Knight Hannah E, Cromwell David A, Gurol-Urganci Ipek, Harron Katie, van der Meulen Jan H, Smith Gordon C S
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2017 Nov 14;14(11):e1002425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002425. eCollection 2017 Nov.
A recent randomised controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that induction of labour at 39 weeks of gestational age has no short-term adverse effect on the mother or infant among nulliparous women aged ≥35 years. However, the trial was underpowered to address the effect of routine induction of labour on the risk of perinatal death. We aimed to determine the association between induction of labour at ≥39 weeks and the risk of perinatal mortality among nulliparous women aged ≥35 years.
We used English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data collected between April 2009 and March 2014 to compare perinatal mortality between induction of labour at 39, 40, and 41 weeks of gestation and expectant management (continuation of pregnancy to either spontaneous labour, induction of labour, or caesarean section at a later gestation). Analysis was by multivariable Poisson regression with adjustment for maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related conditions. Among the cohort of 77,327 nulliparous women aged 35 to 50 years delivering a singleton infant, 33.1% had labour induced: these women tended to be older and more likely to have medical complications of pregnancy, and the infants were more likely to be small for gestational age. Induction of labour at 40 weeks (compared with expectant management) was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital perinatal death (0.08% versus 0.26%; adjusted risk ratio [adjRR] 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.80, P = 0.015) and meconium aspiration syndrome (0.44% versus 0.86%; adjRR 0.52; 95% CI 0.35-0.78, P = 0.002). Induction at 40 weeks was also associated with a slightly increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (adjRR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 0.020) and emergency caesarean section (adjRR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09, P = 0.019). The number needed to treat (NNT) analysis indicated that 562 (95% CI 366-1,210) inductions of labour at 40 weeks would be required to prevent 1 perinatal death. Limitations of the study include the reliance on observational data in which gestational age is recorded in weeks rather than days. There is also the potential for unmeasured confounders and under-recording of induction of labour or perinatal death in the dataset.
Bringing forward the routine offer of induction of labour from the current recommendation of 41-42 weeks to 40 weeks of gestation in nulliparous women aged ≥35 years may reduce overall rates of perinatal death.
最近一项随机对照试验(RCT)表明,对于年龄≥35岁的初产妇,孕39周引产对母亲或婴儿没有短期不良影响。然而,该试验的样本量不足以探讨常规引产对围产期死亡风险的影响。我们旨在确定孕≥39周引产与年龄≥35岁初产妇围产期死亡风险之间的关联。
我们使用了2009年4月至2014年3月期间收集的英国医院事件统计(HES)数据,比较孕39、40和41周引产与期待管理(继续妊娠至自然分娩、引产或后期剖宫产)的围产期死亡率。分析采用多变量泊松回归,并对产妇特征和妊娠相关情况进行了调整。在77327名年龄在35至50岁之间、分娩单胎婴儿的初产妇队列中,33.1%的产妇接受了引产:这些产妇往往年龄较大,更有可能患有妊娠并发症,其婴儿更有可能小于胎龄。孕40周引产(与期待管理相比)与较低的院内围产期死亡风险相关(0.08%对0.26%;调整风险比[adjRR]0.33;95%CI 0.13 - 0.80,P = 0.015)和胎粪吸入综合征风险相关(0.44%对0.86%;adjRR 0.52;95%CI 0.35 - 0.78,P = 0.002)。孕40周引产还与器械助产阴道分娩风险略有增加相关(adjRR 1.06;95%CI 1.01 - 1.11,P = 0.020)和急诊剖宫产风险相关(adjRR 1.05;95%CI 1.01 - 1.09,P = 0.019)。治疗所需人数(NNT)分析表明,孕40周引产562例(95%CI 366 - 1210)可预防1例围产期死亡。该研究的局限性包括依赖观察性数据,其中孕周按周而非天记录。数据集中还存在未测量的混杂因素以及引产或围产期死亡记录不完整的可能性。
对于年龄≥35岁的初产妇,将常规引产的孕周从目前推荐的41 - 42周提前至40周可能会降低总体围产期死亡率。