Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
Division of Molecular Pathology, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Med Genet. 2020 Aug;57(8):509-518. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106368. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Germline DNA tests to identify pathogenic variants in genes linked to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility have become widely available. However, the clinical utility of genetic testing depends on reliable evidence-based classification of sequence variants. Determination of pathogenicity traditionally relies on painstaking pedigree-based segregation analyses. However, the rapid increase in usage of germline DNA tests has led to the discovery of a large number of variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS). For most VUS there is insufficient information for segregation analysis and therefore assessment of functional consequences is increasingly being used to support clinical annotation. Functional assays need to be accurate, robust, and reproducible to be used for clinical purposes. Here we use the lessons learned from and to identify best practices for the use of functional assays for clinical annotation of germline VUS in breast and ovarian cancer genes. We provide recommendations for the interpretation and use of established functional assays as well as for the development of new assays.
生殖系 DNA 检测可识别与遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性相关基因中的致病性变异,现已广泛应用。然而,基因检测的临床实用性取决于对序列变异进行可靠的基于证据的分类。致病性的确定传统上依赖于艰苦的基于家系的分离分析。然而,生殖系 DNA 检测的使用迅速增加,导致了大量不确定临床意义的变异(VUS)的发现。对于大多数 VUS,没有足够的信息进行分离分析,因此越来越多地使用功能后果评估来支持临床注释。功能检测需要准确、稳健和可重复,才能用于临床目的。在这里,我们借鉴 和 的经验教训,确定了用于临床注释乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因中生殖系 VUS 的功能检测的最佳实践。我们为解释和使用已建立的功能检测以及开发新的检测提供了建议。