• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of an Interactive Website to Engage Patients in Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Settings.互动网站对参与门诊环境下预先护理计划患者的影响。
Ann Fam Med. 2020 Mar;18(2):110-117. doi: 10.1370/afm.2471.
2
The advance care planning PREPARE study among older Veterans with serious and chronic illness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对患有严重慢性病的老年退伍军人的预先护理计划PREPARE研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2015 Dec 12;16:570. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1055-9.
3
A novel website to prepare diverse older adults for decision making and advance care planning: a pilot study.一个帮助不同老年人群体进行决策和预先护理计划准备的新型网站:一项试点研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Apr;47(4):674-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.05.023. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
4
Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study.测量预先医疗照护计划的参与度:一项跨中心的可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010375.
5
Effect of "Speak Up" educational tools to engage patients in advance care planning in outpatient healthcare settings: A prospective before-after study.“畅所欲言”教育工具对促进门诊医疗环境中患者参与预先医疗计划的效果:一项前瞻性前后研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Apr;104(4):709-714. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.028. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
6
Improving a Full Range of Advance Care Planning Behavior Change and Action Domains: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.改善全方位的预先医疗照护计划行为改变和行动领域:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):575-581.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
7
Empowering Older Adults to Discuss Advance Care Planning During Clinical Visits: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.赋权老年人在临床就诊期间讨论预立医疗照护计划:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jun;68(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16405. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
8
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
9
Development and validation of a questionnaire to detect behavior change in multiple advance care planning behaviors.开发并验证了一个问卷,以检测多种预先医疗照护计划行为中的行为变化。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 5;8(9):e72465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072465. eCollection 2013.
10
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncovering Specific Navigation Patterns by Assessing User Engagement of People With Dementia and Family Caregivers With an Advance Care Planning Website: Quantitative Analysis of Web Log Data.通过评估痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者对预立医疗计划网站的用户参与度来揭示特定的导航模式:网络日志数据的定量分析
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 11;8:e60652. doi: 10.2196/60652.
2
Compassionate engagement of communities in support of palliative and end-of-life care: challenges in post-pandemic era.社区在支持姑息治疗和临终关怀方面的富有同情心的参与:大流行后时代的挑战。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 18;11:1489299. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1489299. eCollection 2024.
3
Effects of intervention by trained care managers on advance care planning engagement among long-term care service users in Japan: a pre- and post-pilot comparative study across multiple institutions.日本长期护理服务使用者中,受过培训的护理经理进行干预对预先护理计划参与度的影响:一项多机构的试点前后对比研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 23;18:26323524241281065. doi: 10.1177/26323524241281065. eCollection 2024.
4
Tools for tomorrow: a scoping review of patient-facing tools for advance care planning.面向未来的工具:对用于预先医疗护理计划的患者端工具的范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Jun 24;18:26323524241263108. doi: 10.1177/26323524241263108. eCollection 2024.
5
Effect of an app for promoting advance care planning and motivating patients to write their advance directives.促进预先护理计划和激励患者撰写预先指示的应用程序的效果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 1;23(1):566. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09593-3.
6
Publicly Available, Interactive Web-Based Tools to Support Advance Care Planning: Systematic Review.公开可用的交互式网络工具以支持预先护理计划:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e33320. doi: 10.2196/33320.
7
A Mobile App for Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives (Accordons-nous): Development and Usability Study.一款用于预先护理规划和预先医疗指示的移动应用程序(Accordons-nous):开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Apr 20;9(2):e34626. doi: 10.2196/34626.
8
GeriKit: A novel app for comprehensive geriatric assessment.GeriKit:一种用于全面老年评估的新型应用程序。
Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2023 Oct 2;44(4):641-648. doi: 10.1080/02701960.2022.2048298. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based advance care plan for dementia.基于网络的痴呆症预先护理计划的可行性和可接受性。
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;44:251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
10
Dissemination, use, and impact of a community-based, conversational advance care planning intervention: ripple effects of the Swedish DöBra cards.基于社区的对话式预先护理计划干预措施的传播、使用及影响:瑞典DöBra卡的连锁反应
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2021 Aug 10;15:26323524211032983. doi: 10.1177/26323524211032983. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Diverse English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults in Advance Care Planning: The PREPARE Randomized Clinical Trial.参与式准备计划研究:一项针对不同英语和西班牙语老年人群体的随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1616-1625. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4657.
2
Improving a Full Range of Advance Care Planning Behavior Change and Action Domains: The PREPARE Randomized Trial.改善全方位的预先医疗照护计划行为改变和行动领域:PREPARE 随机试验。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Oct;56(4):575-581.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
3
Older patient engagement in advance care planning in Canadian primary care practices: Results of a multisite survey.加拿大初级保健实践中老年人参与预先医疗指示规划:多地点调查结果。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 May;64(5):371-377.
4
Barriers to and enablers of advance care planning with patients in primary care: Survey of health care providers.初级保健中医师患者开展预先医疗照护计划的障碍和促进因素:医疗保健提供者调查。
Can Fam Physician. 2018 Apr;64(4):e190-e198.
5
Evaluation of an advance care planning web-based resource: applicability for cancer treatment patients.评估一个预先护理计划的网络资源:对癌症治疗患者的适用性。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Mar;26(3):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3901-7. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
6
Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus.定义成功的预先医疗照护计划的结果:德尔菲小组共识。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Feb;55(2):245-255.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Effect of the PREPARE Website vs an Easy-to-Read Advance Directive on Advance Care Planning Documentation and Engagement Among Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial.PREPARE网站与易读的预立医疗指示对退伍军人预立医疗照护计划文件记录及参与度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;177(8):1102-1109. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1607.
8
Defining Advance Care Planning for Adults: A Consensus Definition From a Multidisciplinary Delphi Panel.为成年人定义预先护理计划:多学科德尔菲专家组的共识定义
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 May;53(5):821-832.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.331. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
9
Measuring Advance Care Planning: Optimizing the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey.衡量预先护理计划:优化预先护理计划参与度调查。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):669-681.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.10.367. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
10
Measuring engagement in advance care planning: a cross-sectional multicentre feasibility study.测量预先医疗照护计划的参与度:一项跨中心的可行性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 23;6(6):e010375. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010375.

