• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于切线图的角膜基质内环植入圆锥角膜的列线图评估:一年结果

Evaluation of a Tangential Map-Based Nomogram for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments' Implantation in Keratoconus: One Year Results.

作者信息

Zaky Adel Galal, KhalafAllah Mahmoud Tawfik, Sarhan Abdelrahman Elsebaey, Elsawy Moataz Faiz

机构信息

Menoufia Faculty of Medicine, Shebeen El-Kom, Egypt.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 19;2020:3983508. doi: 10.1155/2020/3983508. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1155/2020/3983508
PMID:32148940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7049859/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate a new tangential map-based nomogram versus the axial map-based nomogram for ICRS in keratoconus.

METHODS

A prospective case series study including 64 eyes of 64 patients who underwent ICRS implantation. Cone location was determined for each eye with two maps: the axial and the tangential. Appropriate ring selection was determined using two surgical nomograms: axial map-based and tangential map-based. Visual, refractive, and topographic outcomes were assessed before, as well as at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICRS implantation.

RESULTS

The cone location, and consequently the ring selection, was significantly different in the two nomograms with a "centralization tendency" in the tangential map. In the axial group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.12 ± 0.04 and 0.24 ± 0.08 to 0.28 ± 0.08 and 0.4 ± 0.1, respectively. Similarly, MRSE substantially decreased from -6.7 ± 3.3 to -1.2 ± 1.1 at 12 months after the procedure. In the tangential group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.09 ± 0.06 and 0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively. MRSE substantially decreased from -4.9 ± 1 at 12 months after the procedure. In the tangential group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.09 ± 0.06 and 0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively. MRSE substantially decreased from -4.9 ± 1 at 12 months after the procedure. In the tangential group, UDVA and CDVA improved from 0.09 ± 0.06 and 0.2 ± 0.1 to 0.5 ± 0.2 and 0.7 ± 0.2, respectively. MRSE substantially decreased from -4.9 ± 1=0.01 . Similarly, the gain in the CDVA was 0.4 and 0.15 in the tangential and axial groups, respectively, at 12 months, =0.01 . Similarly, the gain in the CDVA was 0.4 and 0.15 in the tangential and axial groups, respectively, at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The tangential map-based nomogram attained better visual and refractive outcomes at 1 year. In addition, the cone location was significantly different between both maps with a centralization tendency in the tangential one.

摘要

目的

评估一种新的基于切线图的列线图与基于轴向图的列线图在圆锥角膜中用于国际角膜屈光手术学会(ICRS)的情况。

方法

一项前瞻性病例系列研究,纳入64例接受ICRS植入术的患者的64只眼。使用轴向图和切线图确定每只眼的圆锥位置。使用两种手术列线图(基于轴向图和基于切线图)确定合适的环选择。在ICRS植入术前以及术后3个月、6个月和12个月评估视力、屈光和地形图结果。

结果

两种列线图中的圆锥位置以及因此的环选择存在显著差异,切线图有“集中趋势”。在轴向组中,最佳矫正远视力(UDVA)和矫正视力(CDVA)分别从0.12±0.04和0.24±0.08提高到0.28±0.08和0.4±0.1。同样,术后12个月时平均残余散光(MRSE)从-6.7±3.3大幅降至-1.2±1.1。在切线组中,UDVA和CDVA分别从0.09±0.06和0.2±0.1提高到0.5±0.2和0.7±0.2。术后12个月时MRSE从-4.9±1大幅下降。在切线组中,UDVA和CDVA分别从0.09±0.06和0.2±0.1提高到0.5±0.2和0.7±0.2。术后12个月时MRSE从-4.9±1大幅下降。在切线组中,UDVA和CDVA分别从0.09±0.06和0.2±0.1提高到0.5±0.2和0.7±0.2。术后12个月时MRSE从-4.9±1 = 0.01。同样地,术后12个月时切线组和轴向组的CDVA增益分别为0.4和0.15,= 0.01。同样地,术后12个月时切线组和轴向组的CDVA增益分别为0.4和0.15。

