• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观察医疗服务提供者对电子健康记录的使用情况,以改善临床质量指标。

Observing Provider Utilization of Electronic Health Records to Improve Clinical Quality Metrics.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1o. eCollection 2022 Winter.

PMID:35440927
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9013221/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study compared changes of healthcare quality in a Michigan Medicaid population before and after physician adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) via the Meaningful Use (MU) program for selected Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality of care measures.

METHODS

Healthcare measures included well-child visits, cancer screening, and chronic illness quality measures. Utilization data were obtained from Medicaid paid claims and encounter data with providers (N=291) receiving their first MU incentive in 2014 and at least one HEDIS-defined outpatient visit with a Michigan Medicaid enrollee. Paired t-tests with a repeated measures design were utilized to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Improvements in quality of infant well-child visits (mean difference = 10.2) and colorectal cancer screening (mean difference = 8.0 percent) were observed. We found no change or slight decreases for the other selected measures.

CONCLUSION

These outcomes inform the performance and ability of EHRs to improve quality of healthcare standards particularly as technology continues to evolve under the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Interoperability and Patient Access final rule.

摘要

简介

本研究通过医疗保健效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)中选定的医疗保健质量措施的“有意义的使用”(MU)计划,比较了密歇根州医疗补助人群中医疗质量在医生采用电子健康记录(EHR)前后的变化。

方法

医疗保健措施包括儿童健康检查、癌症筛查和慢性病质量措施。利用医疗补助支付的索赔和与提供者的就诊数据(N=291)获得数据,这些提供者在 2014 年获得了第一个 MU 激励,并且至少有一名密歇根州医疗补助受保人进行了 HEDIS 定义的门诊就诊。采用具有重复测量设计的配对 t 检验来分析数据。

结果

观察到婴儿健康检查(平均差异=10.2)和结直肠癌筛查(平均差异=8.0%)质量的提高。对于其他选定的措施,我们没有发现变化或略有下降。

结论

这些结果为 EHR 提高医疗保健标准质量的绩效和能力提供了信息,特别是随着医疗保健服务中心(CMS)互操作性和患者访问最终规则下技术的不断发展。

相似文献

1
Observing Provider Utilization of Electronic Health Records to Improve Clinical Quality Metrics.观察医疗服务提供者对电子健康记录的使用情况,以改善临床质量指标。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1o. eCollection 2022 Winter.
2
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program--Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 Through 2017. Final rules with comment period.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;电子健康记录激励计划——2015年至2017年的第3阶段及对有意义使用的修改。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2015 Oct 16;80(200):62761-955.
3
Medicare and Medicaid programs; modifications to the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program for 2014 and other changes to EHR Incentive Program; and health information technology: revision to the certified EHR technology definition and EHR certification changes related to standards. Final rule.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;2014年医疗保险和医疗补助电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划的修改及EHR激励计划的其他变更;以及健康信息技术:对经认证的EHR技术定义的修订和与标准相关的EHR认证变更。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2014 Sep 4;79(171):52909-33.
4
Growth Of New York Physician Participation In Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Records Was Variable, 2011-12.纽约医生参与电子健康记录的使用在 2011-2012 年有所不同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):1035-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1189.
5
The Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program: provider performance on core and menu measures.医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划:核心和菜单指标的提供者表现。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1 Pt 2):325-46. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12134. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
6
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2019 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs (Promoting Interoperability Programs) Requirements for Eligible Hospitals, Critical Access Hospitals, and Eligible Professionals; Medicare Cost Reporting Requirements; and Physician Certification and Recertification of Claims. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统和政策变更与2019财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;医疗保险和医疗补助电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划(促进互操作性计划)对合格医院、临界接入医院和合格专业人员的要求;医疗保险成本报告要求;以及医师对索赔的认证和重新认证。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2018 Aug 17;83(160):41144-784.
7
Electronic Medical Record Use and Maternal and Child Care and Health.电子病历的使用与母婴保健
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Apr;20(4):819-26. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1912-x.
8
Provider perceptions of the electronic health record incentive programs: a survey of eligible professionals who have and have not attested to meaningful use.医疗服务提供者对电子健康记录激励计划的看法:对已证实和未证实有意义使用的合格专业人员的调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):123-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3008-5.
9
The Impact of Market Factors on Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records Among Primary Care Providers: Evidence From Florida Using Resource Dependence Theory and Information Uncertainty Perspective.市场因素对初级保健提供者有效使用电子健康记录的影响:来自佛罗里达州的证据,运用资源依赖理论和信息不确定性视角
Med Care. 2024 Apr 1;62(4):256-262. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001980. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
10
Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs; Organ Procurement Organization Reporting and Communication; Transplant Outcome Measures and Documentation Requirements; Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs; Payment to Nonexcepted Off-Campus Provider-Based Department of a Hospital; Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program; Establishment of Payment Rates Under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Nonexcepted Items and Services Furnished by an Off-Campus Provider-Based Department of a Hospital. Final rule with comment period and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划:医院门诊前瞻性支付和门诊手术中心支付系统及质量报告计划;器官采购组织报告与沟通;移植结果衡量与文件要求;电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划;向医院非豁免校外基于提供者的科室付款;医院基于价值的采购(VBP)计划;确定医疗保险医师费率表下医院校外基于提供者的科室提供的非豁免项目和服务的支付费率。带有意见征求期的最终规则和带有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 14;81(219):79562-892.

