• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构的居住时间:六个欧洲国家居民的比较。PACE 横断面研究的结果。

Length of stay in long-term care facilities: a comparison of residents in six European countries. Results of the PACE cross-sectional study.

机构信息

International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK

International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e033881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033881.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033881
PMID:32152166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7064078/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper aims to investigate resident, facility and country characteristics associated with length of stay in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) across six European countries.

SETTING

Data from a cross-sectional study of deceased residents, conducted in LTCFs in Belgium, England, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Poland.

PARTICIPANTS

All residents aged 65 years and older at admission who died in a 3-month period residing in a proportional random sample of LTCFs were included.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was length of stay in days, calculated from date of admission and date of death. Resident, facility and country characteristics were included in a proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The proportion of deaths within 1 year of admission was 42% (range 32%-63%). Older age at admission (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06), being married/in a civil partnership at time of death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.89), having cancer at time of death (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.10) and admission from a hospital (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.37) or another LTCF (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.40) were associated with shorter lengths of stay across all countries. Being female (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90) was associated with longer lengths of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Length of stay varied significantly between countries. Factors prior to LTCF admission, in particular the availability of resources that allow an older adult to remain living in the community, appear to influence length of stay. Further research is needed to explore the availability of long-term care in the community prior to admission and its influence on the trajectories of LTCF residents in Europe.

摘要

目的

本文旨在研究六个欧洲国家的居民、设施和国家特征与长期护理机构(LTCF)中居民的住院时间之间的关系。

背景

这项研究的数据来自比利时、英国、芬兰、意大利、荷兰和波兰六个欧洲国家的 LTCF 中进行的一项死亡居民的横断面研究。

参与者

所有在 3 个月内入住 LTCF 并死亡的年龄在 65 岁及以上的居民都被纳入了研究。

主要和次要结果

主要结果是住院时间,从入院日期和死亡日期计算。居民、设施和国家特征被纳入比例风险模型。

结果

在入院后 1 年内死亡的比例为 42%(范围为 32%-63%)。入院时年龄较大(HR 1.04,95%CI 1.03-1.06)、在死亡时已婚/处于民事伴侣关系(HR 1.47,95%CI 1.13-1.89)、在死亡时患有癌症(HR 1.60,95%CI 1.22-2.10)、从医院(HR 1.84,95%CI 1.43-2.37)或其他 LTCF(HR 1.81,95%CI 1.37-2.40)入院与所有国家的住院时间较短相关。女性(HR 0.72,95%CI 0.57-0.90)与较长的住院时间相关。

