Suppr超能文献

脓毒症中的液体复苏:每千克30毫升的大骗局。

Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax.

作者信息

Marik Paul E, Byrne Liam, van Haren Frank

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.

Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S37-S47. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.84.

Abstract

Large volume fluid resuscitation is currently viewed as the cornerstone of the treatment of septic shock. The surviving sepsis campaign (SSC) guidelines provide a strong recommendation to rapidly administer a minimum of 30 mL/kg crystalloid solution intravenously in all patients with septic shock and those with elevated blood lactate levels. However, there is no credible evidence to support this recommendation. In fact, recent findings from experimental, observational and randomized clinical trials demonstrate improved outcomes with a more restrictive approach to fluid resuscitation. Accumulating evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation is harmful. Paradoxically, excess fluid administration may worsen shock. In this review, we critically evaluate the scientific evidence for a weight-based fluid resuscitation approach. Furthermore, the potential mechanisms and consequences of harm associated with fluid resuscitation are discussed. Finally, we recommend an individualized, conservative and physiologic guided approach to fluid resuscitation.

摘要

目前,大量液体复苏被视为治疗感染性休克的基石。拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)指南强烈建议,对于所有感染性休克患者以及血乳酸水平升高的患者,应迅速静脉输注至少30 mL/kg的晶体溶液。然而,没有可靠的证据支持这一建议。事实上,近期实验、观察性和随机临床试验的结果表明,采用更严格的液体复苏方法可改善预后。越来越多的证据表明,积极的液体复苏是有害的。矛盾的是,过量给予液体可能会使休克恶化。在本综述中,我们批判性地评估了基于体重的液体复苏方法的科学证据。此外,还讨论了与液体复苏相关的危害的潜在机制和后果。最后,我们建议采用个体化、保守且以生理学为指导的液体复苏方法。

相似文献

1
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S37-S47. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.84.
2
New Insights into the Fluid Management in Patients with Septic Shock.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 29;59(6):1047. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061047.
4
Challenges With Using a Weight-Based Approach to Bolus Fluid Dosing in Obese Critically Ill Patients.
Ann Pharmacother. 2023 May;57(5):609-616. doi: 10.1177/10600280221125169. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
6
What is the Preferred Resuscitation Fluid for Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock?
J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):928-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.093. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
9
Fluid Resuscitation in Severe Sepsis.
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;35(1):59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.08.001.
10
Associated Mortality of Liberal Fluid Administration in Sepsis.
J Pharm Pract. 2019 Oct;32(5):579-583. doi: 10.1177/0897190018759857. Epub 2018 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

2
Why Has Biomarker-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Sepsis Not Been Implemented in Clinical Practice?
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Jun 9;7(6):e1274. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001274. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
3
The Association Between Time to Completion of at Least 30 mL/kg and Hospital Outcomes Among Patients With Septic Shock.
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Apr 28;7(5):e1253. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001253. eCollection 2025 May 1.
5
Lessons from the similarities and differences in fluid resuscitation between burns and sepsis: a bibliometric analysis.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 4;12:1561619. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1561619. eCollection 2025.
6
An ovine septic shock model of live bacterial infusion.
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Oct 28;12(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00684-x.
7
Optimal fluid resuscitation targets in septic patients with acutely decompensated heart failure.
BMC Med. 2024 Oct 24;22(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03715-2.
8
Survival prediction for heart failure complicated by sepsis: based on machine learning methods.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 3;11:1410702. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1410702. eCollection 2024.
10
The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock.
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;5(3):456-478. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5030032.

本文引用的文献

2
Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;45(10):1440-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05713-y. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
3
Intravenous fluid resuscitation is associated with septic endothelial glycocalyx degradation.
Crit Care. 2019 Jul 23;23(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2534-2.
6
We should avoid the term "fluid overload".
Crit Care. 2018 Sep 11;22(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2141-7.
7
Unintended Consequences: Fluid Resuscitation Worsens Shock in an Ovine Model of Endotoxemia.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct 15;198(8):1043-1054. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0064OC.
8
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update.
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0. Epub 2018 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验