、自行车座椅类型)。在将夫妇基线数据关联后,女性伴侣每8周完成一次随访问卷,以更新其妊娠状态,为期12个月或直至受孕,以先发生者为准。我们使用比例概率回归模型来估计受孕能力比率(FRs)和95%置信区间(CIs),并控制潜在混杂因素。

主要结果及机遇的作用

在SF队列中,每周高强度身体活动的平均小时数、中等强度身体活动以及总代谢当量任务通常与受孕能力呈负相关,但在PRESTO队列中并非如此。虽然两个队列中总体上骑自行车与受孕能力关联不大,但我们观察到使用“柔软舒适座椅”骑自行车存在负相关(每周≥3小时与0小时相比:SF:FR = 0.75,95% CI:0.53 - 1.05;PRESTO:FR = 0.81,95% CI:0.62 - 1.07),而使用“硬式竞赛风格座椅”则无此关联(每周≥3小时与0小时相比:SF:FR = 1.16,95% CI:0.95 - 1.41;PRESTO:FR = 1.06,95% CI:0.89 - 1.28)。在BMI≥25 kg/m²的男性中,使用“柔软舒适座椅”骑自行车的关联相似或更强(每周≥3小时与0小时相比:SF:FR = 0.75,95% CI:0.45 - 1.24;PRESTO:FR = 0.73,95% CI:0.52 - 1.03)。

局限性、注意事项:身体活动的错误分类可能是最重要的研究局限性,因为我们在每个队列入组时仅使用不同工具确定了一次身体活动情况。鉴于前瞻性研究设计,我们预计身体活动的错误分类是非差异性的。其他弱点包括评估的身体活动水平范围狭窄、按选定协变量对数据分层时精度降低以及由于非西班牙裔白人参与者比例较大且队列仅限于计划怀孕者导致的可推广性有限。

研究结果的更广泛影响

可能有必要进一步评估骑自行车对男性生育能力的潜在有害影响,并额外考虑自行车座椅类型和BMI的影响。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究由美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所(NICHD)的R21 - HD072326、R01 - HD086742、R01 HD105863和R03 - HD094117资助。这些资助机构未参与:研究设计;数据的收集、分析和解释;报告的撰写;或提交文章发表的决定。L.A.W.担任艾伯维公司和比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会的付费顾问。她还从瑞士精密诊断公司(家用妊娠测试)和Kindara.com(生育应用程序)获得在线妊娠研究(PRESTO)主要数据收集的实物捐赠。所有这些关系均与本手稿无关。M.L.E.是Legacy、Doveras、VSeat、Hannah、Illumicell、HisTurn和Next的顾问并持有股份。其他作者无利益冲突声明。

试验注册号

无。

相似文献

5
Male alcohol consumption and fecundability.男性饮酒与生育力。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Apr 28;35(4):816-825. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez294.

本文引用的文献

9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验