• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Progress towards using community context with clinical data in primary care.在初级保健中将社区背景与临床数据相结合的进展。
Fam Med Community Health. 2018 Dec 6;7(1):e000028. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000028. eCollection 2019.
2
"Community vital signs": incorporating geocoded social determinants into electronic records to promote patient and population health.“社区生命体征”:将地理编码的社会决定因素纳入电子记录以促进患者和人群健康。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):407-12. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv088. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
3
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
4
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
5
Community Health Worker Programs to Improve Healthcare Access and Equity: Are They Only Relevant to Low- and Middle-Income Countries?社区卫生工作者项目改善医疗可及性和公平性:它们仅与低收入和中等收入国家相关吗?
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Oct 1;7(10):943-954. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.53.
6
Community Vital Signs: Taking the Pulse of the Community While Caring for Patients.社区生命体征:在照顾患者的同时把握社区的脉搏。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):419-22. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.03.150172.
7
Adoption of Social Determinants of Health EHR Tools by Community Health Centers.社区卫生中心采用健康电子病历中的社会决定因素工具。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 Sep;16(5):399-407. doi: 10.1370/afm.2275.
8
Do quality improvement initiatives for diabetes care address social inequities? Secondary analysis of a systematic review.糖尿病护理的质量改进举措是否解决了社会不平等问题?一项系统评价的二次分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 14;8(2):e018826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018826.
9
A public health perspective on using electronic health records to address social determinants of health: The potential for a national system of local community health records in the United States.从公共卫生角度看利用电子健康记录解决健康的社会决定因素:在美国建立国家社区卫生记录系统的潜力。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Apr;124:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
10
Mapping Neighborhood Health Geomarkers To Clinical Care Decisions To Promote Equity In Child Health.绘制邻里健康地理标记以辅助临床决策,促进儿童健康公平。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1425.

引用本文的文献

1
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Events in Adults With CKD: The CRIC Study.社区社会经济地位与慢性肾脏病成人患者的心血管事件:慢性肾脏病队列研究(CRIC研究)
Kidney Med. 2024 Sep 12;6(11):100901. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100901. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Observing Provider Utilization of Electronic Health Records to Improve Clinical Quality Metrics.观察医疗服务提供者对电子健康记录的使用情况,以改善临床质量指标。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1o. eCollection 2022 Winter.
3
How French general practitioners adapt their care to patients with social difficulties?法国全科医生如何调整他们的护理以适应有社会困难的患者?
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Nov 3;7(4):e000044. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000044. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The health gap: Doctors and the social determinants of health.健康差距:医生与健康的社会决定因素
Scand J Public Health. 2017 Nov;45(7):686-693. doi: 10.1177/1403494817717448.
2
Enhancing Electronic Health Record Data with Geospatial Information.利用地理空间信息增强电子健康记录数据
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2017 Jul 26;2017:123-132. eCollection 2017.
3
American Academy of Nursing Endorses Social Behavioral Determinants of Health in Electronic Health Records.美国护理学会认可电子健康记录中健康的社会行为决定因素。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2017 Jul;35(7):329-330. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000372.
4
Mapping Neighborhood Health Geomarkers To Clinical Care Decisions To Promote Equity In Child Health.绘制邻里健康地理标记以辅助临床决策,促进儿童健康公平。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jun 1;36(6):999-1005. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1425.
5
Utilizing patient geographic information system data to plan telemedicine service locations.利用患者地理信息系统数据规划远程医疗服务地点。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):891-896. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx011.
6
Integrating Social And Medical Data To Improve Population Health: Opportunities And Barriers.整合社会与医学数据以改善人群健康:机遇与障碍
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):2116-2123. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0723.
7
CommunityRx: A Population Health Improvement Innovation That Connects Clinics To Communities.社区处方:一项将诊所与社区相连接的改善人群健康的创新举措。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):2020-2029. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0694.
8
How Other Countries Use Deprivation Indices-And Why The United States Desperately Needs One.其他国家如何使用贫困指数——以及为何美国迫切需要一个贫困指数。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Nov 1;35(11):1991-1998. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0709.
9
Neighborhood deprivation and depression in adult twins: genetics and gene×environment interaction.成年双胞胎的邻里贫困与抑郁:遗传学及基因×环境交互作用
Psychol Med. 2017 Mar;47(4):627-638. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002622. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
The Association Between Neighborhood Environment and Mortality: Results from a National Study of Veterans.邻里环境与死亡率之间的关联:一项退伍军人全国性研究的结果
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):416-422. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3905-x. Epub 2016 Nov 4.

在初级保健中将社区背景与临床数据相结合的进展。

Progress towards using community context with clinical data in primary care.

作者信息

Angier Heather, Jacobs Elizabeth A, Huguet Nathalie, Likumahuwa-Ackman Sonja, Robert Stephanie, DeVoe Jennifer E

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Fam Med Community Health. 2018 Dec 6;7(1):e000028. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000028. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1136/fmch-2018-000028
PMID:32148692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6951248/
Abstract

Community-level factors have significant impacts on health. There is renewed enthusiasm for integrating these data with electronic health record (EHR) data for use in primary care to improve health equity in the USA. Thus, it is valuable to reflect on what has been published to date. Specifically, we comment on: (1) recommendations about combining community-level factors in EHRs for use in primary care; (2) examples of how these data have been combined and used; and (3) the impact of using combined data on healthcare, patient health and health equity. We found publications discussing the potential of combined data to inform clinical care, target interventions, track population health and spark community partnerships with the goal of reducing health disparities and improving health equity. Although there is great enthusiasm and potential for using these data to inform primary care, there is little evidence of improved healthcare, patient health or health equity.

摘要

社区层面的因素对健康有重大影响。人们重新燃起了将这些数据与电子健康记录(EHR)数据整合用于初级保健以改善美国健康公平性的热情。因此,反思迄今为止已发表的内容很有价值。具体而言,我们评论:(1)关于在初级保健中在电子健康记录中结合社区层面因素的建议;(2)这些数据如何被结合和使用的示例;以及(3)使用合并数据对医疗保健、患者健康和健康公平性的影响。我们发现有出版物讨论了合并数据在为临床护理提供信息、确定干预目标、跟踪人群健康以及促进社区伙伴关系以减少健康差距和改善健康公平性方面的潜力。尽管使用这些数据为初级保健提供信息有很大的热情和潜力,但几乎没有证据表明医疗保健、患者健康或健康公平性得到了改善。