结论

基于切线图的列线图在1年时获得了更好的视力和屈光结果。此外,两张图之间的圆锥位置存在显著差异,切线图有集中趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/398ea9199846/JOPH2020-3983508.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/2e5a6e569819/JOPH2020-3983508.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/80118501f3cb/JOPH2020-3983508.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/f1bef59cddd2/JOPH2020-3983508.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/398ea9199846/JOPH2020-3983508.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/2e5a6e569819/JOPH2020-3983508.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/80118501f3cb/JOPH2020-3983508.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/f1bef59cddd2/JOPH2020-3983508.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c8/7049859/398ea9199846/JOPH2020-3983508.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Tangential Map-Based Nomogram for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments' Implantation in Keratoconus: One Year Results.基于切线图的角膜基质内环植入圆锥角膜的列线图评估:一年结果
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 19;2020:3983508. doi: 10.1155/2020/3983508. eCollection 2020.
2
Decision making nomogram for intrastromal corneal ring segments in keratoconus.圆锥角膜间质环段决策图
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jan;62(1):23-8. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.126170.
3
Predictors of Successful Outcome following Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation.基质内角膜环段植入术后成功结果的预测因素。
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Jul;44(7):707-715. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1594945. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
4
Comparison of Complication Rates between Manual and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Techniques for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Keratoconus.比较圆锥角膜患者行基质内角膜环片段植入术中手动与飞秒激光辅助技术的并发症发生率。
Curr Eye Res. 2019 Dec;44(12):1291-1298. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1635165. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
5
Inferior intrastromal corneal ring segments in paracentral keratoconus with no coincident topographic and coma axis.旁中心角膜层间环段植入术治疗非对称性角膜散光伴旁中心圆锥角膜
J Refract Surg. 2013 Apr;29(4):266-72. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-06.
6
Effects of Preoperative Topometric Indices on Visual Gain After Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation For Keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者角膜内环植入术前地形图指数对视觉增益的影响
Eye Contact Lens. 2018 Nov;44 Suppl 2:S387-S391. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000490.
7
Ferrara Rings for Visual Rehabilitation in Eyes with Keratoconus and Previous Cross-Linking Using the Ferrara Ring Nomogram.使用费拉拉环列线图为圆锥角膜及既往行交联手术的眼睛进行视觉康复的费拉拉环
Vision (Basel). 2021 Sep 29;5(4):45. doi: 10.3390/vision5040045.
8
Intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in paracentral keratoconus with coincident topographic and coma axis.基质内角膜环段植入术治疗旁中心角膜圆锥伴伴相应的地形和彗差光轴。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Sep;38(9):1576-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.031.
9
Simultaneous intratunnel cross-linking with intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation versus simultaneous epithelium-off cross-linking with intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus management.用于圆锥角膜治疗的隧道内交联联合基质内角膜环植入术与上皮去除交联联合基质内角膜环植入术的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 17;12:147-152. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S151313. eCollection 2018.
10
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following Intacs implantation in keratoconus eyes with central and eccentric cones.中央和偏心圆锥角膜 Intacs 植入术后的视觉和屈光结果比较。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug;47(4):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.04.001. Epub 2012 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel Q-value-based nomogram for single intracorneal ring segment implantation versus standard manufacturer's nomogram combined with accelerated cross-linking for treatment of keratoconus: a randomized controlled trial.一种基于 Q 值的新型单角膜环段植入术与标准制造商的角膜环段植入术联合加速交联治疗圆锥角膜的列线图:一项随机对照试验。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;99(4):e501-e511. doi: 10.1111/aos.14611. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

1
A Review of Structural and Biomechanical Changes in the Cornea in Aging, Disease, and Photochemical Crosslinking.衰老、疾病及光化学交联过程中角膜的结构与生物力学变化综述
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019 Mar 29;7:66. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00066. eCollection 2019.
2
Three-year follow-up of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation in central keratoconus with regular astigmatism: 'Bow-tie' shape.中央圆锥角膜合并规则散光患者基质内角膜环片植入的三年随访:“领结”形状
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;30(4):643-649. doi: 10.1177/1120672119835397. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Outcomes of a 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus: Results of a 6-month follow-up.
圆锥角膜320度基质内环植入术的疗效:6个月随访结果
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;30(1):139-146. doi: 10.1177/1120672118818018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
4
Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of 320°-Arc Length Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者植入320°弧长基质内角膜环片后的临床结果
Cornea. 2018 Oct;37(10):1299-1305. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001709.
5
Anterior Segment Changes After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Implantation of a 355-Degree Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment in Advanced Keratoconus.飞秒激光辅助植入355度基质内角膜环片段治疗重度圆锥角膜后的眼前节变化
Cornea. 2018 Nov;37(11):1438-1443. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001702.
6
Comparative study of 3 intracorneal implant types to manage central keratoconus.三种角膜内植入物治疗中央圆锥角膜的对比研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Mar;44(3):295-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Effect of Conus Eccentricity on Visual Outcomes After Intracorneal Ring Segments Implantation in Keratoconus.圆锥角膜患者角膜内环植入术后圆锥角膜偏心率对视觉效果的影响
J Refract Surg. 2018 Mar 1;34(3):196-200. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20180115-02.
8
Long-Term Follow-Up of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Paracentral Keratoconus with Coincident Corneal Keratometric, Comatic, and Refractive Axes: Stability of the Procedure.旁中心圆锥角膜合并角膜角膜曲率计、慧差和屈光轴的基质内角膜环片长期随访:手术稳定性
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:4058026. doi: 10.1155/2017/4058026. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
9
Long-Term Follow-up of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments (210-Degree Arc Length) in Central Keratoconus With High Corneal Asphericity.中央圆锥角膜伴高角膜非球面性患者角膜基质内环植入术(210度弧长)的长期随访
Cornea. 2017 Nov;36(11):1325-1330. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001339.
10
Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in 409 Paracentral Keratoconic Eyes.
Cornea. 2016 Nov;35(11):1421-1426. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000978.