Marik Paul E, Byrne Liam, van Haren Frank
Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S37-S47. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.84.
Large volume fluid resuscitation is currently viewed as the cornerstone of the treatment of septic shock. The surviving sepsis campaign (SSC) guidelines provide a strong recommendation to rapidly administer a minimum of 30 mL/kg crystalloid solution intravenously in all patients with septic shock and those with elevated blood lactate levels. However, there is no credible evidence to support this recommendation. In fact, recent findings from experimental, observational and randomized clinical trials demonstrate improved outcomes with a more restrictive approach to fluid resuscitation. Accumulating evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation is harmful. Paradoxically, excess fluid administration may worsen shock. In this review, we critically evaluate the scientific evidence for a weight-based fluid resuscitation approach. Furthermore, the potential mechanisms and consequences of harm associated with fluid resuscitation are discussed. Finally, we recommend an individualized, conservative and physiologic guided approach to fluid resuscitation.
目前,大量液体复苏被视为治疗感染性休克的基石。拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)指南强烈建议,对于所有感染性休克患者以及血乳酸水平升高的患者,应迅速静脉输注至少30 mL/kg的晶体溶液。然而,没有可靠的证据支持这一建议。事实上,近期实验、观察性和随机临床试验的结果表明,采用更严格的液体复苏方法可改善预后。越来越多的证据表明,积极的液体复苏是有害的。矛盾的是,过量给予液体可能会使休克恶化。在本综述中,我们批判性地评估了基于体重的液体复苏方法的科学证据。此外,还讨论了与液体复苏相关的危害的潜在机制和后果。最后,我们建议采用个体化、保守且以生理学为指导的液体复苏方法。