• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高强度间歇训练自我效能问卷的编制与评价

Development and Evaluation of the High-Intensity Interval Training Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.

作者信息

Eather Narelle, Beauchamp Mark R, Rhodes Ryan E, Diallo Thierno M O, Smith Jordan J, Jung Mary E, Plotnikoff Ronald C, Noetel Michael, Harris Nigel, Graham Emily, Lubans David R

机构信息

University of Newcastle.

University of British Columbia.

出版信息

J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020 Mar 9;42(2):114-122. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2019-0166. Print 2020 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1123/jsep.2019-0166
PMID:32150720
Abstract

This study involved the design and evaluation of the High-Intensity Interval Training Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (HIIT-SQ). Phase 1: Questionnaire items were developed. Phase 2: Australian adolescents (N = 389, 16.0 ± 0.4 years, 41.10% female) completed the HIIT-SQ, and factorial validity of the measurement model was explored. Phase 3: Adolescents (N = 100, age 12-14 years, 44% female) completed the HIIT-SQ twice (1 week apart) to evaluate test-retest reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis of the final six items (mean = 3.43-6.73, SD = 0.99-25.30) revealed adequate fit, χ2(21) = 21, p = .01, comparative fit index = .99, Tucker-Lewis index = .99, root mean square of approximation = .07, 90% confidence interval [.04, .11]. Factor loading estimates showed that all items were highly related to the factor (estimates range: 0.81-0.90). Intraclass coefficients and typical error values were .99 (95% confidence interval [.99, 1.00]) and .22, respectively. This study provides preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of scores derived from the HIIT-SQ in adolescents.

摘要

本研究涉及高强度间歇训练自我效能量表(HIIT-SQ)的设计与评估。第一阶段:编制问卷项目。第二阶段:澳大利亚青少年(N = 389,16.0±0.4岁,41.10%为女性)完成HIIT-SQ,并探索测量模型的因子效度。第三阶段:青少年(N = 100,年龄12 - 14岁,44%为女性)两次完成HIIT-SQ(间隔1周)以评估重测信度。对最终的六个项目(均值 = 3.43 - 6.73,标准差 = 0.99 - 25.30)进行验证性因素分析,结果显示拟合良好,χ2(21) = 21,p = .01,比较拟合指数 = .99,塔克 - 刘易斯指数 = .99,近似均方根 = .07,90%置信区间[.04, .11]。因子载荷估计表明所有项目与该因子高度相关(估计范围:0.81 - 0.90)。组内相关系数和典型误差值分别为.99(95%置信区间[.99, 1.00])和.22。本研究为HIIT-SQ在青少年中得分的效度和信度提供了初步证据。

相似文献

1
Development and Evaluation of the High-Intensity Interval Training Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.高强度间歇训练自我效能问卷的编制与评价
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020 Mar 9;42(2):114-122. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2019-0166. Print 2020 Apr 1.
2
Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0.冠心病自我护理量表3.0版的心理测量测试。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022 Oct 24. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000952.
3
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Does Not Have Adequate Structural Validity for Use With Young, Active Patients With ACL Tears.膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分在用于 ACL 撕裂的年轻、活跃患者时,其结构效度不足。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jul 1;480(7):1342-1350. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002158. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Development and evaluation of the Motivation to Limit Screen-time Questionnaire (MLSQ) for adolescents.青少年限制屏幕时间动机问卷(MLSQ)的编制与评估。
Prev Med. 2013 Nov;57(5):561-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.023. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
Psychometric Properties and Factorial Structure of Vietnamese Version of the Hypertension Self-care Profile Behavior Scale.高血压自我护理行为量表越南文版的心理测量学特性和因子结构。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(5):446-453. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000770.
6
Development and Validation of an Instrument Measuring Self-Care in Persons With a Fecal Ostomy.粪造口患者自我护理测量工具的开发与验证
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;45(4):335-340. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000444.
7
Adaptation of the Food Literacy Questionnaire for school children to Turkish: validity and reliability study.儿童食物素养问卷的土耳其语适应性改编:信度和效度研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3307-3316. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05010-3. Epub 2023 May 11.
8
Development and psychometric testing of a Learning Behaviour Questionnaire among Chinese undergraduate nursing students.开发并检验中文版本科护生学习行为问卷的信效度。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 14;11(6):e043711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043711.
9
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale.《护理职业自我效能量表》韩文版的心理测量学特性。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Feb 21;30(2):e197. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000481.

引用本文的文献

1
The Development and Evaluation of Netball-Specific High-Intensity Interval Training Sessions: The Netball-HIIT Study.无挡板篮球专项高强度间歇训练课程的开发与评估:无挡板篮球-HIIT研究
Sports (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;12(1):34. doi: 10.3390/sports12010034.
2
Evaluating the feasibility and efficacy of a home-based combined high intensity interval and moderate intensity training program for increasing physical activity among low-active adults: A randomized pilot trial.评估基于家庭的高强度间歇和中等强度训练相结合的方案在提高低活跃成年人身体活动中的可行性和效果:一项随机试点试验。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 21;18(2):e0281985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281985. eCollection 2023.
3
Time-efficient physical activity intervention for older adolescents with disability: rationale and study protocol for the Burn 2 Learn adapted (B2La) cluster randomised controlled trial.
针对残疾青少年的高效体力活动干预:Burn 2 Learn 适应性(B2La)群组随机对照试验的基本原理和研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 10;12(8):e065321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065321.
4
Time-efficient intervention to improve older adolescents' cardiorespiratory fitness: findings from the 'Burn 2 Learn' cluster randomised controlled trial.提高大龄青少年心肺适能的高效干预措施:“燃烧学习”整群随机对照试验的结果
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec 21;55(13):751-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-103277.
5
Process Evaluation of a School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Program for Older Adolescents: The Burn 2 Learn Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.一项针对青少年的校内高强度间歇训练计划的过程评估:“燃烧2学习”整群随机对照试验
Children (Basel). 2020 Dec 16;7(12):299. doi: 10.3390/children7120299.