Suppr超能文献

接触力引导导管消融治疗室性早搏的益处。

Benefit of Contact Force-Guided Catheter Ablation for Treating Premature Ventricular Contractions.

作者信息

Zhao Ziming, Liu Xiaowei, Gao Lianjun, Xi Yutao, Chen Qi, Chang Dong, Xiao Xianjie, Cheng Jie, Yang Yanzong, Xia Yunlong, Yin Xiaomeng

出版信息

Tex Heart Inst J. 2020 Feb 1;47(1):3-9. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-17-6441. eCollection 2020 Feb.

Abstract

We evaluated whether an irrigated contact force-sensing catheter would improve the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with symptomatic premature ventricular contractions who underwent ablation with a contact force-sensing catheter (56 patients, SmartTouch) or conventional catheter (59 patients, ThermoCool) at our hospital from August 2013 through December 2015. During a mean follow-up of 16 ± 5 months, 3 patients in the conventional group had recurrences, compared with none in the contact force group. Complications occurred only in the conventional group (one steam pop; 2 ablations suspended because of significantly increasing impedance). In the contact force group, the median contact force during ablation was 10 g (interquartile range, 7-14 g). Times for overall procedure (36.9 ± 5 min), fluoroscopy (86.3 ± 22.7 s), and ablation (60.3 ± 21.4 s) were significantly shorter in the contact force group than in the conventional group (46.2 ± 6.2 min, 107.7 ± 30 s, and 88.7 ± 32.3 s, respectively; <0.001). In the contact force group, cases with a force-time integral <560 gram-seconds (g-s) had significantly longer procedure and fluoroscopy times (both <0.001) than did those with a force-time integral ≥560 g-s. These findings suggest that ablation of premature ventricular contractions originating from the right ventricular outflow tract with an irrigated contact force-sensing catheter instead of a conventional catheter shortens overall procedure, fluoroscopy, and ablation times without increasing risk of recurrence or complications.

摘要

我们评估了一种灌注式接触力传感导管是否会提高对源自右心室流出道的室性早搏进行射频消融的安全性和有效性。我们回顾性分析了2013年8月至2015年12月期间在我院接受使用接触力传感导管(56例患者,SmartTouch)或传统导管(59例患者,ThermoCool)进行消融的有症状室性早搏患者的病历。在平均16±5个月的随访期间,传统组有3例患者复发,而接触力组无复发。并发症仅发生在传统组(1例蒸汽泡;2例因阻抗显著增加而中止消融)。在接触力组中,消融期间的中位接触力为10 g(四分位间距,7 - 14 g)。接触力组的总手术时间(36.9±5分钟)、透视时间(86.3±22.7秒)和消融时间(60.3±21.4秒)显著短于传统组(分别为46.2±6.2分钟、107.7±30秒和88.7±32.3秒;<0.001)。在接触力组中,力 - 时间积分<560克 - 秒(g - s)的病例的手术时间和透视时间均显著长于力 - 时间积分≥560 g - s的病例(均<0.001)。这些发现表明,使用灌注式接触力传感导管而非传统导管对源自右心室流出道的室性早搏进行消融可缩短总手术时间、透视时间和消融时间,且不会增加复发或并发症风险。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验