• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者安全优于权力层级:医疗保健专业人员报告技能培训的范围综述。

Patient Safety Over Power Hierarchy: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Professionals' Speaking-up Skills Training.

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2020 Sep/Oct;42(5):249-263. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000257.

DOI:10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000257
PMID:32149868
Abstract

Communication failures in healthcare constitute a major root cause of adverse events and medical errors. Considerable evidence links failures to raise concerns about patient harm in a timely manner with errors in medication administration, hygiene and isolation, treatment decisions, or invasive procedures. Expressing one's concern while navigating the power hierarchy requires formal training that targets both the speaker's emotional and verbal skills and the receiver's listening skills. We conducted a scoping review to examine the scope and components of training programs that targeted healthcare professionals' speaking-up skills. Out of 9,627 screened studies, 14 studies published between 2005 and 2018 met the inclusion criteria. The majority of the existing training exclusively relied on one-time training, mostly in simulation settings, involving subjects from the same profession. In addition, most studies implicitly referred to positional power as defined by titles; few addressed other forms of power such as personal resources (e.g., expertise, information). Almost none addressed the emotional and psychological dimensions of speaking up. The existing literature provides limited evidence identifying effective training components that positively affect speaking-up behaviors and attitudes. Future opportunities include examining the role of healthcare professionals' conflict engagement style or leaders' behaviors as factors that promote speaking-up behaviors.

摘要

医疗保健中的沟通失败是不良事件和医疗差错的主要根本原因。大量证据表明,未能及时提出对患者伤害的担忧与药物管理、卫生和隔离、治疗决策或侵入性程序中的错误有关。在驾驭权力层级结构时表达关注需要针对演讲者的情感和语言技能以及接收者的听力技能进行正式培训。我们进行了范围审查,以检查针对医疗保健专业人员发言技巧的培训计划的范围和组成部分。在 9627 项筛选研究中,有 14 项发表于 2005 年至 2018 年的研究符合纳入标准。现有的大多数培训仅依赖于一次性培训,主要在模拟环境中,涉及来自同一专业的受试者。此外,大多数研究都隐含地将职位权力定义为职称;很少涉及其他形式的权力,如个人资源(如专业知识、信息)。几乎没有人涉及发言的情感和心理维度。现有文献提供的证据有限,无法确定有效培训内容,以积极影响发言行为和态度。未来的机会包括研究医疗保健专业人员的冲突参与风格或领导者行为作为促进发言行为的因素。

相似文献

1
Patient Safety Over Power Hierarchy: A Scoping Review of Healthcare Professionals' Speaking-up Skills Training.患者安全优于权力层级:医疗保健专业人员报告技能培训的范围综述。
J Healthc Qual. 2020 Sep/Oct;42(5):249-263. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000257.
2
The FIRST Curriculum: Cultivating Speaking Up Behaviors in the Clinical Learning Environment.首个课程:在临床学习环境中培养敢于发声的行为。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2019 Aug 1;50(8):355-361. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20190717-06.
3
Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review.医院医护人员为患者安全发声:文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb 8;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-61.
4
Improving safety through speaking up: An ethical and financial imperative.通过直言不讳提高安全性:一项道德和财务上的必要举措。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2019 Jul;39(1):19-27. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21360. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
5
Speaking up about hand hygiene failures: A vignette survey study among healthcare professionals.关于手卫生失败的直言不讳:一项针对医护专业人员的案例调查研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Aug;46(8):870-875. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
6
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the French version of the TeamSTEPPS teamwork perceptions questionnaire.跨文化验证和心理计量测试法语版的团队 STEPPS 团队工作感知问卷。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Aug 29;38(6):923-941. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2023-0004.
7
Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes and skills regarding patient safety: a systematic literature review.医疗保健专业人员关于患者安全的知识、态度和技能:一项系统的文献综述。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Mar;29(1):30-50. doi: 10.1111/scs.12136. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
Defining Speaking Up in the Healthcare System: a Systematic Review.定义医疗体系中的发声行为:系统综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(15):3406-3413. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08322-0. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
9
Health care professionals' skills regarding patient safety.医疗保健专业人员在患者安全方面的技能。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2016;52(4):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
10
The potential of a self-assessment tool to identify healthcare professionals' strengths and areas in need of professional development to aid effective facilitation of group-based, person-centered diabetes education.自我评估工具在确定医疗保健专业人员的优势和需要专业发展的领域方面的潜力,以帮助有效地促进基于群体的、以患者为中心的糖尿病教育。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1003-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowerment of nurses in qatar: unveiling the relationship between self-esteem, psychological empowerment, and assertiveness.卡塔尔护士的赋权:揭示自尊、心理赋权与自信之间的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 21;24(1):948. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03428-8.
2
Developing a model for clinical teaching with emotional intelligence.构建一个具有情商的临床教学模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06349-3.
3
A multi-institution longitudinal randomised control trial of speaking up: Implications for theory and practice.
一项关于直言不讳的多机构纵向随机对照试验:对理论与实践的启示
Can J Respir Ther. 2024 Oct 23;60:152-163. doi: 10.29390/001c.124914. eCollection 2024.
4
Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training.改变对话方式:旨在优化基于模拟的团队培训跨专业促进作用的指南的影响
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Oct 12;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00313-3.
5
Is the Calgary-Cambridge Model of consultation a suitable communication tool for students and newly qualified paramedics? A qualitative study.卡尔加里-剑桥咨询模式对学生和新获得资格的护理人员来说是一种合适的沟通工具吗?一项定性研究。
Br Paramed J. 2024 Jun 1;9(1):23-33. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.23.
6
Behavioral sciences applied to acute care teams: a research agenda for the years ahead by a European research network.行为科学在急症护理团队中的应用:一个欧洲研究网络的未来研究议程。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 13;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10555-6.
7
Development and validity evidence for the intraprofessional conflict exercise: An assessment tool to support collaboration.跨专业冲突演练的开发与有效性证据:一种支持协作的评估工具。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 17;18(2):e0280564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280564. eCollection 2023.
8
The influence of professional identity on how the receiver receives and responds to a speaking up message: a cross-sectional study.职业身份对信息接收者如何接收并回应直言信息的影响:一项横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 30;22(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01178-z.
9
Speaking up about patient safety concerns: view of nursing students.护士学生对患者安全问题的看法:直言不讳。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):1547. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08935-x.
10
Speaking up as an extension of socio-cultural dynamics in hospital settings: a study of staff experiences of speaking up across seven hospitals.在医院环境中发声是社会文化动态的一种延伸:一项对七个医院工作人员发声经历的研究。
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Nov 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):245-71. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2022-0129.