互动网站对参与门诊环境下预先护理计划患者的影响。

Effect of an Interactive Website to Engage Patients in Advance Care Planning in Outpatient Settings.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2020 Mar;18(2):110-117. doi: 10.1370/afm.2471.

DOI:10.1370/afm.2471
PMID:32152014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7062494/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Online programs may help to engage patients in advance care planning in outpatient settings. We sought to implement an online advance care planning program, PREPARE (Prepare for Your Care; http://www.prepareforyourcare.org), at home and evaluate the changes in advance care planning engagement among patients attending outpatient clinics.

METHODS

We undertook a prospective before-and-after study in 15 primary care clinics and 2 outpatient cancer centers in Canada. Patients were aged 50 years or older (primary care) or 18 years or older (cancer care) and free of cognitive impairment. They used the PREPARE website over 6 weeks, with reminders sent at 2 or 4 weeks. We used the 55-item Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey, which measures behavior change processes (knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy, readiness) on 5-point scales and actions relating to substitute decision makers, quality of life, flexibility for the decision maker, and asking doctors questions on an overall scale from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate greater engagement.

RESULTS

In total, 315 patients were screened and 172 enrolled, of whom 75% completed the study (mean age = 65.6 years, 51% female, 35% had cancer). The mean behavior change process score was 2.9 (SD 0.8) at baseline and 3.5 (SD 0.8) at follow-up (mean change = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.49-0.73); the mean action measure score was 4.0 (SD 4.9) at baseline and 5.2 (SD 5.4) at follow-up (mean change = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.54-1.77). The effect size was moderate (0.75) for the former and small (0.23) for the latter. Findings were similar in both primary care and cancer care populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the online PREPARE program in primary care and cancer care clinics increased advance care planning engagement among patients.

摘要

目的

在线项目可能有助于在门诊环境中使患者参与预先护理计划。我们试图在家中实施在线预先护理计划项目 PREPARE(准备您的护理;http://www.prepareforyourcare.org),并评估门诊患者参与预先护理计划的变化。

方法

我们在加拿大的 15 个初级保健诊所和 2 个门诊癌症中心进行了前瞻性的前后研究。患者年龄在 50 岁及以上(初级保健)或 18 岁及以上(癌症保健),且无认知障碍。他们在 6 周内使用 PREPARE 网站,并在 2 或 4 周时发送提醒。我们使用 55 项预先护理计划参与调查,该调查使用 5 分制衡量行为改变过程(知识、思考、自我效能、准备就绪),以及与替代决策者、生活质量、决策者的灵活性和向医生询问有关问题的整体评分,总分为 0 至 21 分;得分越高表示参与度越高。

结果

共筛选了 315 名患者,有 172 名患者入组,其中 75%完成了研究(平均年龄=65.6 岁,51%为女性,35%患有癌症)。基线时行为改变过程的平均得分为 2.9(SD 0.8),随访时为 3.5(SD 0.8)(平均变化=0.6;95%CI,0.49-0.73);基线时行动措施的平均得分为 4.0(SD 4.9),随访时为 5.2(SD 5.4)(平均变化=1.2;95%CI,0.54-1.77)。前者的效果大小为中等(0.75),后者的效果大小为小(0.23)。初级保健和癌症保健人群的结果相似。

结论

在初级保健和癌症保健诊所实施在线 PREPARE 计划增加了患者对预先护理计划的参与度。