Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Diabetologia. 2020 Jun;63(6):1248-1257. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05120-9. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Microvascular disease in type 2 diabetes is a significant cause of end-stage renal disease, blindness and peripheral neuropathy. The strict control of known risk factors, e.g. lifestyle, hyperglycaemia, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, reduces the incidence of microvascular complications, but a residual risk remains. Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a strong risk factor for macrovascular disease in the general population. We hypothesised that plasma Lp(a) levels and the LPA gene SNPs rs10455872 and rs3798220 are associated with the incident development of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Analyses were performed of data from the DiaGene study, a prospective study for complications of type 2 diabetes, collected in the city of Eindhoven, the Netherlands (n = 1886 individuals with type 2 diabetes, mean follow-up time = 6.97 years). To assess the relationship between plasma Lp(a) levels and the LPA SNPs with each newly developed microvascular complication (retinopathy n = 223, nephropathy n = 246, neuropathy n = 236), Cox proportional hazards models were applied and adjusted for risk factors for microvascular complications (age, sex, mean arterial pressure, non-HDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, BMI, duration of type 2 diabetes, HbA and smoking). RESULTS: No significant associations of Lp(a) plasma levels and the LPA SNPs rs10455872 and rs3798220 with prevalent or incident microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes were found. In line with previous observations the LPA SNPs rs10455872 and rs3798220 did influence the plasma Lp(a) levels. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our data show no association between Lp(a) plasma levels and the LPA SNPs with known effect on Lp(a) plasma levels with the development of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. This indicates that Lp(a) does not play a major role in the development of microvascular complications. However, larger studies are needed to exclude minimal effects of Lp(a) on the development of microvascular complications.
目的/假设:2 型糖尿病中的微血管疾病是终末期肾病、失明和周围神经病变的重要原因。严格控制已知的危险因素,如生活方式、高血糖、高血压和血脂异常,可以降低微血管并发症的发生率,但仍存在残余风险。脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]是普通人群大血管疾病的一个强有力的危险因素。我们假设血浆 Lp(a)水平和 LPA 基因 SNPs rs10455872 和 rs3798220 与 2 型糖尿病微血管并发症的发生发展有关。 方法:对荷兰埃因霍温市进行的 2 型糖尿病并发症前瞻性研究 DiaGene 研究的数据进行了分析(n=1886 例 2 型糖尿病患者,平均随访时间=6.97 年)。为了评估血浆 Lp(a)水平与 LPA SNPs 与每一种新发生的微血管并发症(视网膜病变 n=223,肾病 n=246,神经病变 n=236)之间的关系,应用 Cox 比例风险模型进行分析,并调整了微血管并发症的危险因素(年龄、性别、平均动脉压、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、BMI、2 型糖尿病病程、HbA 和吸烟)。 结果:未发现 Lp(a)血浆水平和 LPA SNPs rs10455872 和 rs3798220 与 2 型糖尿病中现患或新发微血管并发症之间存在显著相关性。与先前的观察结果一致,LPA SNPs rs10455872 和 rs3798220 确实影响了血浆 Lp(a)水平。 结论/解释:我们的数据显示,Lp(a)血浆水平与 LPA SNPs 之间没有关联,而 LPA SNPs 对 Lp(a)血浆水平有已知的影响,与 2 型糖尿病中微血管并发症的发展无关。这表明 Lp(a)在微血管并发症的发展中没有起主要作用。然而,需要更大的研究来排除 Lp(a)对微血管并发症发展的微小影响。
Circulation. 2017-1-17
Hum Mol Genet. 2015-4-15
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013-10-23
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-4-30
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025-3-4
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024-1-31
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023-5-1
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017-7-1
J Lipid Res. 2016-8
J Diabetes Complications. 2016-7
J Res Med Sci. 2015-11