• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组织对有向层次图的社会影响,从暴政到无政府状态。

Organisational Social Influence on Directed Hierarchical Graphs, from Tyranny to Anarchy.

机构信息

The University of Warwick, Centre for Doctoral Training in Mathematics for Real-World Systems, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Cranfield University, Centre for Autonomous and Cyberphysical Systems, Cranfield, MK43 0AL, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 9;10(1):4388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61196-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-61196-8
PMID:32152387
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7062773/
Abstract

Coordinated human behaviour takes place within a diverse range of social organisational structures, which can be thought of as power structures with "managers" who influence "subordinates". A change in policy in one part of the organisation can cause cascades throughout the structure, which may or may not be desirable. As organisations change in size, complexity and structure, the system dynamics also change. Here, we consider majority rule dynamics on organisations modelled as hierarchical directed graphs, where the directed edges indicate influence. We utilise a topological measure called the trophic incoherence parameter, q, which effectively gauges the stratification of power structure in an organisation. We show that this measure bounds regimes of behaviour. There is fast consensus at low q (e.g. tyranny), slow consensus at mid q (e.g. democracy), and no consensus at high q (e.g. anarchy). These regimes are investigated analytically, numerically and empirically with diverse case studies in the Roman Army, US Government, and a healthcare organisation. Our work demonstrates the usefulness of the trophic incoherence parameter when considering models of social influence dynamics, with widespread consequences in the design and analysis of organisations.

摘要

协调的人类行为发生在各种不同的社会组织结构中,可以将这些结构视为具有“管理者”影响“下属”的权力结构。组织内部的政策变化会在整个结构中引发级联效应,这可能是可取的,也可能是不可取的。随着组织规模、复杂性和结构的变化,系统动态也会发生变化。在这里,我们考虑将组织建模为有向分层图的多数规则动态,其中有向边表示影响。我们利用一种称为营养不连贯性参数 q 的拓扑度量,有效地衡量组织中权力结构的分层。我们表明,该度量可以限制行为的范围。q 值较低时(例如暴政)会快速达成共识,q 值中等时(例如民主)则达成共识较慢,而 q 值较高时(例如无政府状态)则无法达成共识。我们通过对罗马军队、美国政府和医疗保健组织等不同案例的分析、数值和实证研究来研究这些状态。我们的工作表明,在考虑社会影响动态模型时,营养不连贯性参数是有用的,这对组织的设计和分析具有广泛的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/03d28035d839/41598_2020_61196_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/1adf4482314c/41598_2020_61196_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/0e057eaa0338/41598_2020_61196_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/dcee4df60d2d/41598_2020_61196_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/72ab1a9a2137/41598_2020_61196_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/281b59a7d804/41598_2020_61196_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/cd9d37b7c515/41598_2020_61196_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/7870e0f74ab3/41598_2020_61196_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/87232675418a/41598_2020_61196_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/40262ebb4256/41598_2020_61196_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/03d28035d839/41598_2020_61196_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/1adf4482314c/41598_2020_61196_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/0e057eaa0338/41598_2020_61196_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/dcee4df60d2d/41598_2020_61196_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/72ab1a9a2137/41598_2020_61196_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/281b59a7d804/41598_2020_61196_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/cd9d37b7c515/41598_2020_61196_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/7870e0f74ab3/41598_2020_61196_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/87232675418a/41598_2020_61196_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/40262ebb4256/41598_2020_61196_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a057/7062773/03d28035d839/41598_2020_61196_Fig10_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Organisational Social Influence on Directed Hierarchical Graphs, from Tyranny to Anarchy.组织对有向层次图的社会影响,从暴政到无政府状态。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 9;10(1):4388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61196-8.
2
Graph hierarchy: a novel framework to analyse hierarchical structures in complex networks.图层次结构:分析复杂网络中层次结构的新框架。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 6;11(1):13943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93161-4.
3
Random walk hierarchy measure: What is more hierarchical, a chain, a tree or a star?随机游走层次度量:链、树或星,哪种更具层次性?
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 10;5:17994. doi: 10.1038/srep17994.
4
Organisational citizenship behaviour: Sensitization to an organisational phenomenon.组织公民行为:对一种组织现象的敏感化
J Nurs Manag. 2018 Oct;26(7):795-801. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12622. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
5
6
Why are organisations that provide healthcare services fuzzy?为什么提供医疗服务的机构不明确?
Australas Med J. 2013 Nov 30;6(11):542-8. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2013.1857. eCollection 2013.
7
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
8
Stability of graph communities across time scales.跨时间尺度的图社区稳定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):12755-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903215107. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
9
Assessing statistical significance in causal graphs.评估因果图中的统计显著性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Feb 20;13:35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-35.
10
Hierarchy measure for complex networks.复杂网络的层次度量。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033799. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence and influenceability: global directionality in directed complex networks.影响力与可影响力:有向复杂网络中的全局方向性
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Aug 30;10(8):221380. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221380. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Strong connectivity in real directed networks.真实有向网络中的强连通性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 21;120(12):e2215752120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215752120. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Resilience or robustness: identifying topological vulnerabilities in rail networks.韧性或稳健性:识别铁路网络中的拓扑脆弱性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Feb 6;6(2):181301. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181301. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Structure and dynamical behavior of non-normal networks.非正规网络的结构与动力学行为
Sci Adv. 2018 Dec 12;4(12):eaau9403. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau9403. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Topological resilience in non-normal networked systems.非正态网络系统中的拓扑弹性。
Phys Rev E. 2018 Apr;97(4-1):042302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.97.042302.
4
The origin of motif families in food webs.食物网中基序家族的起源。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 23;7(1):16197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15496-1.
5
Looplessness in networks is linked to trophic coherence.网络中的无环性与营养连贯性相关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 30;114(22):5618-5623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613786114. Epub 2017 May 16.
6
No complexity-stability relationship in empirical ecosystems.经验生态系统中不存在复杂性-稳定性关系。
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 24;7:12573. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12573.
7
From neurons to epidemics: How trophic coherence affects spreading processes.从神经元到流行病:营养连贯性如何影响传播过程。
Chaos. 2016 Jun;26(6):065310. doi: 10.1063/1.4953160.
8
Universal resilience patterns in complex networks.复杂网络中的普遍恢复模式。
Nature. 2016 Feb 18;530(7590):307-12. doi: 10.1038/nature16948.
9
Trophic coherence determines food-web stability.营养连贯性决定食物网的稳定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 16;111(50):17923-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409077111. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
10
Universality in network dynamics.网络动力学中的普遍性。
Nat Phys. 2013;9:673-81. doi: 10.1038/nphys2741.