结论

住院时间在国家之间差异显著。LTCF 入院前的因素,特别是允许老年人继续在社区生活的资源的可用性,似乎会影响住院时间。需要进一步研究,以探讨入院前社区长期护理的可用性及其对欧洲 LTCF 居民轨迹的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c950/7064078/432defb43f1e/bmjopen-2019-033881f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c950/7064078/432defb43f1e/bmjopen-2019-033881f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c950/7064078/432defb43f1e/bmjopen-2019-033881f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Length of stay in long-term care facilities: a comparison of residents in six European countries. Results of the PACE cross-sectional study.长期护理机构的居住时间:六个欧洲国家居民的比较。PACE 横断面研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e033881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033881.
2
Dying in long-term care facilities in Europe: the PACE epidemiological study of deceased residents in six countries.在欧洲的长期护理机构中死亡:六个国家死亡居民的 PACE 流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):1199. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7532-4.
3
Associations between Length of Stay in Long Term Care Facilities and End of Life Care. Analysis of the PACE Cross-Sectional Study.长期护理机构住院时间与临终关怀的关联。PACE 横断面研究分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2742. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082742.
4
Opioid, antipsychotic and hypnotic use in end of life in long-term care facilities in six European countries: results of PACE.在六个欧洲国家的长期护理机构中,临终关怀中阿片类药物、抗精神病药和催眠药的使用:PACE 的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Feb 1;29(1):74-79. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cky196.
5
Insomnia in long-term care facilities: a comparison of seven European countries and Israel: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care study.长期护理机构中的失眠:七个欧洲国家与以色列的比较:长期护理中老年人的服务与健康研究
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Nov;62(11):2033-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13099. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
6
Physician Visits and Recognition of Residents' Terminal Phase in Long-Term Care Facilities: Findings From the PACE Cross-Sectional Study in 6 EU Countries.长期护理机构中医生访视和识别居民终末期的情况:来自 6 个欧盟国家 PACE 横断面研究的结果。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jun;20(6):696-702.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
7
Perception of the Quality of Communication With Physicians Among Relatives of Dying Residents of Long-term Care Facilities in 6 European Countries: PACE Cross-Sectional Study.6 个欧洲国家长期护理机构临终居民的亲属对与医生沟通质量的感知:PACE 横断面研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
8
Palliative care provision in long-term care facilities differs across Europe: Results of a cross-sectional study in six European countries (PACE).长期护理机构中的姑息治疗提供情况在欧洲各国有所不同:六个欧洲国家(PACE)的一项横断面研究结果。
Palliat Med. 2019 Oct;33(9):1176-1188. doi: 10.1177/0269216319861229. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
9
[Retrospective analysis of health variables in a Reykjavík nursing home 1983-2002 (corrected)].1983 - 2002年雷克雅未克一家养老院健康变量的回顾性分析(修正版)
Laeknabladid. 2005 Feb;91(2):153-60.
10
Physical restraining of nursing home residents in the last week of life: An epidemiological study in six European countries.在生命的最后一周对养老院居民进行身体限制:六个欧洲国家的一项流行病学研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Apr;104:103511. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103511. Epub 2019 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Change over time in characteristics and survival of residents newly admitted to nursing homes: an analysis of health insurance claims data from 2011 to 2020 in Germany.养老院新入住居民特征及生存情况随时间的变化:对德国2011年至2020年医疗保险理赔数据的分析
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Jul 21;22(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00871-z.
2
Breaking the cycle: how Spain's dependency care system creates occupational inequalities in geriatric nursing assistants and the need for reform.打破循环:西班牙的长期护理体系如何在老年护理助理中造成职业不平等以及改革的必要性。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Mar 18;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02426-1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with length of stay in care homes: a systematic review of international literature.与养老院入住时间相关的因素:国际文献的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 20;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0973-0.
2
Quality of dying and quality of end-of-life care of nursing home residents in six countries: An epidemiological study.六个国家养老院居民临终质量和临终关怀质量:一项流行病学研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1584-1595. doi: 10.1177/0269216318800610. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
3
Health determinants and survival in nursing home residents in Europe: Results from the SHELTER study.
Trajectories of long-term care entitlements in severely disabled older adults using nationwide Dutch data.
利用荷兰全国性数据探究重度残疾老年人长期护理权益的变化轨迹
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Feb 23;22(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00840-6.
4
Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications according to STOPP-Frail criteria in nursing home residents, the SHELTER study.根据 STOPP-Frail 标准,养老院居民潜在不适当药物的流行情况,SHELTER 研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05450-y.
5
Cost savings from medication reviews in community pharmacies for nursing home residents in Estonia: a case study.社区药房对爱沙尼亚养老院居民进行药物审查的成本节约:案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11504-z.
6
Challenges in recognizing and discussing changes in a resident's condition in the palliative phase: focus group discussions with nursing staff working in nursing homes about their experiences.在姑息治疗阶段识别和讨论居民病情变化方面的挑战:与养老院护理人员进行的焦点小组讨论,了解他们的经验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jun 10;23(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01479-3.
7
The effects of individual music therapy in nursing home residents with dementia to improve general well-being: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.个体音乐疗法对养老院痴呆症患者整体幸福感的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04863-z.
8
Adherence to the Atrial fibrillation Better Care pathway and the risk of adverse health outcomes in older care home residents with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective data linkage study 2003-18.老年房颤患者遵循房颤最佳护理路径与不良健康结局风险的相关性:一项 2003-2018 年回顾性数据链接研究
Age Ageing. 2024 Feb 1;53(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae021.
9
Low and High Ankle-Brachial Index Are Both Associated with Mortality in German Nursing Home Residents-The Five-Year Follow-Up of the "Allo-Study" Cohort.低和高踝臂指数均与德国养老院居民的死亡率相关——“Allo研究”队列的五年随访
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 30;12(13):4411. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134411.
10
The Quality of Dying in Frail Institutionalized Older Patients After Nonoperative and Operative Management of a Proximal Femoral Fracture: An In-Depth Analysis.虚弱的机构化老年患者在股骨近端骨折非手术和手术治疗后的临终质量:深入分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Jun;41(6):583-591. doi: 10.1177/10499091231180556. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
欧洲养老院居民的健康决定因素和生存状况:SHELTER 研究结果。
Maturitas. 2018 Jan;107:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
What is the impact of population ageing on the future provision of end-of-life care? Population-based projections of place of death.人口老龄化对未来临终关怀服务的提供有何影响?基于人口的死亡地点预测。
Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):329-336. doi: 10.1177/0269216317734435. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Trajectories of End of Life: A Systematic Review.生命终末期轨迹:系统综述。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Apr 16;73(4):564-572. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx093.
6
Palliative Care Experience in the Last 3 Months of Life: A Quantitative Comparison of Care Provided in Residential Hospices, Hospitals, and the Home From the Perspectives of Bereaved Caregivers.生命最后三个月的姑息治疗体验:从丧亲照料者角度对住院临终关怀机构、医院和家中提供的护理进行定量比较
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):456-463. doi: 10.1177/1049909117713497. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
7
Comparing Palliative Care in Care Homes Across Europe (PACE): Protocol of a Cross-sectional Study of Deceased Residents in 6 EU Countries.欧洲养老院姑息治疗比较研究(PACE):一项针对6个欧盟国家已故居民的横断面研究方案
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jun 1;17(6):566.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.03.008. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Differences in predictors of 5-year survival over a 10-year period in two cohorts of elderly nursing home residents in Sweden.瑞典两个老年疗养院居民队列中10年间5年生存率预测因素的差异。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2016 Dec;30(4):714-720. doi: 10.1111/scs.12284. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Rationale and study protocol for the Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision aid for patients transitioning from the hospital to a skilled-nursing facility.养老院比较计划(NHCPlus)随机对照试验的原理和研究方案:为从医院转至康复护理机构的患者提供个性化决策辅助。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:139-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.018. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
10
Relationship Status and Long-Term Care Facility Use in Later Life.晚年的恋爱状况与长期护理机构的使用情况
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Jul;71(4):711-23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv106. Epub 2015 Nov 17.