Sehlbach Carolin, Teunissen Pim W, Driessen Erik W, Mitchell Sharon, Rohde Gernot G U, Smeenk Frank W J M, Govaerts Marjan J B
Department of Educational Development and Research, School of Health Professions Education, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Med Educ. 2020 Sep;54(9):811-820. doi: 10.1111/medu.14148. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
We expect physicians to be lifelong learners. Participation in clinical practice is an important potential source of that learning. To support physicians in this process, a better understanding of how they learn in clinical practice is necessary. This study investigates how physicians recognise and use informal feedback from interactions with patients in outpatient settings as learning cues to adjust their communication behaviours in daily practice.
To understand physicians' use of informal feedback, we combined non-participant observations with semi-structured interviews. We enrolled 10 respiratory physicians and observed 100 physician-patient interactions at two teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Data collection and analysis were performed iteratively according to the principles of constructivist grounded theory.
Following stages of open, axial and selective coding, we were able to conceptualise how physicians use cues to reflect on and adjust their communication. In addition to vast variations within and across patient encounters, we observed recurring adjustments in physicians' communication behaviours in response to specific informal feedback cues. Physicians recognised and used these cues to self-monitor communication performance. They had established 'communication repertoires' based on multiple patient interactions, which many saw as learning opportunities contributing to the development of expertise. Our findings, however, show differences in physicians' individual levels of sensitivity in recognising and using learning opportunities in daily practice, which were further influenced by contextual, personal and interpersonal factors. Whereas some described themselves as having little inclination to change, others used critical incidents to fine-tune their communication repertoires, and yet others constantly reshaped them, seeking learning opportunities in their daily work.
There is large variation in how physicians use learning cues from daily practice. To enhance learning in and from daily practice, we propose turning workplace learning into a collaborative effort with the aim of increasing awareness and the use of informal performance-relevant feedback.
我们期望医生成为终身学习者。参与临床实践是这种学习的一个重要潜在来源。为了在这一过程中支持医生,有必要更好地了解他们在临床实践中的学习方式。本研究调查医生如何识别和利用门诊环境中与患者互动的非正式反馈作为学习线索,以在日常实践中调整他们的沟通行为。
为了解医生对非正式反馈的利用情况,我们将非参与性观察与半结构化访谈相结合。我们招募了10名呼吸科医生,并在荷兰的两家教学医院观察了100次医患互动。数据收集和分析根据建构主义扎根理论的原则迭代进行。
经过开放式、轴心式和选择性编码阶段,我们能够概念化医生如何利用线索来反思和调整他们的沟通。除了在患者就诊过程中和不同患者就诊之间存在巨大差异外,我们还观察到医生的沟通行为会因特定的非正式反馈线索而反复调整。医生识别并利用这些线索来自我监控沟通表现。他们基于多次患者互动建立了“沟通方式库”,许多人将其视为有助于专业技能发展的学习机会。然而,我们的研究结果表明,医生在日常实践中识别和利用学习机会的个人敏感度存在差异,这还受到情境、个人和人际因素的进一步影响。一些人表示自己几乎没有改变的倾向,另一些人利用关键事件来微调他们的沟通方式库,还有一些人不断重塑这些方式库,在日常工作中寻找学习机会。
医生利用日常实践中的学习线索的方式存在很大差异。为了加强日常实践中的学习以及从日常实践中学习,我们建议将工作场所学习转变为一项协作努力,目的是提高对与绩效相关的非正式反馈的认识和利用。