MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 May 1;174(5):437-445. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6317.
Twin pregnancies account for 3% of live births but experience substantially more perinatal morbidity and mortality than singleton pregnancies. Optimizing the timing of birth is a key strategy in improving twin pregnancy outcomes. Current UK and US policies are based on observational studies of perinatal mortality and not on longer-term effects. The association of timing of birth with long-term childhood outcomes among twins is uncertain.
To identify the optimal gestation week for birth of twin infants by calculating the week of birth associated with the lowest risk of short-term and long-term adverse outcomes (perinatal mortality and special educational need [SEN] at school).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based, data-linkage cohort study included 43 133 twin infants born at a gestational age of 34 weeks onward between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2015, in Scotland. The data were analyzed from June 1, 2017, to March 1, 2019.
Gestational age (in weeks) at the time of birth.
The primary outcomes were extended perinatal mortality and a record of SEN (≥1 of intellectual disabilities, dyslexia, physical or motor impairment, language or speech disorder, autistic spectrum disorder, and social, emotional, or behavioral difficulties) at school (children aged 4-18 years). To infer the consequence of the gestational age at birth, clinical outcomes of twin infants born at each week of gestation from 34 weeks onward were compared with those of twin infants remaining in utero thereafter.
Of the total 43 133 twin infants included in the study, 21 696 (50.3%) were females. Although maternity records were available for all infants, 9519 sex-discordant twin children were linked to their educational data, of whom 1069 (13.8%) had a record of SEN. Compared with twins remaining in utero (n = 26 172), birth at any gestational age from 34 to 37 weeks was associated with increased odds of perinatal death (ie, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.53-2.69 at 36 weeks [n = 8056]) and increased risk of SEN at school (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-1.74, for birth at 36 weeks compared with 37 weeks). In a competing risk analysis, the risks of stillbirth and neonatal death were balanced at 37 weeks (risk difference, 2.05; 95% CI, 0.8-3.3).
The findings of this study suggest that, in the absence of a medical complication, twins should not be routinely delivered before 37 completed weeks of gestation. These findings may help optimize shared decision-making around the timing of twin birth.
双胞胎妊娠占活产儿的 3%,但与单胎妊娠相比,围产期发病率和死亡率要高得多。优化分娩时机是改善双胞胎妊娠结局的关键策略。目前英国和美国的政策是基于围产儿死亡率的观察性研究,而不是基于长期影响。出生时间与双胞胎儿童长期结局之间的关联尚不确定。
通过计算出生时风险最低的周数,确定双胎婴儿的最佳分娩孕周,以评估短期和长期不良结局(围产儿死亡率和特殊教育需求[特殊教育需求])。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究为基于人群的、数据链接队列研究,纳入了 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间在苏格兰出生、胎龄 34 周及以上的 43133 例双胎婴儿。数据于 2017 年 6 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 1 日进行分析。
出生时的胎龄(周)。
主要结局为延长围产儿死亡率和在校期间(4-18 岁儿童)有特殊教育需求(智力残疾、阅读障碍、身体或运动障碍、语言或言语障碍、自闭症谱系障碍以及社会、情感或行为困难)的记录。为了推断出生时胎龄的后果,将 34 周后出生的每一周胎龄的双胎婴儿的临床结局与此后仍在子宫内的双胎婴儿的临床结局进行比较。
在纳入的 43133 例双胎婴儿中,21696 例(50.3%)为女性。尽管所有婴儿的产妇记录均可获得,但 9519 例性别不一致的双胎儿童的教育数据被链接,其中 1069 例(13.8%)有特殊教育需求的记录。与仍在子宫内的双胞胎(n=26172)相比,34 至 37 周之间任何胎龄的分娩都与围产儿死亡的几率增加有关(即,36 周时的调整比值比[OR]为 1.99;95%置信区间[CI]为 1.53-2.69),并且在校期间发生特殊教育需求的风险增加(36 周时的 OR 为 1.39;95%CI 为 1.11-1.74,与 37 周相比)。在竞争风险分析中,37 周时死产和新生儿死亡的风险是平衡的(风险差为 2.05;95%CI 为 0.8-3.3)。
本研究结果表明,在没有医疗并发症的情况下,双胎妊娠不应该常规在 37 周前分娩。这些发现可能有助于优化双胎分娩时机的决策。