• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭合并脓毒症的生存预测:基于机器学习方法

Survival prediction for heart failure complicated by sepsis: based on machine learning methods.

作者信息

Zhang Qitian, Xu Lizhen, He Weibin, Lai Xinqi, Huang Xiaohong

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, Fujian, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 3;11:1410702. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1410702. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1410702
PMID:39421876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a cardiovascular disorder, while sepsis is a common non-cardiac cause of mortality. Patients with combined heart failure and sepsis have a significantly higher mortality rate and poor prognosis, making early identification of high-risk patients and appropriate allocation of medical resources critically important.

METHODS

We constructed a survival prediction model for patients with heart failure and sepsis using the eICU-CRD database and externally validated it using the MIMIC-IV database. Our primary outcome is the 28-day all-cause mortality rate. The Boruta method is used for initial feature selection, followed by feature ranking using the XGBoost algorithm. Four machine learning models were compared, including Logistic Regression (LR), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB). Model performance was assessed using metrics such as area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and the SHAP method was utilized to visualize feature importance and interpret model results. Additionally, we conducted external validation using the MIMIC-IV database.

RESULTS

We developed a survival prediction model for heart failure complicated by sepsis using data from 3891 patients in the eICU-CRD and validated it externally with 2928 patients from the MIMIC-IV database. The LR model outperformed all other machine learning algorithms with a validation set AUC of 0.746 (XGBoost: 0.726, AdaBoost: 0.744, GNB: 0.722), alongside accuracy (0.685), sensitivity (0.666), and specificity (0.712). The final model incorporates 10 features: age, ventilation, norepinephrine, white blood cell count, total bilirubin, temperature, phenylephrine, respiratory rate, neutrophil count, and systolic blood pressure. We employed the SHAP method to enhance the interpretability of the model based on the LR algorithm. Additionally, external validation was conducted using the MIMIC-IV database, with an external validation AUC of 0.699.

CONCLUSION

Based on the LR algorithm, a model was constructed to effectively predict the 28-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with heart failure complicated by sepsis. Utilizing our model predictions, clinicians can promptly identify high-risk patients and receive guidance for clinical practice.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭是一种心血管疾病,而脓毒症是常见的非心脏性死亡原因。合并心力衰竭和脓毒症的患者死亡率显著更高,预后较差,因此早期识别高危患者并合理分配医疗资源至关重要。

方法

我们使用eICU-CRD数据库构建了心力衰竭合并脓毒症患者的生存预测模型,并使用MIMIC-IV数据库进行外部验证。我们的主要结局是28天全因死亡率。使用Boruta方法进行初始特征选择,随后使用XGBoost算法进行特征排序。比较了四种机器学习模型,包括逻辑回归(LR)、极端梯度提升(XGBoost)、自适应提升(AdaBoost)和高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)。使用曲线下面积(AUC)、准确率、敏感性和特异性等指标评估模型性能,并利用SHAP方法可视化特征重要性并解释模型结果。此外,我们使用MIMIC-IV数据库进行了外部验证。

结果

我们使用eICU-CRD中3891例患者的数据开发了心力衰竭合并脓毒症的生存预测模型,并使用MIMIC-IV数据库中的2928例患者进行了外部验证。LR模型在验证集AUC方面优于所有其他机器学习算法,为0.746(XGBoost:0.726,AdaBoost:0.744,GNB:0.722),同时具有准确率(0.685)、敏感性(0.666)和特异性(0.712)。最终模型纳入了10个特征:年龄、通气、去甲肾上腺素、白细胞计数、总胆红素、体温、去氧肾上腺素、呼吸频率、中性粒细胞计数和收缩压。我们采用SHAP方法增强基于LR算法的模型的可解释性。此外,使用MIMIC-IV数据库进行了外部验证,外部验证AUC为0.699。

