• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《护理职业自我效能量表》韩文版的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale.

机构信息

MS, RN, Researcher, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.

PhD, RN, Associate Professor, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Nurs Res. 2022 Feb 21;30(2):e197. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000481.

DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000481
PMID:35323133
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-efficacy in the nursing profession has been reported to have a positive effect on personal performance in terms of clinical performance and decision-making abilities, nursing performance, professional intuition, organizational commitment, and turnover intention.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale (K-NPSES).

METHODS

This methodological study used questionnaires collected from 307 nurses at medical institutions in South Korea. The content validity of the questionnaire was verified using the averaging method, whereas the criterion-related validity was evaluated by calculating the correlation with the Sherer General Self-Efficacy Scale. The construct validity was determined by analyzing the explanatory and confirmatory factors. Reliability was verified using Cronbach's α and test-retest by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The content validity index of the K-NPSES was found to be greater than .95, and the criterion-related validity was satisfactory (coefficient = .57, p < .001). The original Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale has two subfactors, and the K-NPSES analyzed in this study has four subfactors. The data were appropriate for factor analysis using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (.87) and Bartlett's sphericity test (χ2 = 1236.01, df = 137, p < .001). The model fit was acceptable (normed chi-square [χ2/df] = 2.22, root mean square residual = .05, root mean square error of approximation = .09, comparative fit index = .88, Tucker-Lewis index = .86, goodness-of-fit index = .83). Regarding reliability, Cronbach's α was .91 and the intraclass correlation coefficient was .78 (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings of this study confirmed the K-NPSES as having acceptable validity. In addition to predicting nursing clinical performance, a well-established nursing profession self-efficacy scale may be used to improve the quality of clinical nursing.

摘要

背景

自我效能感在护理专业中被报道对个人表现具有积极影响,包括临床表现和决策能力、护理绩效、专业直觉、组织承诺和离职意向。

目的

本研究旨在验证韩国版护理职业自我效能量表(K-NPSES)的效度和信度。

方法

本方法学研究使用问卷收集了韩国医疗机构的 307 名护士的数据。使用平均法验证问卷的内容效度,通过计算与 Sherer 一般自我效能感量表的相关性来评估效标关联效度。通过分析解释和验证性因素来确定构念效度。使用 Cronbach's α 和计算组内相关系数的重测信度来验证信度。

结果

K-NPSES 的内容效度指数大于.95,效标关联效度令人满意(系数=.57,p <.001)。原始护理职业自我效能量表有两个亚因素,本研究分析的 K-NPSES 有四个亚因素。数据适合使用 Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(.87)和 Bartlett 球形检验(χ2 = 1236.01,df = 137,p <.001)进行因子分析。模型拟合可接受(标准化卡方比 [χ2/df] = 2.22,均方根残差 =.05,近似均方误差 =.09,比较拟合指数 =.88,Tucker-Lewis 指数 =.86,拟合优度指数 =.83)。关于信度,Cronbach's α 为.91,组内相关系数为.78(p <.001)。

结论/对实践的启示:本研究结果证实了 K-NPSES 具有可接受的效度。除了预测护理临床绩效外,一个成熟的护理职业自我效能量表还可以用于提高临床护理质量。

相似文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale.《护理职业自我效能量表》韩文版的心理测量学特性。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Feb 21;30(2):e197. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000481.
2
[Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Self-Efficacy for HIV Disease Management Skills].[《韩国版艾滋病疾病管理技能自我效能感量表的心理测量学特性》]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2023 Jun;53(3):295-308. doi: 10.4040/jkan.23016.
3
Validation of the Korean version of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire in clinical clerkship of Korean medical students.验证韩国版反思实践问卷在韩国医学生临床实习中的应用。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Jun;35(2):153-163. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.256. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
4
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale.《整体护理能力量表韩国版的有效性和可靠性》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127244.
5
Psychometric Properties of the Albanian Version of the Nursing Self-Efficacy Scale.阿尔巴尼亚语版护理自我效能量表的心理测量学特性
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;10(11):2232. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10112232.
6
Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the ConCom Safety Management Scale.韩文版ConCom安全管理量表的效度与信度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 27;18(23):12514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312514.
7
Psychometric Properties and Factorial Structure of Vietnamese Version of the Hypertension Self-care Profile Behavior Scale.高血压自我护理行为量表越南文版的心理测量学特性和因子结构。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(5):446-453. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000770.
8
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the persian version of the "Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale".《护理专业自我效能量表》波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量学评估
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 25;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01182-3.
9
Turkish Validity-Reliability Study of the Celiac Disease-Specific Pediatric Quality of Life Scale.中文版特发性门脉高压症患者生活质量量表的信度和效度研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar;33(3):248-256. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.21242.
10
Translations and psychometric validation of the Korean version of the Nursing Teamwork Survey.《护理团队协作调查问卷》韩文版的翻译及心理测量学验证
Res Nurs Health. 2023 Apr;46(2):242-250. doi: 10.1002/nur.22297. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the relationship between nurses' professional self-efficacy and parents' perception of family-centered care.探究护士的职业自我效能感与家长对以家庭为中心护理的认知之间的关系。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 2;24(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03112-x.
2
Impact of narrative nursing cognition, self-efficacy, and social support on the practices of registered nurses in China: a structural equation modeling analysis.叙事护理认知、自我效能感和社会支持对中国注册护士实践的影响:一项结构方程模型分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 5;23(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02292-2.
3
An Observational Cross-Sectional Study on the Correlation between Professional Competencies and Self-Efficacy in Albanian Registered Nurses.
阿尔巴尼亚注册护士专业能力与自我效能感相关性的横断面观察研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 28;11(15):2156. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152156.
4
Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale-Version 2: A Stepwise Validation with Three Cross-Sectional Data Collections.护理专业自我效能量表-第2版:基于三次横断面数据收集的逐步验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;11(5):754. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050754.