本文引用的文献

1
Using Technology to Combat Clinician Burnout.利用技术应对临床医生 burnout(职业倦怠)。
J Healthc Manag. 2020 Jul-Aug;65(4):265-272. doi: 10.1097/JHM-D-20-00099.
2
Progress towards using community context with clinical data in primary care.在初级保健中将社区背景与临床数据相结合的进展。
Fam Med Community Health. 2018 Dec 6;7(1):e000028. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000028. eCollection 2019.
3
Physician Time Spent Using the Electronic Health Record During Outpatient Encounters: A Descriptive Study.医生在门诊就诊期间使用电子健康记录的时间:一项描述性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 4;172(3):169-174. doi: 10.7326/M18-3684. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
Electronic Health Record Time Among Outpatient Physicians: Reflections on the Who, What, and Why.门诊医生的电子健康记录时间:关于何人、何事及为何的思考
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 4;172(3):212-213. doi: 10.7326/M19-3921. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
The Association Between Perceived Electronic Health Record Usability and Professional Burnout Among US Physicians.美国医生感知的电子健康记录易用性与职业倦怠之间的关联。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Mar;95(3):476-487. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
6
Meaningful Use: Does Physician Participation Move the Needle on Quality Metrics?有意义的使用:医生的参与是否能推动质量指标的提升?
J Healthc Qual. 2019 Nov/Dec;41(6):e70-e76. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000210.
7
Gaps in Well-Child Care Attendance Among Primary Care Clinics Serving Low-Income Families.服务低收入家庭的基层医疗诊所中儿童常规保健就诊的差距。
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4019. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Physician Beliefs about the Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record: A Follow-Up Study.医生对电子健康记录有意义使用的看法:一项随访研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct;8(4):1044-1053. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-05-RA-0079. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
9
Electronic clinical quality measure reporting challenges: findings from the Medicare EHR Incentive Program's Controlling High Blood Pressure Measure.电子临床质量衡量报告挑战:来自医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划控制高血压衡量标准的发现。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):127-134. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx049.
10
Short-term Impact of Meaningful Use Stage 1 Implementation: A Comparison of Health Outcomes in 2 Primary Care Clinics.有意义使用阶段1实施的短期影响:两家基层医疗诊所健康结果的比较
J Ambul Care Manage. 2017 Oct/Dec;40(4):316-326. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000179.