结论

基于LR算法构建了一个模型,可有效预测心力衰竭合并脓毒症患者的28天全因死亡率。利用我们的模型预测,临床医生可以及时识别高危患者并获得临床实践指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/ecae75b4b20b/fmed-11-1410702-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/94eb16be268e/fmed-11-1410702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/c66f9b5f3896/fmed-11-1410702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/ed9e58496665/fmed-11-1410702-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/ecae75b4b20b/fmed-11-1410702-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/94eb16be268e/fmed-11-1410702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/c66f9b5f3896/fmed-11-1410702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/ed9e58496665/fmed-11-1410702-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/223e/11484001/ecae75b4b20b/fmed-11-1410702-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival prediction for heart failure complicated by sepsis: based on machine learning methods.心力衰竭合并脓毒症的生存预测:基于机器学习方法
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 3;11:1410702. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1410702. eCollection 2024.
2
Interpretable machine learning for 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: A retrospective cohort study based on medical information mart for intensive care database-IV and eICU databases.用于预测心力衰竭合并高血压重症患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项基于重症监护医学信息集市数据库-IV和电子重症监护病房数据库的回顾性队列研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 12;9:994359. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.994359. eCollection 2022.
3
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
4
The prediction of in-hospital mortality in chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease using machine learning models.应用机器学习模型预测伴有冠状动脉疾病的慢性肾脏病患者的院内死亡率。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-00995-x.
5
Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.基于临床和炎症生物标志物的机器学习预测院内脓毒症死亡率:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 6;29(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01756-0.
6
Interpretable machine learning for predicting 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality for hypertensive ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients in the ICU: a multi-center retrospective cohort study with internal and external cross-validation.用于预测重症监护病房中高血压性缺血性或出血性中风患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项具有内部和外部交叉验证的多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 8;14:1185447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1185447. eCollection 2023.
7
Factor analysis based on SHapley Additive exPlanations for sepsis-associated encephalopathy in ICU mortality prediction using XGBoost - a retrospective study based on two large database.基于夏普利加性解释的因子分析在使用XGBoost预测ICU中脓毒症相关性脑病死亡率中的应用——一项基于两个大型数据库的回顾性研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 14;14:1290117. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1290117. eCollection 2023.
8
Prediction of 28-Day All-Cause Mortality in Heart Failure Patients with Clostridioides difficile Infection Using Machine Learning Models: Evidence from the MIMIC-IV Database.使用机器学习模型预测艰难梭菌感染心力衰竭患者的28天全因死亡率:来自MIMIC-IV数据库的证据
Cardiology. 2025;150(2):133-144. doi: 10.1159/000540994. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
9
Early Prediction of Cardiac Arrest in the Intensive Care Unit Using Explainable Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.使用可解释机器学习对重症监护病房中的心脏骤停进行早期预测:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 17;26:e62890. doi: 10.2196/62890.
10
Machine learning models for mortality prediction in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis-associated acute kidney injury.用于预测急性胰腺炎相关性急性肾损伤重症患者死亡率的机器学习模型
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Sep 11;17(10):sfae284. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae284. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between fluid balance and mortality for heart failure and sepsis: a propensity score-matching analysis.液体平衡与心力衰竭和脓毒症患者死亡率的关系:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 22;22(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01865-5.
2
Trends in bacterial sepsis incidence and mortality in France between 2015 and 2019 based on National Health Data System (Système National des données de Santé (SNDS)): a retrospective observational study.基于国家健康数据系统(Système National des données de Santé (SNDS))的 2015 年至 2019 年法国细菌脓毒症发病率和死亡率趋势:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 24;12(5):e058205. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058205.
3
Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality among Older Patients with Acute Heart Failure.
老年急性心力衰竭患者的临床特征及院内死亡预测因素
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 15;11(2):439. doi: 10.3390/jcm11020439.
4
Shock Severity Assessment in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients With Sepsis and Mixed Septic-Cardiogenic Shock.心脏重症监护病房中患有脓毒症及脓毒性-心源性混合性休克患者的休克严重程度评估
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2021 Dec 23;6(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.11.008. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Evidence-Based Management of Acute Heart Failure.急性心力衰竭的循证管理。
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Apr;37(4):621-631. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
6
Predicting 30-days mortality for MIMIC-III patients with sepsis-3: a machine learning approach using XGboost.利用 XGBoost 对 MIMIC-III 脓毒症-3 患者进行 30 天死亡率预测:机器学习方法。
J Transl Med. 2020 Dec 7;18(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02620-5.
7
Epidemiology of heart failure.心力衰竭的流行病学。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;22(8):1342-1356. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
8
Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax.脓毒症中的液体复苏:每千克30毫升的大骗局。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S37-S47. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.84.
9
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
10
Combining procalcitonin with the qSOFA and sepsis mortality prediction.将降钙素原与qSOFA及脓毒症死亡率预测相结合。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15981. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015981.