National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Department of Engineering Technology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 May;17(5):243-252. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1726933. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Firefighting is physically and mentally strenuous, requiring rapid, appropriate decision-making in hot environments. Intact cognitive function is imperative to firefighters' effectiveness and safety. The study purpose was to investigate the effect of hyperthermia and the effect of body cooling on sustained attention and response inhibition while wearing firefighters' personal protective ensembles after exercise in a hot environment. Twelve healthy males were recruited to participate in two randomly assigned exercise sessions (walking on a treadmill for 40 min at 40% [Formula: see text] O while wearing firefighter's protective ensemble) in a hot environment: control (no cooling) and intervention (cooling). For intervention sessions, a cooling garment was worn underneath firefighter's protective ensemble and infused with 18 °C water supplied by an external water circulator. Participants performed a computerized Go/No-Go (a measure of cognitive function) test three times at baseline and post-exercise for each experimental session. Participants completed baseline testing while wearing cotton athletic clothing. The exercise continued until the core temperature reached ∼39 °C (for all subjects regardless of cooling or non-cooling experimental sessions). Following hyperthermia, participants' physiological responses were significantly increased after exercise. Subjects' reaction time was significantly reduced (improved) after experiencing thermal strain and reaching hyperthermia. The cooling method had a significant impact on suppressing the physiological load, i.e., body cooling delayed the time to reach a T of 39 °C (p ≤ 0.05), but not cognitive inhibition and attention (reaction time and accuracy). Unexpectedly, hyperthermia resulted in shorter reaction time following exercise (16.64 ± 5.62; p < 0.03), likely influenced by increased attention/vigilance. Hyperthermia may trigger an acute increase in alertness, causing decreased reaction time.
消防工作需要体力和精神上的高度紧张,在炎热的环境中需要快速、适当的决策。完整的认知功能对消防员的效率和安全至关重要。本研究旨在探讨热应激和身体冷却对穿着消防个人防护装备在热环境中运动后持续注意力和反应抑制的影响。
12 名健康男性被招募参加两项随机分配的运动试验(在热环境中穿着消防防护服以 40%的[Formula: see text]O 速度在跑步机上行走 40 分钟):对照组(不冷却)和干预组(冷却)。干预组穿着冷却服,并用外部水循环器提供的 18°C 水进行冷却。参与者在每个实验阶段的基线和运动后三次进行计算机化 Go/No-Go(认知功能的一种测量方法)测试。参与者在穿着棉质运动服装时完成基线测试。
无论是否进行冷却实验,运动持续进行,直到核心体温达到约 39°C(所有受试者)。在经历热应激和达到高温后,参与者的生理反应明显增加。与热应激前相比,运动后反应时间显著缩短(改善)。冷却方法对抑制生理负荷有显著影响,即身体冷却延迟了达到 39°C 的时间(p≤0.05),但对认知抑制和注意力(反应时间和准确性)没有影响。
令人意外的是,运动后高温会导致反应时间缩短(16.64±5.62;p<0.03),这可能与注意力/警觉性提高有关。高温可能会引发警觉性的急性增加,导致反应时间缩短。